Relationships between Creative Thinking Abilities of Teachers and Achievement and Adjustment of Pupils

References

• Ackerman, W. I. “Teacher Competence and Pupil Change, “ Harvard Educational Review XXIV (1954), pp. 273–89.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, H. H., Brewer, J. E., and Reed, M. F. “Studies of Teachers’ Classroom Personalities: III. Follow-up Studies of the Effects of Dominative and Integrative Contacts on Children’s Behavior, “ Applied Psychological Monograph, No. 11 (1946).
   Google Scholar
• Barron, F. “Originality in Relation to Personality and Intellect,” Journal of Personality, XXV (1957), pp. 730–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borow, H. “Research Notes from Here and There: The Logic of Counseling Research,” Journal of Counseling Psychology, III (1956) pp. 292–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, E. “Stability of Scores on Personality Inventory Administered During College Orientation Week, “ Personnel and Guidance Journal, XXXVIII (1959), pp. 305–8.
   Google Scholar
• Federer, W. T. Experimental Design (New York: MacMillan, 1955).
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. Personality (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959).
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C. and Lindzey, G. Theories of Personality (New York: John Wiley, 1957).
   Google Scholar
• Heist, P. A. and Williams, Phoebe A. Manual for the Omnibus Personality Inventory (Berkeley, Calif.: Center for the Study of Higher Education, Univ. of California, 1957).
   Google Scholar
• Heist, P. A. and Yonge, G. An Attitude Scale for Measuring the Complexity-Simplicity Dimension (Berkeley, Calif,: Center for the Study of Higher Education, University of California, 1960).
   Google Scholar
• Hills, J. R. “The Influence of Instructions on Personality Scores,” Journal of Counseling Psychology, VIII (1961), pp. 43–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyt, C. J. “Test Reliability Estimated by Analysis of Variance,” Psychometrika, VI (1941), pp. 153–60.
   Google Scholar
• Lief, A. (Ed.) The Common-Sense Psychiatry of Dr. Adolf Meyer (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1948).
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D.W. “The Highly Effective Individual,” Teachers College Record, LXI (1960), pp. 367–78.
   Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. Motivation and Personality (New York: Harper, 1954).
   Google Scholar
• Medley, D. M. and Mitzel, H. E. “Application of Analysis of Variance to the Estimation of the Reliability of Observations of Teachers’ Classroom Behavior, “ Journal of Experimental Education, XXVII (1958), pp. 23–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medley, D. M. and Mitzel, H.E. “A Technique for Measuring Classroom Behavior,” Journal of Educational Psychology, XLIX (1958), pp. 86–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitzel, H. E. “A Behavioral Approach to the Assessment of Teacher Effectiveness, “ paper read at American Educational Research Association Conference, New York, February 19, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Mitzel, H. E. “Criteria of Teacher Effectiveness,” in Encyclopedia of Educational Research, 3rd edition, edited by C. W. Harris and M. R. Liba (New York: MacMillan, 1960), pp. 1481–6.
   Google Scholar
• Mitzel, H. E. and Gross, C. F. A Critical Review of the Development of Pupil Growth Criteria in Studies of Teacher Effectiveness (New York: Division of Teacher Education, City of New York, 1956).
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, E. S. and Hartley, H. O. “Charts of the Power Function for Analysis of Variance Tests, Derived from the Non-Central F-Distributions, “ Biometrika, XXXVIII (1951), pp. 112–30.
   Google Scholar
• Ryans, D. G. “Prediction of Teacher Effectiveness,” in Encyclopedia of Educational Research, 3rd edition, edited by C. W. Harris and M. R. Liba (New York: MacMillan, 1960), pp. 1486–91.
   Google Scholar
• Shoben, E. J. Jr., “Toward a Concept of the Normal Personality,“ American Psychologist, XII (1957), pp. 183–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. R. and Tyler, R.W. ” Appraising and Recording Student Progress (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1942).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. B. “Research Strategies Toward a Conception of Positive Mental Health,” American Psychologist, XIV (1959), pp. 673–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. Guiding Creative Talent (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1962).
   Google Scholar
• Webster, H. and Heist, P. “Construction of a Multiple Trait Personality Test for Use with College Populations,” paper read at Social Science Research Council on Personality Measures relevant to College Purposes, Berkeley, California, January 27, 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Wilk, R. E., Edson, W. H., Davies, D., and Chase, Naomi C. Student Teachers Activities and Pupil Responses: A Report to Participants (Minneapolis: Bureau of Educational Research, Univ. of Minnesota, 1960).
   Google Scholar
• Windle, C. “Test-retest Effect on Personality Questionnaires,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, XIV (1954), pp. 617–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, K. Creativity and Sociometric Choice Among Adolescents, M. A. research paper, Univ. of Minnesota, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, K. “Creativity and Intellect: Review of Current Research and Projection,” paper read at Minnesota Psychological Association Convention, Minneapolis, April 28, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, K. Revised Scoring Manual for Tests of Creative Thinking: Forms VA and NVA (Minneapolis: Bureau of Educational Research, Univ. of Minnesota, 1962).
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, K. A Study of the Relationships Between Creative Thinking Abilities of Fifth-Grade Teachers and Academic Achievement and Personal-Social Adjustment of Their Pupils, Ph. D. dissertation, Univ. of Minnesota, 1962.
   Google Scholar