The Relevance of Relevance for Learning and Performance

References

• Acee, T. W., & Weinstein, C. E. (2010). Effects of value-reappraisal intervention on statistics students' motivation and performance. Journal of Experimental Education, 78, 487–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acee, T., Weinstein, C. E., Hoang, T., & Flaggs, D. (this issue). Value reappraisal as a conceptual model for task-value interventions. Journal of Experimental Education.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht, J., & Karabenick, S. (this issue). Introduction to the special issue on relevance for learning and motivation in education. Journal of Experimental Education.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A. (2017, September 9). Ed Talk: Re-educating the mind. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozIapr_MmU8&t=40s
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., & Knight, S. L. (1993). Dimensions of the interplay between learning and teaching. Educational Forum, 57, 232–245. doi:10.1080/00131729309335422
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (1998). The research base for APA's learner-centered principles. In N. M. Lambert & B. L. McCombs (Eds.), Issues in school reform: A sampler of psychological perspectives on learner-centered schools (pp. 25–60). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., & Woods, B. S. (1996). Of squalls and fathoms: Navigating the seas of educational innovation. Educational Researcher, 25(3), 31–36, 39.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., & Woods, B. S. (1997). Unearthing academic roots: Educators' perceptions of the interrelationship of philosophy, psychology, and education. Educational Forum, 61, 172–186. doi:10.1080/00131729709335248
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., & Riconscente, M. M. (2005). A matter of proof: Why achievement ≠ learning. In J. S. Carlson & J. R. Levin (Eds.), The No Child Left Behind legislation: Educational research and federal funding (pp. 27–36). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., & Reynolds, R. E. (2009). What is learning anyway? A topographical perspective considered. Educational Psychologist, 44, 209–214. doi:10.1080/00461520903029006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderman, E. M., & Maehr, M. L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational Research, 64, 287–309. doi:10.3102/00346543064002287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergin, D. A., Ford, M. E., & Hess, R. D. (1993). Patterns of motivation and social behavior associated with microcomputer use of young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 437–445. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canning, E. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2015). Teach it, don't preach it: The differential effects of directly communicated and self-generated utility-value information. Motivation Science, 1, 47–71. doi:10.1037/mot0000015
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1897). My pedagogic creed. School Journal, 54, 77–80.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Mac lver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents' experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48, 90–101. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, G. (2008). Grand challenges for engineering. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 37(1), 3–3. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Retrieved from www.engineeringchallenges.org/cms/8996/9127.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Gaspard, H., Dicke, A.-L., Flunger, B., Schreier, B., HaÅNfner, I., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2015). More value through greater differentiation: Gender differences in value beliefs about math. Journal of Educational Psychology 107(3), 663–677. doi:10.1037/edu0000003
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, R., & Greeno, J. G. (1989). On the nature of competence: Principles for understanding in a domain. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 125–186). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz, J. M., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., Priniski, S. J., & Hyde, J. S. (2016). Closing achievement gaps with a utility-value intervention: Disentangling race and social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 745–765. doi:10.1037/pspp0000075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwell, M., & Kaplan, A. (this issue). Students' personal connection with science: Investigating the multidimensional phenomenological structure of relevance. Journal of Experimental Education.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koedinger, K., Alibali, M., & Nathan, M. (2008). Trade-offs between grounded and abstract representations: Evidence from algebra problem solving. Cognitive Science, 32, 366–397. doi:10.1080/03640210701863933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagengast, B., Brisson, B., Hulleman, C., Gaspard, H., Häfner, I., & Trautwein, U. (this issue). Learning more from educational intervention studies: Estimating complier-average-causal-effects in a relevance intervention. Journal of Experimental Education.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priniski, S., Hecht, C., & Harackiewicz, J. (this issue). Making learning personally meaningful: A new framework for relevance research. Journal of Experimental Education.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, E. Q., & Wigfield, A. (2016). STEM motivation interventions for adolescents: A promising start, but further to go. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 146–163. doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1154792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffler, I. (1969). Reflections on educational relevance. Journal of Philosophy, 66, 764–773. doi:10.2307/2023779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W. H., Houang, R., & Cogan, L. S. (2011). Preparing future math teachers. Science, 332(603), 1266–1267. doi:10.1126/science.1193855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, M., Aelterman, N., De Muynck, G., Haerens, L., Patall, E., & Reeve, J. (this issue). Fostering personal meaning and self-relevance: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization. Journal of Experimental Education.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkington, C., Bernacki, M., & Alexander, P. A. Personalization of instruction: Design principles and implications for cognition. Journal of Experimental Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. (2013). Why students choose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1081–1121. doi:10.3102/0002831213488622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whewell, W. (1840). The philosophy of inductive sciences. London, UK: Parker.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar