Brief Research Report: Growth Models With Small Samples and Missing Data

References

• Allison, P. D. (2012, April 23). Handling missing data by maximum likelihood (Keynote presentation at the SAS Global Forum, Orlando, Florida). Retrieved from http://www.statisticalhorizons.com/wp-content/uploads/MissingDataByML.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling (pp. 243–277). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Azur, M. J., Stuart, E. A., Frangakis, C., & Leaf, P. J. (2011). Multiple imputation by chained equations: What is it and how does it work? International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 20, 40–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S. A., Lindborg, S. R., & Seaman, J. W. (2006). Multiple imputation techniques in small sample clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine, 25, 233–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beunckens, C., Molenberghs, G., & Kenward, M. G. (2005). Direct likelihood analysis versus simple forms of imputation for missing data in randomized clinical trials. Clinical Trials, 2, 379–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodner, T. E. (2008). What improves with increased missing data imputations? Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 651–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. 2006. Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, J. V. (1978). Robustness? British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31, 144–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, W. J., & Draper, D. (2006). A comparison of Bayesian and likelihood-based methods for fitting multilevel models. Bayesian Analysis, 1, 473–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M. W. L. (2013). Implementing restricted maximum likelihood estimation in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 157–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, P. J. (2003). Have multilevel models been structural equation models all along? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 529–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, P. J., Obeidat, K., & Losardo, D. (2010). Twelve frequently asked questions about growth curve modeling. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11, 121–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delucchi, K., & Bostrom, A. (1999). Small sample longitudinal clinical trial with missing data: A comparison of analytic methods. Psychological Methods, 4, 158–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K. (2001). A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 128–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 430–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foulley, J. L., Jaffrézic, F., & Robert-Granié, C. (2000). EM-REML estimation of covariance parameters in Gaussian mixed models for longitudinal data analysis. Genetics Selection Evolution, 32, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. W., Olchowski, A. E., & Gilreath, T. D. (2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8, 206–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. W., & Schafer, J. L. (1999). On the performance of multiple imputation for multivariate data with small sample size. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 1–29). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, G. R., Kuo, W. L., & Lawrence, F. R. (2001). An illustration of second-order latent growth models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 470–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogland, J. J., & Boomsma, A. (1998). Robustness studies in covariance structure modeling: An overview and a meta-analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 26, 329–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, N. J., & Kleinman, K. P. (2007). Much ado about nothing. The American Statistician, 61, 79–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, N. J., & Lipsitz, S. R. (2001). Multiple imputation in practice: Comparison of software packages for regression models with missing variables. American Statistician, 55, 244–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, J. G. (1990). Incomplete data in generalized linear models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 765–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenward, M. G., & Roger, J. H. (1997). Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics, 53, 983–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (1982). Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics, 38, 963–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeish, D. (2017a). Missing data methods for arbitrary missingness with small samples. Journal of Applied Statistics, 44, 24–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeish, D. (2017b). Small sample methods for multilevel modeling: A colloquial elucidation of REML and the Kenward-Roger correction. Multivariate Behavioral Research. Advance online publication. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2017.1344538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeish, D. (2016). Using data-dependent priors to mitigate small sample size bias in latent growth models: A discussion and illustration using Mplus. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 41, 27–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeish, D., & Harring, J. R. (2017). Correcting model fit criteria for small sample latent growth models with incomplete data. Educational and Psychological Measurement. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0013164416661824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, P. D., & West, S. G. (2000). Putting the individual back into individual growth curves. Psychological Methods, 5, 23–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 599–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., Wichman, A. L., MacCallum, R. C., & Briggs, N. E. (2008). Latent growth curve modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaalje, G. B., McBride, J. B., & Fellingham, G. W. (2002). Adequacy of approximations to distributions of test statistics in complex mixed linear models. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 7, 512–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer, J. L., & Olsen, M. K. (1998). Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: A data analyst's perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 545–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London, UK: Chapman & Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Seaman, S. R., & Hughes, R. A. (2016). Relative efficiency of joint-model and full-conditional-specification multiple imputation when conditional models are compatible: The general location model. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0962280216665872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, A., Laird, N., & Schoenfeld, D. (1997). A random-effects model for multiple characteristics with possibly missing data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92, 775–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, T., Davison, M. L., & Long, J. D. (2016). Maximum likelihood versus multiple imputation for missing data in small longitudinal samples with nonnormality. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/met0000094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, T., Davison, M. L., & Long, J. D. (2009). Effects of missing data methods in structural equation modeling with nonnormal longitudinal data. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 70–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Buuren, S., Boshuizen, H. C., & Knook, D. L. (1999). Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 18, 681–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers, A. J. (2003). How many repeated measures in repeated measures designs? Statistical issues for comparative trials. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 3, 1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vink, G., Frank, L. E., Pannekoek, J., & Buuren, S. (2014). Predictive mean matching imputation of semicontinuous variables. Statistica Neerlandica, 68, 61–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, P. T. (2016). New confidence intervals and bias comparisons show that maximum likelihood can beat multiple imputation in small samples. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 422–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, I. R., Royston, P., & Wood, A. M. (2011). Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Statistics in Medicine, 30, 377–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, I. R., & Carlin, J. B. (2010). Bias and efficiency of multiple imputation compared with complete-case analysis for missing covariate values. Statistics in Medicine, 29, 2920–2931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, W., & Lang, K. M. (2016). Proportionality assumption in latent basis curve models: A cautionary note. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 140–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, W., West, S. G., & Taylor, A. B. (2009). Evaluating model fit for growth curve models: Integration of fit indices from SEM and MLM frameworks. Psychological Methods, 14, 183–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar