Calibration to Task Complexity: The Role of Epistemic Cognition

References

• Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2014). Reconsidering personal epistemology as metacognition: A multifaceted approach to the analysis of epistemic thinking. Educational Psychologist, 49(1), 13–35. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2013.863265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., Strømsø, H. I., & Rouet, J. F. (2011). The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of multiple expository texts: Toward an integrated model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 48–70. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2011.538647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2009). Effects of task instruction and personal epistemology on the understanding of multiple texts about climate change. Discourse Processes, 47(1), 1–31. doi: 10.1080/01638530902959646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromme, R., Pieschl, S., & Stahl, E. (2010). Epistemological beliefs are standards for adaptive learning: A functional theory about epistemological beliefs and metacognition. Metacognition and Learning, 5(1), 7–26. doi: 10.1007/s11409-009-9053-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromme, R., Pieschl, S. & Stahl, E. (2014). Epistemological beliefs and students’ adaptive perception of task complexity. In S. Krolak-Schwerdt, S. Glock & M. Böhmer (Eds.), The future of educational research (Vol. 3, pp. 123–151). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Buehl, M. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2005). Motivation and performance differences in students’ domain-specific epistemological belief profiles. American Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 697–726. doi: 10.3102/00028312042004697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, C., & Daneman, M. (2007). Compensating for a limited working memory capacity during reading: Evidence from eye movements. Reading Psychology, 28(2), 163–186. doi: 10.1080/02702710601186407
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• DeBacker, T. K., Crowson, H. M., Beesley, A. D., Thoma, S. J., & Hestevold, N. L. (2008). The challenge of measuring epistemic beliefs: An analysis of three self-report instruments. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76(3), 281–312. doi: 10.3200/JEXE.76.3.281-314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dole, J. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33(2-3), 109–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 1–11. doi: 10.3758/BF03203630
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., & Erdfelder, E. (1992). GPOWER: A priori, post-hoc, and compromise power analyses for MS-DOS. Bonn, Germany: Bonn University, Department of Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, L. E., Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2012). Epistemic cognition when students read multiple documents containing conflicting scientific evidence: A think-aloud study. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 103–120. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Flore, P. C., & Wicherts, J. M. (2015). Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped domains? A meta-analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 53(1), 25–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2014.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, G. M., Muis, K. R., Kendeou, P., Ranellucci, J., Sampasivam, L., & Wang, X. (2012). Examining the influences of epistemic beliefs and knowledge representations on cognitive processing and conceptual change when learning physics. Learning and Instruction, 22(1), 62–77. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, C., Aronson, J., & Harder, J. A. (2008). Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and women’s achievement in high-level math courses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(1), 17–28. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2007.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. A. (2009). A macro-level analysis of SRL processes and their relations to the acquisition of a sophisticated mental model of a complex system. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 18–29. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., Azevedo, R. A., & Torney-Purta, J. (2008). Modeling epistemic and ontological cognition: Philosophical perspectives and methodological directions. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 142–160. doi: 10.1080/00461520802178458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., Cartiff, B. M., & Duke, R. F. (2018). A meta-analytic review of the relationship between epistemic cognition and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(8), 1084–1111. doi: 10.1037/edu0000263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., Muis, K. R., & Pieschl, S. (2010). The role of epistemic beliefs in students’ self-regulated learning with computer-based learning environments: Conceptual and methodological issues. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 245–257. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2010.515932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., Sandoval, W. A., & Bråten, I. (Eds.) (2016). International handbook of epistemic cognition. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., Yu, S. B., & Copeland, D. Z. (2014). Measuring critical components of digital literacy and their relationships with learning. Computers and Education, 76, 55–69. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169–190). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(4), 378–405. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 43–55. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3901_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K. (2016). Epistemic cognition as a psychological construct: Advancements and challenges. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), International handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 19–37). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140. doi: 10.2307/1170620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K., & Sinatra, G. M. (2010). Epistemology, metacognition, and self-regulation: Musings on an emerging field. Metacognition and Learning, 5(1), 113–120. doi: 10.1007/s11409-009-9051-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, M. J., & Jehng, J.-C. (1999). Epistemological beliefs instrument: Scales and items. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Muis, K. R., & Fulton, S. (2011). Reader and text factors in reading comprehension processes. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(4), 365–383. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01436.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15(3), 309–328. doi: 10.1016/S0885-2014(00)00030-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. (2010). Beliefs about knowledge and revision of knowledge: On the importance of epistemic beliefs for intentional conceptual change in elementary and middle school students. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 258–291). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Ariasi, N., & Boldrin, A. (2011). Epistemic beliefs in action: Spontaneous reflections about knowledge and knowing during online information searching and their influence on learning. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 137–151. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Gava, M., & Boldrin, A. (2008). On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 291–309. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 226–232. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R. (2004). Personal epistemology and mathematics: A critical review and synthesis of research. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 317–377. doi: 10.3102/00346543074003317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R. (2007). The role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 42(3), 173–190. doi: 10.1080/00461520701416306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R., Bendixen, L. D., & Haerle, F. C. (2006). Domain-generality and domain-specificity in personal epistemology research: Philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework. Educational Psychology Review, 18(1), 3–54. doi: 10.1007/s10648-006-9003-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R., Chevrier, M., & Singh, C. A. (2018). The role of epistemic emotions in personal epistemology and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 53, 165–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R., Duffy, M. C., Trevors, G., Ranellucci, J., & Foy, M. (2014). What were they thinking? Using cognitive interviewing to examine the validity of self-reported epistemic beliefs. International Education Research, 2, 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R., Pekrun, R., Sinatra, G. M., Azevedo, R., Trevors, G., Meier, E., & Heddy, B. C. (2015). The curious case of climate change: Testing a theoretical model of epistemic beliefs, epistemic emotions, and complex learning. Learning and Instruction, 39, 168–183. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R., & Singh, C. A. (2018). The three facets of epistemic thinking in self-regulated learning. In D. Schunk & J. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulated of learning and performance (pp. 434–456). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people’s judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The “delayed-JOL effect”. Psychological Science, 2(4), 267–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00147.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieschl, S. (2009). Metacognitive calibration—An extended conceptualization and potential applications. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 3–31. doi: 10.1007/s11409-008-9030-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieschl, S., Stahl, E., & Bromme, R. (2008). Epistemological beliefs and self-regulated learning with hypertext. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 17–37. doi: 10.1007/s11409-007-9008-7
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., García, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Puustinen, M., & Pulkkinen, L. (2001). Models of self-regulated learning: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 269–286. doi: 10.1080/00313830120074206
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, J. S. (1990). Statistical power of psychological research: What have we gained in 20 years? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58(5), 646–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer, J. M., Carlo, M. S., Dufresne, R., & Mestre, J. (1996). The assessment of levels of domain expertise while reading. Cognition and Instruction, 14(3), 373–408. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci1403_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498–504. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G. (2010). Measuring self-regulation in computer-based learning environments. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 258–266. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2010.515936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., Bendixen, L. D., & Dunkle, M. E. (2002). Development and validation of the Epistemic Belief Inventory (EBI). In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 103–118). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Scouller, K. M. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35(4), 453–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheskin, D. J. (2003). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. Cleveland, OH: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, E., & Bromme, R. (2007). CAEB. An instrument to measure connotative aspects of epistemological beliefs. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 773–785. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, E., Pieschl, S., & Bromme, R. (2006). Task complexity, epistemological beliefs and metacognitive calibration: An exploratory study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 319–338. doi: 10.2190/1266-0413-387K-7J51
   Google Scholar
• Stallmann, F. (2007). The influence of epistemological beliefs and academic self-concept on metacognitive calibration in German 12th graders (Unpublished diploma thesis). University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Stathopoulou, C., & Vosniadou, S. (2007). Exploring the relationship between physics-related epistemological beliefs and physics understanding. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 255–281. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Britt, M. A. (2010). Reading multiple texts about climate change: The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 20(3), 192–204. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M. (2016). Thoughts on knowledge about thinking about knowledge. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), International handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 479–491). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2007). Predicting global and topic-specific certainty beliefs: Domain-specificity and the role of the academic environment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 907–934. doi: 10.1348/000709906X169012
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winne, P. H. (2018). Theorizing and researching levels of processing in self‐regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 9–20. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., Jamieson-Noel, D. L., & Muis, K. R. (2002). Methodological issues and advances in researching tactics, strategies, and self-regulated learning. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 12, pp. 121–158). Greewhich, CT: JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., & Marx, R. W. (1989). A cognitive-processing analysis of motivation within classroom tasks. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 223–257). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar