Attitudinal Survey Characteristics Impacting Participant Responses

References

• Bandalos, D. L. (2014). Relative performance of categorical diagonally weighted least squares and robust maximum likelihood estimation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(1), 102–116. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.859510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M., Cascio, W. F., & O'Connor, E. J. (1974). Magnitude estimations of expressions of frequency and amount. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(3), 313–320. doi: 10.1037/h0036653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battle, A., & Wigfield, A. (2003). College women’s value orientations toward family, career, and graduate school. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62(1), 56–75. doi: 10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00037-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgers, N., & Hox, J. J. (2000, October 3-6). Reliability of responses in questionnaire research with children. Paper presented at the social science methodology in the New Millennium. Fifth international conference on logic and methodology, Cologne, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Borgers, N., Hox, J., & Sikkel, D. (2003). Response quality in survey research with children and adolescents: The effect of labeled response options and vague quantifiers. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15(1), 83–94. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/15.1.83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradburn, N., & Miles, C. (1979). Vague quantifiers. Public Opinion Quarterly, 43(1), 92–101. doi: 10.1086/268494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnkrant, R. E., & Howard, D. J. (1984). Effects of the use of introductory rhetorical questions versus statements on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1218–1230. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.47.6.1218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickman, S. (1990). Functional and dysfunctional impulsivity: Personality and cognitive correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 95–102. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.1.95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embretson, S. E. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 179–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embretson, S. E. (1998). A cognitive design system approach to generating valid tests: Application to abstract reasoning. Psychological Methods, 3(3), 380–396. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.3.380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French-Lazovik, G., & Gibson, C. L. (1984). Effects of verbally labeled anchor points on the distributional parameters of rating measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8(1), 49–57. doi: 10.1177/014662168400800106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, J. C., & Shuminsky, T. R. (1990). Self-awareness mediates the relationship between serial position and item reliability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1301–1307. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. doi: 10.1037//1082-989X.3.4.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, E., & Yoon, M. (2017). Two-step approach to partial factorial invariance: Selecting a reference variable and identifying the source of noninvariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 24(1), 65–79. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2016.1251845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosovich, J. J., Hulleman, C. S., Barron, K. E., & Getty, S. (2014). A practical measure of student motivation: Establishing validity evidence for the expectancy-value-cost scale in middle school. Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(5-6), 790–816. doi: 10.1177/0272431614556890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A. (1991). Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(3), 213–236. doi: 10.1002/acp.2350050305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., & Berent, M. K. (1993). Comparisons of party identification and policy preferences: The impact of survey questions format. American Journal of Political Sciences, 37(3), 941–964. doi: 10.2307/2111580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindwall, M., Barkoukis, V., Grano, C., Lucidi, F., Raudsepp, L., Liukkonen, J., & Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2012). Method effects: The problem with negatively versus positively keyed items. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(2), 196–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1996). Positive and negative global self-esteem: A substantively meaningful distinction or artifactor?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 810–819. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.70.4.810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2014). Mplus v.7.2. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Rennier, G. A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1987). Assertion versus interrogation format in opinion surveys: Questions enhance thoughtful responding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51(4), 481–494. doi: 10.1086/269053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl, N. F. (1981). Scale considerations in using vague quantifiers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 49(4), 235–240. doi: 10.1080/00220973.1981.11011790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, S. R. (2011). Do college student surveys have any validity?. The Review of Higher Education, 35(1), 45–76. doi: 10.1353/rhe.2011.0034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. E., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354–373. doi: 10.1037/a0029315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, N. C. (1991). Hardly ever or constantly? Group comparisons using vague quantifier. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55(3), 395–423. doi: 10.1086/269270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1996). Questions and answers in attitude surveys. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, R. H. (1944). The specific meanings of certain terms indicating differing degrees of frequency. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 30(3), 328–330. doi: 10.1080/00335634409381009
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1997). Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 342–357. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudman, S., Bradburn, N. M., & Schwartz, N. (1996). Thinking about answers: The application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tomás, J. M., Oliver, A., Galiana, L., Sancho, P., & Marisol, L. (2013). Explaining method effects associated with negatively worded items in trait and state global and domain-specific self-esteem scales. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(2), 299–313. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2013.769394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., & Rasinski, K. A. (1988). Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 299–314. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.103.3.299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., Rasinski, K. A., & Bradburn, N. (1991). Measuring happiness in surveys: A test of the subtraction hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55(2), 255–266. doi: 10.1086/269256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uskul, A. K., Oyserman, D., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Cultural emphasis on honor, modesty, or self-enhancement: Implications for the survey response process. In M. Braun, B. Edwards, J. Harkness, T. Johnson, L. Lyberg, P. Mohler, B.E. Pennell, & T.W. Smith. (Eds.) Survey methods in multinational, multiregional and multicultural context. NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. doi: 10.1177/109442810031002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wänke, M. (2002). Conversational norms and interpretation of vague quantifiers. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16(3), 301–307. doi: 10.1002/acp.787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng, L.-J. (2004). Impact of the number of response categories and anchor labels on coefficient alpha and test-retest reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(6), 956–972. doi: 10.1177/0013164404268674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildt, A. R., & Mazis, M. B. (1978). Determinants of scale response: Label versus position. Journal of Marketing Research, 15(2), 261–267. doi: 10.2307/3151256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. B., Gaskell, G. D., & O'Muircheartaigh, C. A. (1994). How much is “Quite a bit”? Mapping between numerical values and vague quantifiers. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8(5), 479–496. doi: 10.1002/acp.2350080506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, M., & Millsap, R. E. (2007). Detecting violations of factorial invariance using data-based specification searches: A Monte Carlo study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 433–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillman, D. (1972). Rhetorical elicitation of agreement in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(2), 150–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar