Students' Agentic Engagement Predicts Longitudinal Increases in Perceived Autonomy-Supportive Teaching: The Squeaky Wheel Gets the Grease

References

• Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Van den Berghe, L., De Meyer, J., & Haerens, L. (2014). Fostering a need-supportive teaching style: Intervention effects on physical education teachers' beliefs and teaching behaviors. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 36(6), 595–609. doi:10.1123/jsep.2013-0229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students' engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 261–278. doi:10.1348/000709902158883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15, 397–413. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatzisarantis, N. L., & Hagger, M. S. (2009). Effects of an intervention based on self-determination theory on self-reported leisure-time physical activity participation. Psychology and Health, 24, 29–48. doi:10.1080/08870440701809533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheon, S. H., & Reeve, J. (2015). A classroom-based intervention to help teachers decrease students' amotivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 99–111. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Moon, I. S. (2012). Experimentally based, longitudinally designed, teacher-focused intervention to help physical education teachers be more autonomy supportive toward their students. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34, 365–396. doi:10.1123/jsep.34.3.365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Song, Y.-G. (2016). A teacher-focused intervention to decrease PE students' amotivation by increasing need satisfaction and decreasing need frustration. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 38, 217–235. doi:10.1123/jsep.2015-0236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., Schwartz, A. J., Sheinman, L., & Ryan, R. M. (1981). An instrument to assess adults' orientations toward control versus autonomy with children: Reflections on intrinsic motivation and perceived competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 642–650. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.73.5.642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Meyer, J., Tallir, I. B., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Aelterman, N., Van den Berghe, L., … Haerens, L. (2014). Does observed controlling teaching behavior relate to students' motivation in physical education? Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 541–554. doi:10.1037/a0034399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haerens, L., Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & Van Petegem, S. (2015). Do perceived autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching relate to physical education students' motivational experiences through unique pathways? Distinguishing between the bright and dark side of motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16, 26–36. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. K. (2001). The next generation of the ITC test translation and adaptation guidelines. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 164–172. doi:10.1027//1015-5759.17.3.164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2012). Longitudinal test of self-determination theory's motivation mediation model in a naturally-occurring classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1175–1188. doi:10.1037/a0028089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27–38. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Halusic, M. (2016). A new autonomy-supportive way of teaching that increases conceptual learning: Teaching in students' preferred ways. Journal of Experimental Education, 84, 686–701. doi:10.1080/00220973.2015.1083522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., & Kim, A. (2009). Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically-oriented South Korean adolescents? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 644–661. doi:10.1037/a0014241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80 for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, G. W., & Dinella, L. M. (2009). Continuity and change in early school engagement: Predictive of children's achievement trajectories from first to eighth grade? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 190–206. doi:10.1037/a0013153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Dowson, M., Pietsch, J., & Walker, R. (2004). Why multicollinearity matters: A reexamination of relations between self-efficacy, self-concept, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 518–522. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., & Nagengast, B. (2009). Doubly-latent models of school contextual effects: Integrating multilevel and structural equation approaches to control measurement and sampling error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 764–802. doi:10.1080/00273170903333665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patall, E. A., Dent, A. L., Oyer, M., & Wynn, S. R. (2013). Student autonomy and course value: The relative and differential roles of various teacher practices. Motivation and Emotion, 37, 14–32. doi:10.1007/s11031-012-9305-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (1998). Autonomy support as an interpersonal motivating style: Is it teachable? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 312–330. doi:10.1006/ceps.1997.0975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44, 159–175. doi:10.1080/00461520903028990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595. doi:10.1037/a0032690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2016). Autonomy-supportive teaching: What it is, how to do it. In J. C. K. Wang, W. C. Liu, & R. M. Ryan's (Eds.), Building autonomous learners: Perspectives from research and practice using self-determination theory ( Chap. 5, pp. 129–152). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H. (2016). Teachers become more autonomy supportive after they believe it is easy to do. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 22, 178–189. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students' engagement by increasing teachers' autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 147–169. doi:10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students' engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 257–267. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, G., Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Kanat-Maymon, Y. (2007). Perceived autonomy in teaching: How self-determined teaching may lead to self-determined learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 761–774. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, G., & Weinstock, M. (2013). Teachers' epistemological beliefs as an antecedent of Autonomy-supportive teaching. Motivation and Emotion, 37, 402–412. doi:10.1007/s11031-012-9338-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samyn, V., Roeyers, H., Bijttebier, P., Rosseel, Y., & Wiersema, J. R. (2015). Assessing effortful control in typical and atypical development: Are questionnaires and neuropsychological measures interchangeable? A latent-variable analysis. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 36, 587–599. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senko, C., & Miles, K. M. (2008). Pursuing their own learning agenda: How mastery-oriented students jeopardize their class performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 561–583. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (2009). Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational development. In K. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation in school (pp. 223–245). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Berghe, L., Cardon, G., Tallir, I., Kirk, D., & Haerens, L. (2016). Dynamics of need-supportive and need-thwarting teaching behavior: The bidirectional relationship with student engagement and disengagement in the beginning of a lesson. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21, 653–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Soenens, B., & Matos, L. (2005). Examining the motivational impact of intrinsic versus extrinsic goal framing and autonomy-supportive versus internally controlling communication style on early adolescents' academic achievement. Child Development, 76, 483–501. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00858.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Soenens, B., & Lens, W. (2004). How to become a persevering exerciser? Providing a clear, future intrinsic goal in an autonomy-supportive way. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26, 232–249. doi:10.1123/jsep.26.2.232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 767–779. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar