On Sample-Size Calculations for Precise Contrast Analysis in ANCOVA

References

• American Educational Research Association Task Force on Reporting of Research Methods. (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educational Research, 35, 33–40. doi:10.3102/0013189X035006033
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. W. (2003). An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, J. F., Seifert-Kessell, N., & Jones, L. A. (1992). Effect of think-aloud instruction on elementary students' comprehension monitoring abilities. Journal of Reading, 24, 143–172.
   Google Scholar
• Binkley, J. K., & Abbot, P. C. (1987). The fixed X assumption in econometrics: Can the textbooks be trusted? The American Statistician, 41, 206–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase, G. R., & Bulgren, W. G. (1971). A Monte Carlo investigation of the robustness of T2. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 499–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, E. M., & Appelbaum, M. I. (1978). The validity of polynomial regression in the random regression model. Review of Educational Research, 48, 511–515. doi:10.3102/00346543048004511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everitt, B. S. (1979). A Monte Carlo investigation of the robustness of Hotelling's one- and two-sample T2 tests. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 48–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gail, M. H., Wieand, S., & Piantadosi, S. (1984). Biased estimates of treatment effect in randomized experiments with non-linear regression and omitted covariates. Biometrika, 71, 431–444. doi:10.1093/biomet/71.3.431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauck, W. W., Anderson, S., & Marcus, S. M. (1998). Should we adjust for covariates in nonlinear regression analyses of randomized trials? Control Clinical Trials, 19, 249–256. doi:10.1016/S0197-2456(97)00147-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hauck, W. W., Neuhaus, J. M., Kalbfleisch, J. D., & Anderson, S. (1991). A consequence of omitted covariates when estimating odds ratios. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44, 77–81. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(91)90203-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez, A. V., Steyerberg, E. W., & Habbema, J. D. F. (2004). Covariate adjustment in randomized controlled trials with dichotomous outcomes increases statistical power and reduces sample size requirements. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57, 454–460. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochberg, Y., & Varon-Salomon, Y. (1984). On simultaneous pairwise comparisons in analysis of covariance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 863–866. doi:10.1080/01621459.1984.10477103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, L. N., & Dunn, O. J. (1967). The robustness of Hotelling's T2. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 124–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, J. W., & Clay, P. P. F. (1963). Some empirical distributions of bivariate T2 and homoscedasticity criterion M under unequal variance and leptokurtosis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 1048–1053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huitema, B. (2011). The analysis of covariance and alternatives: Statistical methods for experiments, quasi-experiments, and single-case studies (Vol. 608). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., & Balakrishnan, N. (1995). Continuous univariate distributions (2nd ed., Vol. 2). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kariya, T. (1981a). A robustness property of Hotelling's T2-test. Annals of Statistics, 9, 211–214. doi:10.1214/aos/1176345350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kariya, T. (1981b). Robustness of multivariate tests. Annals of Statistics, 9, 1267–1275. doi:10.1214/aos/1176345643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keppel, G., & Wickens, T. D. (2004). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, R. E. (2013). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kupper, L. L., & Hafner, K. B. (1989). How appropriate are popular sample size formulas? The American Statistician, 43, 101–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, K., & Kelley, K. (2012). Accuracy in parameter estimation for ANCOVA and ANOVA contrasts: Sample size planning via narrow confidence intervals. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 65, 350–370. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2011.02029.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (2004). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Muirhead, R. J. (1982). Aspects of multivariate statistical theory. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Negassa, A., & Hanley, J. A. (2007). The effect of omitted covariates on confidence interval and study power in binary outcome analysis: A simulation study. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 28, 242–248. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2006.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pocock, S. J., Assmann, S. E., Enos, L. E., & Kasten, L. E. (2002). Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparison in clinical trial reporting: Current practice and problems. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 2917–2930. doi:10.1002/sim.1296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software and manual]. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Raab, G. M., Day, S., & Sales, J. (2000). How to select covariates to include in the analysis of a clinical trial. Controlled Clinical Trials, 21, 330–342. doi:10.1016/S0197-2456(00)00061-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rencher, A. C., & Schaalje, G. B. (2007). Linear models in statistics (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, A. R. (1974). A tale of two regressions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 682–689. doi:10.1080/01621459.1974.10480189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute. (2014). SAS/IML user's guide, Version 9.3. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Shieh, G. (2011). The impact of ignoring random features of predictor and moderator variables on sample size for precise interval estimation of interaction effects. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 1075–1084. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0103-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, L., and American Psychological Association Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594–604. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.8.594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar