The Effect of Goal-Line Presentation and Goal Selection on First-Grader Subtraction Fluency

REFERENCES

• Axtell, P.K., McCallum, R.S., Bell, S.M., & Poncy, B.P. (2009). Developing math automaticity using a classwide fluency building procedure for middle school students: A preliminary study. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 526–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canobi, K.H. (2009). Concept-procedure interactions in children's addition and subtraction. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 131–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, M., Taasoobshirazi, R.S., & Royer, J.M. (2011). Combined fluency and cognitive strategies instruction improves mathematics achievement in early elementary school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 323–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codding, R., Chan-Iannetta, L., George, S., Ferreira, K., & Vople, R. (2011). Early number skills: Examining the effects of class-wide interventions on kindergarten performance. School Psychology Quarterly, 26, 85–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codding, R., Chan-Iannetta, L., Palmer, M., & Lukito, G. (2009). Examining a classwide application of cover-copy-compare with and without goal setting to enhance mathematics fluency. School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 173–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codding, R., Hilt-Panahon, A., Panahon, C.J., & Benson. (2009). Addressing mathematics computation problems: A review of simple and moderate intensity interventions. Education and Treatment of Children, 32, 279–312.
   Google Scholar
• Codding, R., Lewandowski, L., & Eckert, T. (2005). Examining the efficacy of performance feedback and goal setting interventions in children with ADHD: A comparison of two methods. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools, 6, 42–58.
   Google Scholar
• Codding, R., Shiyko, M., Russo, M., Birch, S., Fanning, E., & Jaspen, D. (2007). Comparing mathematics interventions: Does initial level of fluency predict intervention effectiveness? Journal of School Psychology, 45, 603–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly III, E.J., Lentz, F.E., & Boyer, J. (1996). The instructional hierarchy: A conceptual model for understanding the effective components of reading interventions. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 369–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, T., Ardoin, S., Daisey, D., & Scarola, M. (2000). Empirically evaluating the effectiveness of reading interventions: The use of brief experimental analysis and single case designs. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 463–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, A., & McDougall, D. (2008). Self-monitoring of pace to improve math fluency of high school students with disabilities. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1, 26–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Figarola, P., Gunter, P., Reffel, J., Worth, S., Hummel, J., & Gerber, B. (2008). Effects of self-graphing and goal setting on the math fact fluency of students with disabilities. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1, 36–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuchs, L., Butterworth, J., & Fuchs, D. (1989). Effects of ongoing curriculum-based measurement on student awareness of goals and progress. Education and Treatment of Children, 12, 63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C., & Whinnery, K. (1991). Effects of goal line feedback on level, slope, and stability of performance within curriculum-based measurement. Learning Disabilities Research, 6, 66–74.
   Google Scholar
• Hintze, J.M., Christ, T.J., & Keller, L.A. (2002). The generalizability of CBM survey-level mathematics assessments: Just how many samples do we need? School Psychology Review, 31, 514–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., & Tindal, G. (1994). Self-recording and goal-setting: Effects on on-task and math productivity of low-achieving Korean elementary school students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 4, 459–479.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, E.A., & Latham, G.P. (1990). Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel. Psychological Science, 1, 240–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E.A., & Latham, G.P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57, 705–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E.A., Shaw, K., Saari, L., & Latham, G. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, B., Witt, J., Elliot, S., & Darveaux, D. (1985). Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school-based interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16, 191–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, P., & Sideridis, G. (2006). Contrasting the effectiveness of fluency interventions for students with or at risk for learning disabilities: A multilevel random coefficient modeling meta-analysis. Learning Disabilities Research, 21, 191–210.
   Google Scholar
• Morisano, D., & Shore, B.M. (2010). Can personal goal setting tap the potential of the gifted underachiever? Roeper Review, 32, 249–258.
   Google Scholar
• National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Rhymer, K.N., & Cates, G.L. (2006). Student performance and preferences for mathematics word problems: An investigation of the effects of explicit timing and interspersal procedures. School Psychology Quarterly, 21, 34–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhymer, K.N., Henington, C., Skinner, C.H., & Looby, E.J. (1999). The effects of explicit timing on mathematics performance in second-grade Caucasian and African American students. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 397–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhymer, K.N., & Morgan, S.K. (2005). Comparison of the explicit timing and interspersal interventions: Analysis of problem completion rates, student preference, and teacher acceptability. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14, 283–303.
   Google Scholar
• Rhymer, K.N., Skinner, C.H., Henington, C., D’Reaux, R.A., & Sims, S. (1998). Effects of explicit timing on mathematics problem completion rates in African-American third-grade elementary students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 673–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhymer, K.N., Skinner, C.H., Jackson, S., McNeill, S., Smith, T., & Jackson, B. (2002). The 1-minute explicit timing intervention: The influence of mathematics problem difficulty. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 29, 305–311.
   Google Scholar
• Sagotsky, G., Patterson, C., & Lepper, M. (1978). Training children's self-control: A field experiment in self-monitoring and goal-setting in the classroom. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 25, 242–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E. (2004). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, K. (2005). CBM with goal setting: Impacting students’ understanding of reading goals. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32, 259–265.
   Google Scholar
• Throndsen, I. (2011). Self-regulated learning of basic arithmetic skill: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 558–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turco, T., & Elliot, S. (1986). Assessment of students’ acceptability ratings of teacher-initiated interventions for classroom misbehavior. Journal of School Psychology, 24, 277–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2011). FY 2010 Annual Performance Report. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Van Houten, R. (1979). The performance feedback system: Generalization of effects across time. Child Behavior Therapy, 1, 219–236.
   Google Scholar
• Van Houten, R., Morrison, E., Jarvis, R., & McDonald, M. (1974). The effects of explicit timing and feedback on compositional response rate in elementary school children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 547–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Houten, R., & Thompson, C. (1976). The effects of explicit timing on math performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 227–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar