A Study of Certain Criteria of Teaching Effectiveness

Bibliography

• Adams, W. C. T. “Teacher Rating Card,” American School Board Journal, LVIII (December 1919), p. 30.
   Google Scholar
• Albert, H. R. “An Analysis of Teacher Rating by Pupils in San Antonio, Texas,” Educational Administration and Supervision, XXVII (April 1941), pp. 267–74.
   Google Scholar
• Baier, Donald E. “Reply to Travers: A Critical Review of the Validity and Rationale of the Forced Choice Technique,” Psychological Bulletin, XLVIII (September 1951), pp. 421–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, A. S. and others. “The Validity of Certain Instruments Employed in the Measur urement of Teaching Ability,” in The Measurement of Teaching Efficiency, Helen M. Walker, Editor (New York: Macmillan Co., 1935). pp. 71–141.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, A. S. and others “Measurement of Teaching Ability,” Review of Educational Research (June 1934), pp. 261–67; 329–30.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, A. S. and others “Measurement of Teaching Ability,” Review of Educational Research X (June 1940), pp. 182–84.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, A. S. and others “The Measurement and Prediction of Teaching Efficiency,” Review of Educational Research, XIII (June 1943), pp. 218–23.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, A. S. and others “The Measurement of Teacher Characteristics and the Prediction of Teaching Efficiency,” Review of Educational Research, XXII (June 1952), pp. 169–73.
   Google Scholar
• Beecher, Dwight E. Evaluation of Teaching (Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press, 1949), 105 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, Gilbert L. Reliability and Validity of Measures of Teaching Ability or Teaching Success, Special Survey Studies, National Survey of the Education of Teachers, Bulletin, 1933, No. 10, Vol. V, Part II (Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office, 1935), pp. 87–153.
   Google Scholar
• Bimson, Oliver H. “Do Good Teachers Produce Good Results?” North Central Association Quarterly, XII (October 1937), pp. 271–76.
   Google Scholar
• Boardman, Charles W. Professional Tests as Measures of Teaching Efficiency in High School, Contributions to Education, No. 327 (New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1928), 85 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Book, M. F. “The High School Teacher from the Pupils’ Point of View,” Pedagogic Seminary, XII (September 1905), pp. 239–88.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, A. C. “Methods of Measuring Teachers Efficiency,” Part II, Fourteenth Yearbook of N.S.S.E. (Bloomington, Ill.: Public School Publishing Co., 1915).
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, Robert B., and Bryan, Roy C. “To What Extent Do Pupils’ Opinions of Teachers Change in Later Years?” Journal of Educational Research, XXXVII (May 1944), pp. 698–705.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, W. J. “Followup of Some Earlier Wisconsin Studies of Teaching Efficiency,” Journal of Experimental Education, XVIII (September 1949), pp. 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Samuel S. “Measuring the Efficiency of Teachers by Standardized Tests,” Journal of Educational Research, IV (November 1921), pp. 255–64.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, Roy C. “Pupil Rating of Secondary School Teachers,” School Review, XLVI (May 1938), pp. 357–67.
   Google Scholar
• Butsch, R. L. C. “Teacher Rating,” Review of Educational Research, I (April 1931), pp. 99–107.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. F. “Evaluation and the Rating of Teachers,” Elementary School Journal, XLI (May 1941), pp. 671–76.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, Walter W., and Leeds, Carroll H. “Measuring the Teaching Personality,” Educational and Psychological Measurement VII (May 1947), pp. 399–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, William H. “Uniform Standards for Judging Teachers in South Dakota,” Educational Administration and Supervision, VII (1921), pp. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Coy, Genevieve L. “A Study of Various Factors Which Influence the Use of the Accomplishment Quotient as a Measure of Teaching Efficiency,” Journal of Educational Research, XXI (January 1930), pp. 29–42.
   Google Scholar
• Crabs, Lelah M. Measuring Efficiency in Supervision and Teaching, Contributions to Education, No. 175 (New York: Teach ers College, Columbia University, 1925), 98 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, Lee J. “Test Reliability: Its Meaning and Determination,” Psychometrika, XII (March 1947), pp. 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domas, S. J., and Tiedeman, D. V. “Teacher Competence: An Annotated Bibliography,” Journal of Experimental Education, XIX (December 1950), pp. 101–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, Kathleen M. “A Critical Survey of Methods of Assessing Teaching Ability,” British Journal of Educational Psychology, XXI, Part II, (June 1951), pp. 89–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetsch, E. W. “In Service Checkup of Iowa State Teachers College Graduates,” School and Society, LXIX (June 1949), pp. 419–23.
   Google Scholar
• Good, Carter V., and others. The Methodology of Educational Research (New York: D. Appleton-Century Co., 1941), 863 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Gotham, R. E. “Personality and Teaching Efficiency,” Journal of Experimental Education, XIV (December 1945), pp. 157–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, E. R. “Evaluation of Faculty Service,” American Association of University Professors Bulletin, XXXI (June 1945), pp. 255–62.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, N. D. “An Analysis of Supervisory Ratings of Elementary Teachers Graduated from Iowa State Teachers College,” Journal of Experimental Education, XX (December 1951), pp. 179–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, Basil C. “Open the Curtain on this Farce Called Teacher Evaluation,” Educational Administration and Supervision, XXXII (October 1946), pp. 412–18.
   Google Scholar
• Hielman, J. D., and Arman Trout, W. D. “The Rating of College Teachers on Ten Traits by Their Students,” Journal of Educational Psychology, XXVII (March 1936), pp. 197–216.
   Google Scholar
• Hildreth, Gertrude. “Results of Repeated Measurement of Pupil Achievement,” Journal of Educational Psychology, XXI (April 1930), pp. 286–96.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C. W. “The Efficiency Ratings of Teachers,” Elementary School Journal, XXI (February 1921), pp. 438–43.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppoch, Robert. “New York University Students Grade Their Professors,” School and Society, LXVI (July 1947), pp. 70–72.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Palmer O. Statistical Methods in Research (New York: Prentice Hall, 1949), 357 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Ronald D. “The Prediction of Teaching Efficiency from Objective Measures,” Journal of Experimental Education, XV (September 1946), pp. 85–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, F. G. Qualities Related to Success in Teaching (New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1922), 67 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Kratz, Henry Elton. Studies and Observations in the Schoolroom (New York: Educational Publishing Co., 1907), 220 pp.
   Google Scholar
• LaDuke, C. V. “The Measurement of Teaching Ability, Study No. 3,” Journal of Experimental Education, XIV (September 1945), pp. 75–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindquist, E. F., and others. Educational Measurement (Washington, D. C.: American Council on Education, 1951), 808 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Lins, Leo J. “The Prediction of Teaching Efficiency,” Journal of Experimental Education, XV (September 1946), pp. 2–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCartha, Carl W. “The Practice of Teacher Evaluation in the Southwest in 1948,” Journal of Educational Research, XLIV (October 1950), pp. 122–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNemar, Quinn. Psychological Statistics (New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1949), 344 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, J. L. Normal School Education and Efficiency in Teaching (New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1906).
   Google Scholar
• Myers, G. C. “Teachers’ Ratings,” School and Society, V (March 17, 1917), pp. 322–23.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, C. C., and VanVoorhis, W. R. Statistical Procedures and Their Mathematical Bases (New York: McGraw Hill Book Co., 1940), 478 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Pittenger, B. F. “Problems in Teacher Measurement,” Journal of Educational Psychology, VIII (1917), pp. 103–10.
   Google Scholar
• Remmers, H. H., and others. “Interrelationship of Various Teaching Criteria,” American Psychologist (abstract), IV-7 (July 1949), p. 288.
   Google Scholar
• Rider, Paul R. An Introduction to Modern Statistical Methods (New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1939), 192 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Rolfe, J. G. “The Measurment of Teaching Ability, Study No. 2,” Journal of Experimental Education, XIV (September 1945), pp. 52–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, C. C. Measurement in Today’s Schools (New York: Prentice-Hall, 1947), 532 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Rostker, Leon E. “The Measurement of Teaching Ability, Study No. 1,” Journal of Experimental Education, XIV (September 1945), pp. 6–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruediger, W. C., and Strauer, G. D. “The Qualities of Merit in Teachers,” Journal of Educational Psychology, I (1910), pp. 272–78.
   Google Scholar
• Rugg, Harold. “Is the Rating of Human Character Possible?” Journal of Educational Psychology, XII (November, December 1921), pp. 425–38; 485-501; XIII (January, October 1922), pp. 30–42; 81–93.
   Google Scholar
• Ryans, David G. “The Criteria of Teaching Effectiveness,” Journal of Educational Research, XLII (May 1949), pp. 690–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, Frank G. “Appraising and Rewarding Teaching Effectiveness,” Charting the Course for American Higher Education in a Period of Partial Mobilization (Washington, D. C.: Department of Higher Education, National Education Association, 1951).
   Google Scholar
• Symonds, Percival M. “Reflections on Observations of Teachers,” Journal of Educational Research, XLIII (May 1950), pp. 688–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, H. “The Influence of the Teacher on Relative Class Standing,” 27th Yearbook of the N.S.S.E., Part II (Bloomington, Ill.: Public School Publishing Co., 1928), pp. 97–100.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, Godfrey H. The Factorial Analysis of Human Ability (New York: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1939), pp. 89–95.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, H. M. Elementary Statistical Methods (New York: Henry Holt and Co., 1943), 298 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Witty, Paul H. “An Evaluation of Investigations of the Effective Teacher,” American Psychologist, III (July 1948), pp. 264–65.
   Google Scholar
• Yankey, J. V., and Anderson, P. L. “Review of Literature on Factors Conditioning Teacher Success,” Educational Administration and Supervision, XIX (October 1933), pp. 511–520.
   Google Scholar
• Buros, Oscar Krisen. The Third Mental Measurements Yearbook (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1949), 1246 pp.
   Google Scholar