Does Time Matter in Improving Mathematical Discussions? The Influence of Mathematical Autonomy

REFERENCES

• Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 1173–1182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & McNeal, B. (1992). Characteristics of classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 573–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Common Core Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Retrieved from http://corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2008). Basic psychological needs scales. Retrieved from http://www.psych.rochester.edu/SDT/measures/needs_scl.html
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E.L., Vallerand, R.J., Pelletier, L.G., & Ryan, R.M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26, 325–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, M.L., Webb, N.M., Chan, A.G., Ing, M., Freund, D., & Battey, D. (2009). Teacher questioning to elicit students’ mathematical thinking in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 380–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadanidas, G., Kotsopoulos, D., & Guembel, K.W. (2006). Factors effecting middle school teachers’ choice of authoritative discourse in teaching mathematics. In S. Alatorre, J.L. Cortina, M. Saiz, & A. Mendez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the North American chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 819–820). Merida, Yucatan, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Goos, M. (1995, October). How do you know when you understand? Using explanation to monitor and construct mathematical understanding. Paper presented at the Postgraduate Research Conference Commemorating 50 Years of Educational Studies at the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Wagner, D. (2010). Appraising lexical bundles in mathematics classroom discourse. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75, 43–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1993). Instructional tasks, classroom discourse, and students’ learning in second-grade arithmetic. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 393–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H.C. (2005). Content across communities: Validating measures of elementary mathematics instruction. Educational Policy, 19, 447–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hufferd-Ackles, K., Fuson, K.C., & Sherin, M.G. (2004). Describing levels and components of a math-talk learning community. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 81–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (2003). Trends in international mathematics and science study: Student questionnaire grade 8. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/timss/pdf/2003_8th_grade_Student_Questionnaire.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, A. (2008). An investigation of relationships between seventh-grade students’ beliefs and their participation during mathematics discussions in two classrooms. Mathematical Thinking & Learning, 10, 68–100.
   Google Scholar
• Kazemi, E., & Stipek, D. (2001). Promoting conceptual thinking in four upper-elementary mathematics classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 102, 59–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koichu, B., Berman, A., & Moore, M. (2007). The effect of promoting heuristic literacy on the mathematical aptitude of middle-school students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kosko, K.W. (2010). Mathematical discussion and self-determination theory (Doctoral dissertation). Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kosko, K.W. (2012a). Geometry students’ hedged statements and their self-regulation of mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31, 489–499.
   Google Scholar
• Kosko, K.W. (2012b). Student enrollment in classes with frequent mathematical discussion and its longitudinal effect on mathematics achievement. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 9, 111–148.
   Google Scholar
• Kosko, K.W., & Miyazaki, Y. (2009). Compound effects of mathematics discussion on fifth grade math achievement. In S.L. Swars, D.W. Stinson, & S. Lemons-Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 284–287). Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University.
   Google Scholar
• Kosko, K.W., & Miyazaki, Y. (2012). The effect of student discussion frequency on fifth graders’ mathematics achievement in U.S. schools. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80, 173–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosko, K.W., Rougee, A., & Herbst, P. (in press). What actions do teachers envision when asked to facilitate mathematical argumentation in the classroom? Mathematics Education Research Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Kosko, K.W., & Wilkins, J.L. M. (2012). Students’ quality of mathematical discussion and their self-determination in mathematics. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 4, 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Krummheuer, G. (2007). Argumentation and participation in the primary mathematics classroom: Two episodes and related theoretical abductions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26, 60–82.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. (2006). Language for learning mathematics: Assessment for learning in practice. New York, NY: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., Spybrook, J., Congdon, R., Martinez, A., & Raudenbush, S.W. (2009). Optimal design software for multi-level and longitudinal research (Version 3.01) [Computer software]. . Retrieved from http://sitemaker.umich.edu/group-based/optimal_design_software
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., & Sams, C. (2006). Teaching children how to use language to solve maths problems. Language and Education, 20, 507–528.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Education longitudinal study of 2002: Student questionnaire bases year 10th grade. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/els2002/pdf/StudentQ_baseyear.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nunnaly, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms. New York, NY: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S.W., Bryk, A.S., Cheong, Y.F., & Congdon, R.T. (2004). HLM 6 [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: SSI.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., Nix, G., & Hamm, D. (2003). Testing models of the experience of self-determination in intrinsic motivation and the conundrum of choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 375–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing high school students’ engagement by increasing their teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 147–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, J.D., & Willett, J.B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staples, M. (2007). Supporting whole-class collaborative inquiry in a secondary mathematics classroom. Cognition & Instruction, 25, 161–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanou, C.R., Perencivich, K.C., DiCintio, M., & Turner, J.C. (2004). Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage students’ decision making and ownership. Educational Psychologist, 39, 97–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatsis, K., & Koleza, E. (2004). The effect of students’ roles on the establishment of shared meanings during problem solving. In N. Pateman, B. Dougherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th PME Conference (Vol. 83, pp. 289–296). Bergen, Norway: PME.
   Google Scholar
• Truxaw, M.P., & DeFranco, T.C. (2007). Lessons from Mr. Larson: An inductive model of teaching for orchestrating discourse. Mathematics Teacher, 101, 268–272.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J.C., Meyer, D.K., Cox, K.E., Locan, C., DiCintio, M., & Thomas, C. (1998). Creating contexts for involvement in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 730–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, D. (2007). Students’ critical awareness of voice and agency in mathematics classroom discourse. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9, 31–50.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, S.R., & Baxter, J.A. (1996). Dilemmas of discourse-oriented teaching in one middle school mathematics classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 97, 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahner, W., & Moschkovich, J. (2010). The social organization of a middle school mathematics group discussion. In R. Lesh, P.L. Galbraith, C.R. Haines, & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competences (pp. 373–383), New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar