References
- Barenberg, J., & Dutke, S. (2013). Metacognitive monitoring in university classes: Anticipating a graded vs. a pass-fail test affects monitoring accuracy. Metacognition and Learning, 8(2), 121–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9098-3
- Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417–444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823
- Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980
- Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065003245
- Chiang, E. S., Therriault, D. J., & Franks, B. A. (2010). Individual differences in relative metacomprehension accuracy: Variation within and across task manipulations. Metacognition and Learning, 5(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-009-9052-6
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
- Dinsmore, D. L., & Parkinson, M. M. (2013). What are confidence judgments made of? Students’ explanations for their confidence ratings and what that means for calibration. Learning and Instruction, 24, 4–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.06.001
- Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2012). Overconfidence produces underachievement: inaccurate self-evaluations undermine students’ learning and retention. Learning and Instruction, 22(4), 271–280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.003
- Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2015). Do students use testing and feedback while learning? A focus on key concept definitions and learning to criterion. Learning and Instruction, 39, 32–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.05.003
- Eason, S. H., Goldberg, L. F., Young, K. M., Geist, M. C., & Cutting, L. E. (2012). Reader–text interactions: How differential text and question types influence cognitive skills needed for reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 515–528. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027182
- Entin, E. B., & Klare, G. R. (1978). Some inter-relationships of readability, cloze and multiple choice scores on a reading comprehension test. Journal of Reading Behavior, 10(4), 417–436.
- Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203630
- Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 32(3), 221–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057532
- Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitivedevelopmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
- Follmer, D. J. (2018). Executive function and reading comprehension: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 53(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1309295
- Follmer, D. J., & Sperling, R. A. (2018). Interactions between reader and text: Contributions of cognitive processes, strategy use, and text cohesion to comprehension of expository science text. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 177–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.08.005
- Follmer, D. J., & Sperling, R. A. (2019). A latent variable analysis of the contribution of executive function to adult readers’ comprehension of science text: The roles of vocabulary ability and level of comprehension. Reading and Writing, 32(2), 377–403. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9872-3
- Follmer, D. J., Sperling, R. A., & Suen, H. K. (2017). The role of MTurk in educational research: Advantages, issues, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 46(6), 329–334. 13189X17725519 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00
- Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2011). Coh-metrix: Providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics. Educational Researcher, 40(5), 223–234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11413260
- Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers: A Journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc, 36(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195564
- Gutierrez, A. P., Schraw, G., Kuch, F., & Richmond, A. S. (2016). A two-process model of metacognitive monitoring: Evidence for general accuracy and error factors. Learning and Instruction, 44, 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.006
- Hartwig, M. K., & Dunlosky, J. (2017). Category learning judgments in the classroom: Can students judge how well they know course topics? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 80–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.12.002
- Homan, S., Hewitt, M., & Linder, J. (1994). The development and validation of a formula for measuring single-sentence test item readability. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31(4), 349–358. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1994.tb00452.x
- Huff, J. D., & Nietfeld, J. L. (2009). Using strategy instruction and confidence judgments to improve metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning, 4(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-009-9042-8
- Kessel, R., Gecht, J., Forkmann, T., Drueke, B., Gauggel, S., & Mainz, V. (2014). Metacognitive monitoring of attention performance and its influencing factors. Psychological Research, 78(4), 597–607. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0511-y
- Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100(4), 609–639. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.100.4.609
- Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(4), 349–370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.126.4.349
- Kulhavy, R. W., Yekovich, F. R., & Dyer, J. W. (1976). Feedback and response confidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(5), 522–528. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.68.5.522
- Lee, H. W., Lim, K. Y., & Grabowski, B. L. (2010). Improving self-regulation, learning strategy use, and achievement with metacognitive feedback. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(6), 629–648. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9153-6
- Leroy, G., & Kauchak, D. J. (2014). The effect of word familiarity on actual and perceived text difficulty. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21(e1), e169–e172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002172
- List, A., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Analyzing and integrating models of multiple tex comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 143–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1328309
- Maki, R. H., Foley, J. M., Kajer, W. K., Thompson, R. C., & Willert, M. G. (1990). Increased processing enhances calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 609–616. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.609
- McCarthy, P. M., Lewis, G. A., Dufty, D. F., & McNamara, D. S. (2006, May). Analyzing writing styles with Coh-Metrix. In FLAIRS Conference (pp. 764–769).
- Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In GH Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (vol. 26, pp. 125–173). Academic.
- Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom. The Journal of Experimental Educational, 74(1), 7–28.
- Nietfeld, J. L., & Schraw, G. (2002). The effect of knowledge and strategy training on monitoring accuracy. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(3), 131–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596583
- O’Sullivan, O. P. (2015). The neural basis of always looking on the bright side. Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences, 8(1), 11–15.
- Ozuru, Y., Kurby, C. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2012). The effect of metacomprehension judgment task on comprehension monitoring and metacognitive accuracy. Metacognition and Learning, 7(2), 113–131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-012-9087-y
- Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the turk: Understanding mechanical turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 184–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414531598
- Pilegard, C., & Mayer, R. E. (2015). Within-subject and between-subject conceptions of metacomprehension accuracy. Learning and Individual Differences, 41, 54–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.07.003
- Pilotti, M., Chodorow, M., & Petrov, R. (2009). The usefulness of retrieval practice and review-only practice for answering conceptually related test questions. The Journal of General Psychology, 136(2), 179–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3200/GENP.136.2.179-204
- Rawson, K., Dunlosky, J., & McDonald, S. (2002). Influences of metamemory on performance predictions for text. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 55(2), 505–524. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980143000352
- Reid, A. J., Morrison, G. R., & Bol, L. (2017). Knowing what you know: Improving metacomprehension and calibration accuracy in digital text. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9454-5
- Reynolds, R. E. (2000). Attentional resource emancipation: Toward understanding the interaction of word identification and comprehension processes in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(3), 169–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0403_1
- Schraw, G. (1997). Situational interest in literary text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(4), 436–456. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0944
- Schraw, G. (2009). A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9031-3
- Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475.
- Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–371.
- Schraw, G., Bruning, R., & Svoboda, C. (1995). Sources of situational interest. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969509547866
- Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 257–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_4
- Shaughnessy, J. J. (1979). Confidence-judgment accuracy as a predictor of test performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 13(4), 505–514. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(79)90012-6
- Sperling, R. A., & Dornisch, M. M. (2004, July). Facilitating higher-order processing while learning from text: Effective and less effective strategy prompts [Paper presentation]. Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association.
- Stine-Morrow, E. A., Miller, L. M. S., & Hertzog, C. (2006). Aging and self-regulated language processing. Psychological Bulletin, 132(4), 582–606. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.4.582
- Thiede, K. W., Griffin, T. D., Wiley, J., & Redford, J. S. (2009). Metacognitive monitoring during and after reading. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition and self-regulated learning. Routledge.
- Vasilyeva, E., Pechenizkiy, M., & De Bra, P. (2008). Tailoring of feedback in web-based learning: The role of response certitude in the assessment. In Woolf B.P., Aïmeur E., Nkambou R., & Lajoie S. (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems. ITS 2008. Lecture notes in computer science (vol. 5091). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_104
- Vössing, J., & Stamov-Roßnagel, C. (2016). Boosting metacomprehension accuracy in computer-supported learning: The role of judgment task and judgment scope. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 73–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.066
- Walkington, C., Clinton, V., & Shivraj, P. (2018). How readability factors are differentially associated with performance for students of different backgrounds when solving mathematics word problems. American Educational Research Journal, 55(2), 362–414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217737028
- Weinstein, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 806–820. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806
- Wiley, J., Griffin, T. D., Jaeger, A. J., Jarosz, A. F., Cushen, P. J., & Thiede, K. W. (2016). Improving metacomprehension accuracy in an undergraduate course context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 22(4), 393–405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000096
- Winne, P. H. (1996). A metacognitive view of individual differences in self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8(4), 327–353. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90022-9
- Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329.
- Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self regulation (pp. 13–39). New York: Academic Press.