When Mastery Goals Meet Mastery Learning: Administrator, Teacher, and Student Perceptions

References

• Ames, C. A. (1992a). Achievement goals and the classroom motivational climate. In D. H. Schunk & J. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 327–348). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ames, C. A. (1992b). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anania, J. (1982). The effects of quality of instruction on the cognitive and affective learning of students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 4269A.
   Google Scholar
• Anderman, E. M., Anderman, L. H., Yough, M. S., & Gimbert, B. G. (2010). Value-added models of assessment: Implications for motivation and accountability. Educational Psychologist, 45(2), 123–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderman, E. M., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Roeser, R., Wigfield, A., & Blumenfeld, P. (2001). Learning to value mathematics and reading: Relations to mastery- and performance-oriented instructional practices. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 76–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderman, E. M., & Wolters, C. A. (2006). Goals, values, and affect. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 369–390). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Anderman, L. H., Andrzejewski, C., & Allen, J. (2011). How do teachers support students’ motivation and learning in their classrooms? Teachers College Record, 113, 969–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderman, L. H., Patrick, H., Hruda, L. Z., & Linnenbrink, E. A. (2002). Observing classroom goal structures to clarify and expand goal theory. In C. Midgley (Ed.), Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning (pp. 243–278). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Anderman, L. H., Patrick, H., & Ryan, A. M. (2004). Creating adaptive motivational environments in the middle grades. Middle School Journal, 35(4), 33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment, 1(2), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1971). Mastery learning. In J. H. Block (Ed.), Mastery learning: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1974). Time and learning. American Psychologist, 29, 682–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, A. J. (1983). Students’ potential for learning contrasted under tutorial and group approaches to instruction. Dissertation Abstracts International, 44, 2025A.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, J. R. (1997). Examining the validity structure of qualitative research. Education, 118, 282–293.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darnon, C., Harackiewicz, J., Butera, F., Mugny, G., & Quiamzade, A. (2007). Performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals: When uncertainty makes a difference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 813–827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). Eight ways to promote generative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 717–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, M. C., Musu-Gillette, L. E., Woolley, M. E., Karabenick, S. A., Strutchens, M. E., & Martin, W. G. (2014). Student perceptions of the classroom environment: Relations to motivation and achievement in mathematics. Learning Environmental Resources, 17, 287–304.
   Google Scholar
• Gilgun, J. F. (2004). Deductive qualitative analysis and family theory-building. In V. Bengston, P. Dillworth Anderson, K. Allen, A. Acock, & D. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 83–84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gilgun, J. F. (2010). A primer on deductive qualitative analysis as theory testing and theory development. Current Issues in Qualitative Research, 1(3), 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Gilgun, J. F. (2013). Grounded theory, deductive qualitative analysis, and social work research and practice. Qualitative Research in Social Work, 107–135.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, H., & Dweck, C. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2007). Closing achievement gaps: Revisiting Benjamin S. Bloom's “Learning for mastery.” Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(1), 8–31.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2010). Lessons of mastery learning. Educational Leadership, 68(2), 52–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R., & Anderman, E. M. (2013). In search of a useful definition of mastery. Educational Leadership, 71(4), 19–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R., & Pigott, T. D. (1988). Research on group-based mastery learning programs: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Educational Research, 81(4), 197–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A., Gheen, M., & Midgley, C. (2002). Classroom goal structure and student disruptive behaviour. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 191–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karabenick, S. A. (2004). Perceived achievement goal structure and college student help seeking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 569–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, C. L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Bangert-Downs, R. L. (1990). Effectiveness of mastery learning programs: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 60, 265–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liem, G. A. D. (2016). Academic and social achievement goals: Their additive, interactive, and specialized effects on school functioning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 37–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). The dilemma of performance-approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students ’ motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 197–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maehr, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1991). Enhancing student motivation: A schoolwide approach. Educational Psychologist, 26, 399–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maehr, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1996). Transforming school cultures. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, H. H., & Weinstein, R. S. (1986). Classroom context of student-perceived differential teacher treatment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 441–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J. (2006). Personal bests (PBs): A proposed multidimensional model and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 803–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J. (2013). Improving the achievement, motivation, and engagement of students with ADHD: The role of Personal Best goals and other growth-based approaches. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 23, 143–155.
   Google Scholar
• Meece, J. L. (1991). The classroom context and children's motivational goals. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in achievement motivation research (pp. 261–85). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meece, J., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Structures and goals of educational settings: Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. In S. T. Fiske, A. E. Kazdin, & D. L. Schacter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 57, pp. 487–504). Stanford, CA: Annual Reviews.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, H. (2004). Re-examining classroom mastery goal structure. In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Motivating students, improving schools: The legacy of Carol Midgley (pp. 233–264). New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, H., Anderman, L. H., & Ryan, A. M. (2002). Social motivation and the classroom social environment. In C. Midgley (Ed.), Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning (pp. 85–108). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, H., Anderman, L. H., Ryan, A. M., Edelin, K. C., & Midgley, C. (2001). Teachers’ communication of goal orientations in four fifth-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 102, 35–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick, H., Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., & Midgley, C. (2003). How teachers establish psychological environments during the first days of school: Associations with avoidance behaviors in mathematics. Teachers College Record, 105, 1521–1558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502) San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1969). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Senko, C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2011). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46, 26–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., & Meyer, D. K. (2004). Are challenge and caring compatible in middle school mathematics classrooms?. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Motivating students, improving schools: The legacy of Carol Midgley (pp. 331–360). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., & Patrick, H. (2004). Motivational influences on student participation in classroom learning activities. Teachers College Record, 106, 1759–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urdan, T. (2004). Predictors of academic self-handicapping and achievement: Examining achievement goals, classroom goal structures, and culture. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 251–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urdan, T. (2004b). Can achievement goal theory guide school reform? In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement, Vol 13. Motivating students, improving schools: The legacy of Carol Midgley, (pp. 361–392). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Urdan, T., Midgley, C., & Anderman, E. M. (1998). The role of classroom goal structure in students’ use of self-handicapping strategies. America Educational Research Journal, 35, 101–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urdan, T., Ryan, A., Anderman, E. A., & Gheen, M. (2002). Avoidance behaviors and the learning context. In C. Midgley (Ed.), Understanding adolescent students’ motivation: A longitudinal study (pp. 55–84). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Fact sheet: Testing action plan [Press release]. Retrieved from www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/fact-sheet-testing-action-plan
   Google Scholar