Epistemic Perspective and Online Epistemic Processing of Evidence: Developmental and Domain Differences

References

• Bannert, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2008). Assessment of metacognitive skills by means of instruction to think aloud and reflect when prompted. Does the verbalisation method affect learning? Metacognition and Learning, 3(1), 39–58. doi:10.1007/s11409-007-9009-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., & Weinstock, M. (2015). Measuring epistemic thinking within and across topics: A scenario-based approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 141–158. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2014). Reconsidering personal epistemology as metacognition: A multifaceted approach to the analysis of epistemic thinking. Educational Psychologist, 49(1), 13–35. doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.863265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2016). Epistemic (meta)cognition: Ways of thinking about knowledge and knowing. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.). Handbook of epistemic cognition. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, S. A. J., & Bloom, P. (2007). The curse of knowledge in reasoning about false beliefs. Psychological Science, 18(5), 382–386. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01909.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braasch, J. L. G., Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., Steffens, B., & Strømsø, H. I. (2014). Sensitivity to inaccurate argumentation in health news articles: Potential contributions of readers’ topic and epistemic beliefs. In D. N. Rapp &, J. L. G. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., Strømsø, H. I., & Rouet, J. F. (2011). The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of multiple expository texts: Toward an integrated model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 48–70. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.538647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Salmerón, L. (2011). Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 180–192. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., Richter, T., & Rouet, J. (2014). Scientific literacy: The role of goal-directed reading and evaluation in understanding scientific information. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 104–122. doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.916217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromme, R., Pieschl, S., & Stahl, E. (2010). Epistemological beliefs are standards for adaptive learning: A functional theory about epistemological beliefs and metacognition. Metacognition and Learning, 5(1), 7–26. doi:10.1007/s11409-009-9053-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281. doi:10.3102/00346543065003245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 141–167. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.587722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Rinehart, R. W. (2016). Epistemic cognition and philosophy: Developing a new framework for epistemic cognition. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 835–866). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, L. E., & Bråten, I. (2013). Student profiles of knowledge and epistemic beliefs: Changes and relations to multiple-text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 25, 49–61. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H., & Miller, S. A. (2002). Cognitive development (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., Azevedo, R., & Torney-Purta, J. (2008). Modelling epistemic and ontological cognition: Philosophical perspectives and methodological directions. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 142–160. doi:10.1080/00461520802178458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., Muis, K. R., & Pieschl, S. (2010). The role of epistemic beliefs in students’ self-regulated learning with computer-based learning environments: Conceptual and methodological issues. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 245–257. doi:10.1080/00461520.2010.515932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., Sandoval, W. A., & Bråten, I. (2016). An introduction to epistemic cognition. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., Yu, S. B., & Copeland, D. Z. (2014). Measuring critical components of digital literacy and their relationships with learning. Computers and Education, 76, 55–69. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY, US: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451–470. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 43–55. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3901_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140. doi:10.3102/00346543067001088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K., & Sinatra, G. M. (2010). Epistemology, metacognition, and self-regulation: Musings on an emerging field. Metacognition and Learning, 5(1), 113–120. doi:10.1007/s11409-009-9051-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howitt, D., & Cramer, D. (2014). An introduction to statistics in psychology. Harlow, England, UK: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Iordanou, K. (2010). Developing argument skills across scientific and social domains. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11(3), 293–327. doi:10.1080/15248372.2010.485335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iordanou, K. (2016a). Developing epistemological understanding through argumentation in scientific and social domains. Special issue on learning through argumentation. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 30(2-3), 109–119. doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iordanou, K. (2016b). From theory of mind to epistemic cognition. A lifespan perspective. Frontline Learning Research, 4(5), 106–119. doi:10.14786/flr.v4i5.252
   Google Scholar
• Iordanou, K., & Constantinou, C. P. (2014). Developing pre-service teachers' evidence-based argumentation skills on socio-scientific issues. Learning and Instruction, 34, 42–57. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iordanou, K., & Constantinou, C. P. (2015). Supporting use of evidence in argumentation through practice in argumentation and reflection in the context of SOCRATES learning environment. Science Education, 99(2), 282–311. doi:10.1002/sce.21152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iordanou, K., Kendeou, P., & Beker, K. (2016). Argumentative reasoning. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition. (pp. 67–98). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Muis, K. R., & Fulton, S. (2011). Reader and text factors in reading comprehension processes. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(4), 365–383. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01436.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kitsantas, A., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Comparing self-regulatory processes among novice, non-expert, and expert volleyball players: A microanalytic study. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14(2), 91–105. doi:10.1080/10413200252907761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2001). How do people know? Psychological Science, 12(1), 1–8. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15(3), 309–328. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(00)00030-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Goh, W., Iordanou, K., & Shaenfield, D. (2008). Arguing on the computer: A microgenetic study of developing argument skills in a computer-supported environment. Child Development, 79(5), 1310–1328. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01190.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Iordanou, K., Pease, M., & Wirkala, C. (2008). Beyond control of variables: What needs to develop to achieve skilled scientific thinking? Cognitive Development, 23(4), 435–451. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. C., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). The relationships between epistemic beliefs in biology and approaches to learning biology among biology-major university students in Taiwan. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(6), 796–807. doi:10.1007/s10956-012-9367-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Ariasi, N., & Boldrin, A. (2011). Epistemic beliefs in action: Spontaneous reflections about knowledge and knowing during online information searching and their influence on learning. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 137–151. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Ariasi, N. (2010). Epistemic metacognition in context: Evaluating and learning online information. Metacognition and Learning, 5(1), 67–90. doi:10.1007/s11409-009-9048-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L., & Scirica, F. (2006). Prediction of students' argumentation skills about controversial topics by epistemological understanding. Learning and Instruction, 16(5), 492–509. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, J., Veenman, M. V. J., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2006). Metacognitive activities in text studying and problem solving: Development of a taxonomy. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(3), 209–238. doi:10.1080/13803610500479991
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. M. (2013). Knowing when to doubt: Developing a critical stance when learning from others. Developmental Psychology, 49(3), 404–418. doi:10.1037/a0029500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R. (2007). The role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 42(3), 173–190. doi:10.1080/00461520701416306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R. (2008). Epistemic profiles and self-regulated learning: Examining relations in the context of mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 177–208. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R., Bendixen, L. D., & Haerle, F. (2006). Domain-generality and domain-specificity in personal epistemology research: Philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework. Educational Psychology Review, 18(1), 3–54. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9003-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R., & Duffy, M. C. (2013). Epistemic climate and epistemic change: Instruction designed to change students' beliefs and learning strategies and improve achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 213–225. doi:10.1037/a0029690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R., & Franco, G. M. (2010). Epistemic profiles and metacognition: Support for the consistency hypothesis. Metacognition and Learning, 5(1), 27–45. doi:10.1007/s11409-009-9041-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R., Franco, G. M., & Gierus, B. (2011). Examining epistemic beliefs across conceptual and procedural knowledge in statistics. International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(4), 507–519.
   Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R., Kendeou, P., & Franco, G. M. (2011). Consistent results with the consistency hypothesis? The effects of epistemic beliefs on metacognitive processing. Metacognition and Learning, 6(1), 45–63. doi:10.1007/s11409-010-9066-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R., Pekrun, R., Sinatra, G. M., Azevedo, R., Trevors, G., Meier, E., & Heddy, B. C. (2015). The curious case of climate change: Testing a theoretical model of epistemic beliefs, epistemic emotions, and complex learning. Learning and Instruction, 39, 168–183. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R., Trevors, G., Duffy, M., Ranellucci, J., & Foy, M. J. (2016). Testing the TIDE: Examining the nature of students’ epistemic beliefs using a multiple methods approach. Journal of Experimental Education, 84(2), 264–288. doi:10.1080/00220973.2015.1048843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puustinen, M., & Pulkkinen, L. (2001). Models of self-regulated learning: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 269–286. doi:10.1080/00313830120074206
   Google Scholar
• Roderer, T., & Roebers, C. M. (2014). Can you see me thinking (about my answers)? Using eye-tracking to illuminate developmental differences in monitoring and control skills and their relation to performance. Metacognition and Learning, 9(1), 1–23. doi:10.1007/s11409-013-9109-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2005). The quality of students' use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 23–55. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schommer, M. (1994). Synthesizing epistemological belief research: Tentative understandings and provocative confusions. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 293–319. doi:10.1007/BF02213418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–445. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., Kienhues, D., & Hofer, B. K. (2014). Addressing challenges to public understanding of science: Epistemic cognition, motivated reasoning, and conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 123–138. doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.916216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, E., Pieschl, S., & Bromme, R. (2006). Task complexity, epistemological beliefs and metacognitive calibration: An exploratory study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 319–338. doi:10.2190/1266-0413-387K-7J51
   Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H. I., & Bråten, I. (2010). The role of personal epistemology in the self-regulation of internet-based learning. Metacognition and Learning, 5(1), 91–111. doi:10.1007/s11409-009-9043-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Britt, M. A. (2011). Do students’ beliefs about knowledge and knowing predict their judgement of texts’ trustworthiness? Educational Psychology, 31(2), 177–206. doi:10.1080/01443410.2010.538039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Stel, M., & Veenman, M. V. (2010). Development of metacognitive skillfulness: A longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 220–224. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Stel, M., & Veenman, M. V. (2014). Metacognitive skills and intellectual ability of young adolescents: A longitudinal study from a developmental perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(1), 117–137. doi:10.1007/s10212-013-0190-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V. J. (2011). Alternative assessment of strategy use with self-report instruments: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 6(2), 205–211. doi:10.1007/s11409-011-9080-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V., Wilhelm, P., & Beishuizen, J. J. (2004). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills from a developmental perspective. Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 89–109. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2003.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, D. N. (1989). Dialogue theory for critical thinking. Argumentation, 3, 169–184. doi:10.1007/BF00128147
   Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., Jamieson-Noel, D., & Muis, K. (2002). Methodological issues and advances in researching tactics, strategies, and self-regulated learning. Advances in motivation and achievement: New directions in measures and methods, 12, 121–155.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., Zheng, X., Zhang, L., Sha, W., Deák, G., & Li, H. (2010). Older children's misunderstanding of uncertain belief after passing the false belief test. Cognitive Development, 25(2), 158–165. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. doi:10.1086/651257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar