References
- Abric, J. C. (1994). Les représentations sociales: Aspects théoriques. In J. C. Abric (Ed.), Pratiques sociales et reprèsentations. Paris: Presses Universitaire de France.
- Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. In B. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour (Vol 7, pp. 263–295). Greenwich: JAI Press.
- Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (1999). Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25(3), 293–315.
- Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (2008). Social representations theory: A progressive research programme for social psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(4), 335–353.
- Ben-Asher, S. (2003). Hegemonic, emancipated and polemical social representations: Parental dialogue regarding Israeli marine soldiers training in polluted water. Papers on Social Representations, 12(6), 1–6.
- Ben-Asher, S. (2015). Development of teachers’ identity representations in the process of academic accreditation for colleges. Dapim: Journal for Studies and Research in Education, 61, 11–31.
- Ben-Asher, S., Wagner, W., & Orr, E. (2006). Thinking groups: A rhetorical enactment of collective identity in three Israeli kibbutzim. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9(2), 112–122.
- Ben-Asher, S., & Wolff, R. (2014). Privacy as a social mechanism for maintaining inconsistency between identities. Papers on Social Representations, 23, 11.1–11.22.
- Bernard, H. R. (2017). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Breakwell, G. M. (1993). Social representations and social identity. Papers on Social Representations, 2, 198–217.
- Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). How teacher education matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 166–173.
- Duveen, G. (2001). Representations, identity, resistance. In K. Deaux, & G. Philogene (Eds.), Representations of the social (pp. 257–270). Oxford: Blackwell.
- Friling, D. (2012). Complex reality: The Israeli case. Papers on social representations, 21, 2.1–2.24
- Goffman, E. (1969). The insanity of place. Psychiatry, 32(4), 357–388.
- Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age. Teachers College Press.
- Hoffman, A., & Kfir, D. (2012). Who shapes teacher training? In R. Klavir, & L. Kozminsky (Eds.), The construction of the professional identity of teachers and teacher educators in a changing reality (pp. 13–25). Tel Aviv: MOFET Institute, Intercollegiate Research Authority [Hebrew].
- Jaspal, R., Nerlich, B., & Cinnirella, M. (2014). Human responses to climate change: Social representation, identity and socio-psychological action. Environmental Communication, 8(1), 110–130.
- Jodelet, D., & Moscovici, S. (1989). Folies et représentations sociales. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
- Jovchelovitch, S. (2007). Knowledge in context: Representations, community and culture. London: Routledge.
- Jovchelovitch, S. (2008). The rehabilitation of common sense: Social representations, science and cognitive polyphasia. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(4), 431–448.
- Klavir, R., & Kozminsky, L. (2012). Who are teacher educators? Teachers? Researchers? Academic faculty members? In R. Klavir, & L. Kozminsky (Eds.), The construction of the professional identity of teachers and teacher educators in a changing reality (pp. 587–613). Tel Aviv: MOFET Institute, Intercollegiate Research Authority [Hebrew].
- Koster, B., Dengerink, D., Korthagen, F., & Lunenberg, M. (2008). Teacher educators working on their own professional development: Goals, activities and outcomes of a project for the professional development of teacher educators. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14(5–6), 567–587.
- Lamote, C., & Engels, N. (2010). The development of student teachers’ professional identity. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(1), 3–18.
- Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985a). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 1986(30), 73–84.
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2007). Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New directions for evaluation. New directions for evaluation, 114, 15–25.
- Loughran, J. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education. London: Falmer.
- Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Moscovici, S. (1963). Attitudes and opinions. Annual Review of Psychology, 14, 231–260.
- Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representation. In R. M. Farr, & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3–69). Cambridge/Paris: University Press and Editions de la Maison des Sciences de I’Homme.
- Moscovici, S. (1985). Social influence and conformity. In G. Lindsey, & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 347–412). New York: Random House.
- Moscovici, S. (2001). Social representations: Essays in social psychology. New York: NYU Press.
- Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(3), 211–250.
- Murray, J., Czerniawski, G., & Barber, P. (2011). Teacher educators’ identities and work in England at the beginning of the second decade of the twenty-first century. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(3), 261–277. doi: 10.1080/02607476.2011.588014
- Murray, J., Swennen, A., & Shagrir, L. (2008). The work and identities of teacher educators. In A. Swennen, & M. van der Klink (Eds.), Becoming a teacher educator: Theory and practice for teacher educators. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Poole, M. S., Van de Ven, A. H., Dooley, K., & Holmes, M. E. (2000). Organizational change and innovation processes: Theory and methods for research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Pratt, M. G. (1998). To be or not to be: Central questions in organizational identification. In D. A. Whetten, & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversation (pp.171–207). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Provencher, C. (2011). Towards a better understanding of cognitive polyphasia. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(4), 377–395.
- Schein, E. (2003). Kurt Levin’s change theory in the field and in the classroom: Notes toward a model of managed learning. Retrieved from http://www.solonline.org/res/wp/10006.html
- Schwandt, T. A. (2007). Judging interpretations. In T. A. Schwandt, Y. S. Lincoln, & E. G. Guba (Eds.), Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New directions for evaluation (pp. 11–14). New York: Wiley.
- Smith, E. R., & Mackie, D. M. (1995). Social psychology. New York: Worth Publishers.
- Swennen, A., Shagrir, L., & Cooper, M. (2009). Becoming a teacher educator: Voices of beginning teacher educators. In Becoming a teacher educator (pp. 91–102). Dordrecht:Springer.
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In S. Worchel, & L. W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson Hall.
- Valsiner, J., Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., & Gaskell, G. (2015). Social representations: A revolutionary paradigm. In G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of social representations (pp. 3–11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Van Gennep, A. (1960). The rites of passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Wagner, W. (1998). Social representations and beyond: Brute facts, symbolic coping and domesticated worlds. Culture & Psychology, 4(3), 297–329.
- Wagner, W., & Hayes, N. (2005). Everyday discourse and common sense: The theory of social representations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Whetten, D. A. (2006). Albert and Whetten revisited: Strengthening the concept of organizational identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(3), 219–234.