Student Perceptions of Autonomy-Supportive Instructional Interactions in the Middle Grades

References

• Assor, A. (2012). Allowing choice and nurturing an inner compass: Educational practices supporting students' need for autonomy. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 421–439). New York, NY: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15, 397–413. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students' engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 261–278. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709902158883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozack, A., Vega, R., McCaslin, M., & Good, T. (2008). Teacher support of student autonomy in comprehensive school reform classrooms. Teachers College Record, 110(11), 2389–2407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, P. B., & Walton, G. M. (2014). Cues of working together fuel intrinsic motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 169–184. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. L., & Garcia, J. (2014). Educational theory, practice, and policy and the wisdom of social psychology. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 13–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2372732214551559
   Google Scholar
• Crosnoe, R. (2011). Fitting in, standing out: Navigating the social challenges of high school to get an education. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Charms, R. (2013). Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1024–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Mittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119–161). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (1987). Transformation and school success: The politics and culture of educational achievement. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 18(4), 335–356. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1987.18.4.04x0023w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteban-Guitart, M., & Moll, L. C. (2014). Funds of identity: A new concept based on the funds of knowledge approach. Culture and Psychology, 20(1), 31–48. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354067X13515934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fern, E. F. (2001). Advanced focus group research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Flowerday, T., Schraw, G., & Stevens, J. (2004). The role of choice and interest in reader engagement. Journal of Experimental Education, 72(2), 93–114. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.72.2.93-114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In S.L. Christenson, A.L. Reschly, & C. Wylie Eds., Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763–782). New York, NY: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (2009). Methods and measures: The network of relationships inventory: Behavioral systems version. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33(5), 470–478. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165025409342634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., & Kunter, M. (2012). Effects of autonomy-supportive teaching on student learning and motivation. Journal of Experimental Education, 80(3), 284–316. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2011.573019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13(1), 21–43.
   Google Scholar
• Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children's learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 890–898. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.5.890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guay, F., Boggiano, A. K., & Vallerand, R. J. (2001). Autonomy support, intrinsic motivation, and perceived competence: Conceptual and empirical linkages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 643–650. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167201276001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafen, C. A., Allen, J. P., Mikami, A. Y., Gregory, A., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2012). The pivotal role of adolescent autonomy in secondary school classrooms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(3), 245–255. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9739-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamre, B., Hatfield, B., Pianta, R., & Jamil, F. (2014). Evidence for general and domain-specific elements of teacher–child interactions: Associations with preschool children's development. Child Development, 85(3), 1257–1274. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennick, M. M. (2014). Focus group discussions: Understanding qualitative research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herman-Giddens, M. E., Steffes, J., Harris, D., Slora, E., Hussey, M., Dowshen, S. A. … Reiter, E. O. (2012). Secondary sexual characteristics in boys: Data from the Pediatric Research in Office Settings Network. Pediatrics, 130(5), e1058–e1068. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-3291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hospel, V., & Galand, B. (2015). Are both classroom autonomy support and structure equally important for students' engagement? A multilevel analysis. Learning and Instruction, 41, 1–10. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2012). Longitudinal test of self-determination theory's motivation mediation model in a naturally occurring classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1175–1188. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, I., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Bereby-Meyer, Y. (2006). Interest as a motivational resource: Feedback and gender matter, but interest makes the difference. Social Psychology of Education, 9(1), 27–42. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11218-005-2863-7
   Google Scholar
• Lepper, M. R., & Woolverton, M. (2002). The wisdom of practice: Lessons learned from the study of highly effective tutors. Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education, 135–158.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, R. M., & Lerner, J. V. (2013). The positive development of youth: Comprehensive findings from the 4-H study of positive youth development (pp. 1–54), Boston, MA: Tufts University.
   Google Scholar
• Patall, E. A. (2013). Constructing motivation through choice, interest, and interestingness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 522. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patall, E. A, Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 270–300. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Wynn, S. R. (2010). The effectiveness and relative importance of choice in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 896. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patall, E. A., Dent, A. L., Oyer, M., & Wynn, S. R. (2013). Student autonomy and course value: The unique and cumulative roles of various teacher practices. Motivation and Emotions, 37(1), 14–32. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9305-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick, H., & Ryan, A. M. (2008). What do students think about when evaluating their classroom's mastery goal structure? An examination of young adolescents' explanations. Journal of Experimental Education, 77(2), 99–124. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.77.2.99-124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S.L. Christenson, A.L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). New York, NY: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2006). Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 225–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivation style toward students and how they can become more autonomy-supportive. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 159–175. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520903028990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209–218. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., Nix, G., & Hamm, D. (2003). Testing models of the experience of self-determination in intrinsic motivation and the conundrum of choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 375–392. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogat, T. M., Witham, S. A., & Chinn, C. (2014). Teachers' autonomy-relevant practices within an inquiry-based science curricular context: Extending the range of academically significant autonomy-supportive practices. Teachers College Record, 116, 1–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (2011). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. Padstow, Cornwall: Pinter and Martin.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749–761. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (p. 14). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (2009). Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational development. In K. R. Wentzel, & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 223–246). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanou, C. R., Perencevich, K. C., DiCintio, M., & Turner, J. C. (2004). Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 97–110. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toshalis, E. (2015). Make me!: Understanding and engaging student resistance in school. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toshalis, E., & Nakkula, M. J. (2012). Motivation, engagement, and student voice: Students at the center: Teaching and learning in the era of the common core (pp. 1–42). Boston, MA: Jobs for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Urdan, T., Kneisel, L., & Mason, V. (1999). The effect of particular instructional practices on student motivation: An exploration of teachers and students' perceptions. In T. Urdan (Ed.), Advances in motivation and achievement. Volume 11: Motivation in context (pp. 123–158). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, T. L., & Chhuon, V. (2014). Proximal processes in urban classrooms engagement and disaffection in urban youth of color. American Educational Research Journal, 51(5), 937–973. doi: 10.3102/0002831214531324
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, T. L., Sung, H. C., & Williams, J. D. (2014).The defining features of teacher talk within autonomy-supportive classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 42, 34–46. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2014.04.005
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. D., Woodson, A. N., & Wallace, T. L. (2016). “Can we say the N-word?”: Exploring psychological safety during race talk. Research in Human Development, 13(1), 15–31. doi: 10.1080/15427609.2016.1141279
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. D., Wallace, T. L., & Sung, H. C. (2015). Providing choice the middle grades: An exploratory study of enactment variability and student reflection. Journal of Early Adolescence. doi: 10.1177/0272431615570057
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12–23. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar