Meta-Analysis of Factor Structure Studies

References

• Belcher, M. J., Crocker, L. M., & Algina, J. (1984). Can the same instrument be used to measure sex-role perceptions of males and females? Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 17, 15–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bem, S. L. (1975). Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bem, S. L. (1979). Theory and measurement of androgyny: A reply to the Pedhazur-Tetenbaum and Locksley-Colten critiques. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1047–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bledsoe, J. C. (1983). Factorial validity of the Bern Sex-Role Inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56, 55–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity-femininity: An exception to the famous dictum. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 389–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, T. A., Gaa, J. P., & Liberman, D. (1978, April). A factor analysis of the BSRI and the PAQ. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 177 187)
   Google Scholar
• Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, R., Batlis, N., Small, A., & Erdwins, C. (1979). Factor structure of the Bern Sex-Role Inventory and the Personal Attributes Questionnaire. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 1122–1124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttman, L. (1954). Some necessary conditions for common factor analysis. Psychometrika, 19, 149–161.
   Google Scholar
• Heilbrun, A. B. (1984). Sex-based models of androgyny: A further cognitive elaboration of competence differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 216–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoferek, M. J. (1981). Factor analysis of the Bern Sex-Role Inventory using data from physical educators. Unpublished manuscript. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 221 603)
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F., Hunka, S., & Bianchini, J. (1969). Relating factors between studies based upon different individuals. In H. J. Eysenck & S. B. G. Eysenck (Eds.), Personality structure and measurement (pp. 333–343). San Diego: Knapp.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. A., & Worell, J. (1977). New formulations of sex roles and androgyny: A critical review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 1101–1115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenigsberg, E. (1982, April). Perceptual-cognitive structure of sex-typed traits: Multidimensional scaling of the Bern Sex Role Inventory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 218 322)
   Google Scholar
• Light, R., & Pillemer, D. (1982). Numbers and narrative: Combining their strengths in research reviews. Harvard Educational Review, 52, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1985). The structure of masculinity/femininity: An application of confirmatory factor analysis to higher-order factor structures and factorial invariance. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 20, 427–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & Myers, M. (1984). Masculinity, femininity and androgyny: A methodological and theoretical critique. Collected papers of 1984 National Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education (pp. 566–581). Perth, Western Australia: Australian Association for Research in Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 242 758)
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. J. (1980, April). A factor-analytic comparison of two measures of masculinity-feminity in post and early adolescent populations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Hartford, CT. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 189 495)
   Google Scholar
• Moreland, J. R., Gulanick, N., Montague, E. K., & Harren, V. A. (1978). Some psychometric properties of the Bern Sex-Role Inventory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2, 249–256.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, J. M., & Liebert, R. M. (1986). Science and behavior: An introduction to methods of research (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pedhazur, E. J., & Tetenbaum, T. J. (1979). Bem Sex Role Inventory: A theoretical and methodological critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 996–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, G. N. (1979, September). Factor analysis of the BSRI revisited: A comprehensive study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Ruch, L. O. (1984). Dimensionality of the Bem Sex Role Inventory: A multidimensional analysis. Sex Roles, 10, 99–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassenrath, J. M., & Yonge, G. D. (1979). Bem Sex Role Inventory reexamined. Psychological Reports, 3, 935–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, B. (1984). Canonical correlation analysis: Uses and interpretation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, B. (1986, April). A partial test distribution for cosines among factors across samples. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, B., & Melancon, J. G. (1986). Factor structure of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 19, 77–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, B., & Melancon, J. G. (1987). Developmental trends in androgyny: Implications for measurement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Veldman, D. J. (1967). FORTRAN programming for the behavioral sciences. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, C. W., Waters, L. K., & Pincus, S. (1977). Factor analysis of masculine and feminine sex-typed items from the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Psychological Reports, 40, 567–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worell, J. (1978). Sex roles and psychological well-being: Perspectives on methodology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 777–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar