793
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
MOTIVATION AND SOCIAL PROCESSES

In the Eye of the Beholder: Motivational Effects of Gender Differences in Perceptions of Teachers

References

  • Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Van den Berghe, L., De Meyer, J., & Haerens, L. (2014). Fostering a need-supportive teaching style: Intervention effects on physical education teachers' beliefs and teaching behaviors. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 36(6), 595–609. doi:10.1123/jsep.2013-0229.
  • Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
  • Anderman, E. M., & Young, A. J. (1994). Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 811–831. doi:10.1002/tea.3660310805
  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). Amos (Version 7.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
  • Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15, 397–413.
  • Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students' engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 261–278. doi: 10.1348/000709902158883
  • Barkley, C. L., & Gabriel, K. I. (2007). Sex differences in cue perception in a visual scene: Investigation of cue type. Behavioral Neuroscience, 121, 291–300. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.121.2.291
  • Benjamin, L. S., & Wonderlich, S. A. (1994). Social perceptions and borderline personality disorder: The relation to mood disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 610–624. doi:10.1037//0021-843X.103.4.610
  • Bettencourt, B. A., Dill, K. E., Greathouse, S. A., Charlton, K., & Mulholland, A. (1997). Evaluations of ingroup and outgroup members: The role of category-based expectancy violation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 244–275. doi:10.1006/jesp.1996.1323
  • Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740–756. doi:10.1002/1098-237X
  • Boggiano, A. K., & Katz, P. (1991). Maladaptive achievement patterns in children. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 35–52.
  • Brody, L. R. (1985). Gender differences in emotional development: A review of theories and research. Journal of Personality, 53, 102–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1985.tb00361.x
  • Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1974). Teacher-student relationships: Causes and consequences. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd edition). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Carli, L. L., LaFleur, S. J., & Loeber, C. C. (1995). Nonverbal behavior, gender, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1030–1041. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.68.6.1030
  • Clifton, R. A., Perry, R. P., Roberts, L. W., & Peter, T. (2008). Gender, psychological dispositions, and the academic achievement of college students. Research in Higher Education, 49, 684–703. doi:10.1007/s11162-008-9104-9
  • D'Ailly, H. (2003). Children's autonomy and perceived control in learning: A model of motivation and achievement in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 84–96. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.84
  • De Blide, J., Vansteenkiste, M., & Lens, W. (2011). Understanding the association between future time perspective and self-regulated learning through the lens of self-determination theory. Learning and Instruction, 21, 332–344. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.03.002
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2011). Levels of analysis, regnant causes of behavior, and well-being: The role of psychological needs. Psychological Inquiry, 22, 17–22. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2011.545978
  • Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagné, M., Leone, D. R., Usunov, J., & Kornazheva, P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former Eastern Bloc country. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 930–942. doi:10.1177/0146167201278002
  • Delamont, S. (1990). Sex role and the school (2nd ed.). Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2011). Levels of analysis, regnant causes of behavior, and well-being: The role of psychological needs. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Eagly, A. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Eccles, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. (1985). Classroom experiences and student gender: Are there differences and do they matter? In L. C. Wildinson & C. Marrert (Eds.), Gender influence in classroom interaction (pp. 79–114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ecdes, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage-environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for young adolescents Research on Motivation in Education, 3, 139–186.
  • Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Harold, R., & Blumenfeld, P. B. (1993). Age and gender differences in children's self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830–847. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02946.x
  • Epstein, J. L. (Ed.) (1981). The quality of school life. Lexington, MA: Lexington.
  • Farris, C., Treat, T. A., Viken, R. J., & McFall, R. M. (2008). Perceptual mechanisms that characterize gender differences in decoding women's sexual intent. Psychological Science, 19, 348–354. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02092.x
  • Fennema, E., & Peterson, P. L. (1985). Autonomous learning behavior: A possible explanation of gender-related differences in mathematics. In L. C. Wilkinson & C. B. Marrett (Eds.), Gender-related differences in classroom interactions (pp. 17–35). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  • Gambell, T. J., & Hunter, D. M. (1999). Rethinking gender differences in literacy. Canadian Journal of Education, 24(1), 1–16. doi:10.2307/1585767
  • Gara, M. A., Woolfolk, R. L., Cohen, B. D., Goldston, R. B., Allen L. A., & Novalany, J. (1993). Perception of self and other in major depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 93–100. doi:10.1037//0021-843X.102.1.93
  • Gentry, M., Gable, R. K., & Rizza, M. G. (2002). Students' perceptions of classroom activities: Are there grade-level and gender differences? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 539–544. doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.94.3.539
  • Greene, B. A., DeBacker, T. K., Ravindran, B., & Krows A. J. (1999). Goals, values, and beliefs as predictors of achievement and effort in high school mathematics classes. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 40, 421–458. doi: 10.1023/A:1018871610174
  • Gunnell, K. E., Mack, D. E., Wilson, P. M., & Adachi, J. (2011). Psychological needs as mediators? The relationship between leisure time physical activity and well-being in people diagnosed with osteoporosis. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 82, 794–798. doi:10.5641/027013611×13275192112302
  • Harris, F. H., III., & Harper, S. R. (2008). Masculinities go to community college: Understanding male identity socialization and gender role conflict. New Directions for Community Colleges, 142, 25–35. doi:10.1002/cc.322
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
  • Jenkins, R. (2009). Our students need more practice in actual thinking. Chronicle of Higher Education, 55, B18–B19.
  • Johnson, M. M., & Finney, S. J. (2010). Measuring basic needs satisfaction: Evaluating previous research and conducting new psychometric evaluations of the Basic Needs Satisfaction in General Scale. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 280–296. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.04.003
  • Jones, S. M., & Dindia, K. (2004). A meta-analytic perspective on sex equity in the classroom. Review of Educational Research, 74, 443–471. doi:10.3102/00346543074004443
  • Katz, I., Assor, A., & Kanat-Maymon, Y. (2008). A projective assessment of autonomous motivation in children: Correlational and experimental evidence. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 109–119. doi:10.1007/s11031-008-9086-0
  • Katz, I., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Bereby-Meyer, Y. (2006). Interest as a motivational resource: Feedback and gender matter, but interest makes the difference. Social Psychology of Education, 9, 27–42.
  • Katz, I., Buzukashvili, T., & Feingold, L. (2012). Homework stress: Construct validation of a measure. Journal of Experimental Education, 80, 405–421. doi:10.1080/00220973.2011.610389
  • Katz, I., & Cohen, R. (2014). Assessing autonomous motivation in students with cognitive impairment. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 39, 323–332.
  • Katz, I., Kaplan, A., & Buzukashvily, T. (2011). The role of parents' motivation in students' autonomous motivation for doing homework: The importance of parents' motivation and behavior. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 376–386. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.04.001
  • Katz, I., Kaplan, A., & Gueta, G. (2010). Students' needs, teachers' support, and motivation for doing homework: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Experimental Education, 78, 246–267. doi:10.1080/00220970903292868
  • Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Kenny, D. A., & La Voie, L. (1984). The social relations model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 142–182). Orlando, FL: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60144-6
  • Klapp Lekholm, A., & Cliffordson, C. (2009). Effects of student characteristics on grades in compulsory school. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15, 1–23. doi:10.1080/13803610802470425
  • Laurent, J., Catanzaro, S. J., Joiner, T. E., Rudolph, K. D., Potter, K. I., Lambert, S. … Gathright, T. (1999). A measure of positive and negative affect for children: Scale development and preliminary validation. Psychological Assessment, 11, 326–338. doi:10.1037//1040-3590.11.3.326
  • Levesque, C., Zuehlke, A. N., Stanek, L. R., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Autonomy and competence in German and American university students: A comparative study based on self-determination theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 68–84. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.68
  • Lightbody, P., Siann, G., Stocks, R., & Walsh, D. (1996). Motivation and attribution at secondary school: The role of gender. Educational Studies, 22, 13–25. doi:10.1080/0305569960220102
  • Liu, J. (1997). The emotional bond between teachers and students. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(2), 156–157.
  • Maehr, M. L. (1989). Thoughts about motivation. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 299–315). New York, NY: Academic.
  • Marsh, H. W., & Yeung, A. S. (1998). Longitudinal structural equation models of academic self-concept and achievement: Gender differences in the development of math and English constructs. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 705–738. doi:10.3102/00028312035004705
  • Mau, W., & Lynn, R. (2001). Gender differences on the scholastic aptitude test, the American college test and college grades. Educational Psychology, 21, 33–136. doi:10.1080/01443410020043832
  • McGeown, S., Goodwin, H., Henderson, N., & Wright, P. (2012). Gender differences in reading motivation: Does sex or gender identity provide a better account? Journal of Research in Reading, 35, 328–336. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01481.x
  • Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 351–373. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.004
  • Meece, J. L, & Jones, G. (1996). Gender differences in motivational and strategy use: Are girls rote learners? Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 33, 393–406. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199604)33:4
  • Middleton, M. J., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An unexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710–718. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.89.4.710
  • Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. J. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77–86. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.93.1.77
  • Mikulincer, M., & Horesh, N. (1999). Adult attachment style and the perception of others: The role of projective mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 1022–1034. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.1022
  • Moe, A. (2012). Gender difference does not mean genetic difference: Externalizing improves performance in mental rotation. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 20–24. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.001
  • Montagne, B., Kessels, R. P., Frigerio, E., DeHaan, E. H., & Perrett, D. I. (2005). Sex differences in the perception of affective facial expressions: Do men really lack emotional sensitivity? Cognitive Processing, 6, 136–141. doi:10.1007/s10339-005-0050-6
  • Moreira, J. M., de F'atima Silva, M., Moleiro, C., Aguiar, P., Andrez, M., Bernardes, S., & Afonso, H. (2003). Perceived social support as an offshoot of attachment style. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(3), 485–501. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00085-5
  • Mouratidis, A. A., Vansteenkiste, M., Sideridis, G., & Lens, W. (2011). Vitality and interest–enjoyment as a function of class-to-class variation in need-supportive teaching and pupils' autonomous motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 353. doi: 10.1037/a0022773
  • Mouratidis, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Sideridis, G. (2008). The motivating role of positive feedback in sport and physical education: Evidence for a motivational model Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30, 240–268. doi: 10.1037/a0022773
  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., & Kennedy, A. M. (2003). PIRLS 2001 International report: IEA's study of reading literacy achievement in primary schools in 35 countries. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
  • Nicholls, J. G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Okun, M. A., Braver, M. W., & Weir, R. M. (1990). Grade level differences in school satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 24(4), 419–427.
  • Patrick, H., Anderman, L. H., Ryan, A. M., Edelin, K. C., & Midgley, C. (2001). Teachers' communication of goal orientations in four fifth-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 102, 35–58.
  • Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44, 159–178. doi: 10.1080/00461520903028990
  • Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 209–218. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209
  • Royer, E., Moisan, S., Saint-Laurent, L., & Giasson, J. (1993). L'abandon scolaire et sa prévention [School dropout and its prevention]. Bulletin de Psychologie Scolaire et d'Orientation, 3, 131–151.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.57.5.749
  • Ryan, E. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  • Ryan, R. M., & Grolnick, W. S. (1986). Origins and pawns in the classroom. Self-report and projective assessments of individual differences in children's perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 550–558.
  • Rueckert, L., & Naybar, N. (2008). Gender differences in empathy: The role of the right hemisphere. Brain and Cognition, 67, 162–167. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.01.002
  • Sabatinelli, D., Flaish, T., Bradley, M. M., Fitzsimmons, J. R., & Lang, P. J. (2004). Affective picture perception: Gender differences in visual cortex? Neuroreport, 15, 1109–1112.
  • Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1986). Sexism in the classroom: From grade school to graduate school. Phi Delta Kappan, 67, 512–515. doi:10.1080/00405848609543230
  • Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How our schools cheat girls. New York, NY: Touchstone. doi:10.2307/2963385
  • Sadker, M., Sadker, D., & Klein, S. (1991). The issue of gender in elementary and secondary education. Review of Research in Education, 17, 269–334. doi:10.3102/0091732×017001269
  • Sheard, M. (2009). Hardiness commitment, gender, and age differentiate university academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 189–204. doi:10.1348/000709908×304406
  • Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Kasser, T. (2004). The independent effects of goal contents and motives on well-being: It's both what you pursue and why you pursue it. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 475–486. doi:10.1177/0146167203261883
  • Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
  • Spade, L. Z. (2004). Gender and education in the United States. In J. H. Ballantine & L. Z. Spade (Eds.) School and society. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
  • Srivastava, S., Guglielmo, S., & Beer, J. S. (2010). Perceiving others' personalities: Examining the dimensionality, assumed similarity to the self, and stability of perceiver effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 520–534. doi:10.1037/a0017057
  • Tennant, J. E., Demaray, M. K., Malecki, C. K., Terry, M. N., Clary, M., & Elzinga, N. (2015). Students' ratings of teacher support and academic and social-emotional well-being. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(4) 494–512. doi:10.1037/spq0000106
  • Tong, S. T., & Walther, J. B. (2011). Just say “no thanks”: Romantic rejection in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(4), 488–506.
  • Urdan, T. C., Kneisel, L., & Mason, V. (1999). The effect of particular instructional practices on student motivation: An exploration of teachers' and students' perceptions. In T. Urdan (Ed.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 11, pp. 123–158). Stamford, CT: JAI.
  • Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Deci and Ryan's self-determination theory: A view from the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 312–318.
  • Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M. S., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1161–1176. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.72.5.1161.
  • Vansteenkiste, M., Simmons, J., Braet, C., Bachman, C., & Deci, E. L. (2007). Promoting maintained weight loss through healthy lifestyle changes among severely obese children: An experimental test of self-determination theory. Unpublished manuscript, University of Ghent, Belgium.
  • Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Soenens, B., & Matos, L. (2005). Examining the impact of extrinsic versus intrinsic goal framing and internally controlling versus autonomy-supportive communication style upon early adolescents' academic achievement. Child Development, 76, 483–501. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00858.x.
  • Verkuyten, M., & Thijs, J. (2001). Ethnic and gender bias among Dutch and Turkish children in late childhood: The role of social context. Infant and Child Development, 10, 203–217. doi:10.1002/icd.279.
  • Winquist, L. A., Mohr, C. D., & Kenny, D. A. (1998). The female positivity effect in the perception of others. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 370–388. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1998.2221.
  • Wood, D., Harms, P., & Vazire, S. (2010). Perceiver effects as projective tests: What your perceptions of others say about you. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 174–190. doi: 10.1037/a0019390.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.