References
- Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Allen, R. M., & Casbergue, R. M. (1997). Evolution of novice through expert teachers’ recall: Implications for effective reflection on practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(7), 741–755. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00018-8
- Amato-Zech, N. A., Hoff, K. E., & Doepke, K. J. (2006). Increasing on-task behavior in the classroom: Extensions of self-monitoring strategies. Psychology in the Schools, 43(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20137
- Ames, C. (1992). Achievement goals and classroom motivational climate. In J. Meece & D. Schunk (Eds.), Students’ perceptions in the classroom (pp. 327–348). Erlbaum.
- Artino, A. R., Jr., Cleary, T. J., Dong, T., Hemmer, P. A., & Durning, S. J. (2014). Exploring clinical reasoning in novices: A self‐regulated learning microanalytic assessment approach. Medical Education, 48(3), 280–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12303
- Aud, S., Wilkinson-Flicker, S., Kristapovich, P., Rathbun, A., Wang, X., & Zhang, J. (2013). The condition of education 2013 (NCES 2013-037). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
- Auerbach, A. J., Higgings, M., Brickman, P., & Andrews, T. C. (2018). Teacher knowledge for active-learning instruction: Expert-novice comparison reveals differences. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 17(12), 1–14.
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice- Hall.
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
- Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93(1), 26–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20286
- Butler, D. L., Lauscher, H. N., Jarvis-Selinger, S., & Beckingham, B. (2004). Collaboration and self-regulation in teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(5), 435–455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.04.003
- Cleary, T. J. (2011). Shifting towards self-regulation microanalytic assessment: Historical overview, essential features, and implications for research and practice. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 329–345). Routledge.
- Cleary, T. J., & Callan, G. L. (2014). Student self-regulated learning in an urban high school: Predictive validity and relations between teacher ratings and student self-reports. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32(4), 295–305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282913507653
- Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Self-regulation differences during athletic practice by experts, non-experts, and novices. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13(2), 185–206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/104132001753149883
- Cleary, T. J., Peters-Burton, E., Gergel, C., & Willet, K. (2018). Applications of cyclical self-regulated learning principles to life science. In M. DiBenedetto (Ed.) Connecting self-regulated learning and performance with instruction across high school content areas. (pp. 127–162). Dorchet: Springer.
- Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18(2), 88–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528309529266
- Crippen, K. J. (2012). Argument as professional development: Impacting teacher knowledge and beliefs about science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(8), 847–866. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9282-3
- DiBenedetto, M. K., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2010). Differences in self-regulatory processes among students studying science: A microanalytic investigation. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 5(1), 2–24.
- DiBenedetto, M. K., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). Construct and predictive validity of microanalytic measures of students’ self-regulation of science learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 30–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.04.004
- Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Open University Press.
- Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. F. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
- Follmer, J., & Sperling, R. A. (2019). Examining the role of self-regulated learning Microanalysis in the assessment of learners’ regulation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 87(2), 269–287. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1409184
- Frieberg, H. J., & Waxman, H. C. (1990). Reflection and the acquisition of technical teaching skills. In Clift, R. T., Houston, W. R. & Pugac, M. C. (Eds.), Encouraging reflective practice in education (pp. 119–137). Teachers College, Columbia University.
- Ghatala, E. S. (1986). Strategy-monitoring training enables young learners to select effective strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2101&2_3
- Gonzalez-Howard, M., & McNeill, K. L. (2019). Teachers’ framing of argumentation goals: Working together to develop individual versus communal understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(6), 821–824. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21530
- Graham, S., & Williams, C. (2009). An attributional approach to children’s motivation in school. In K. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation in school (pp. 11–34). Taylor Francis.
- Grooms, J., Sampson, V., & Enderle, P. (2018). How concept familiarity and experience with scientific argumentation are related to the way groups participate in an episode of argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(9), 1264–1286. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21451
- Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015005005
- Hashweh, M. Z. (2005). Teacher pedagogical constructions: A reconfiguration of pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers and Teaching, 11(3), 273–292.
- Henderson, J. B., McNeill, K. L., Gonzalez-Howard, M., Close, K., & Evans, M. (2018). Key challenges and future directions for educational research on scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21412
- Huang, R., & Li, Y. (2012). What matters most: A comparison of expert and novice teachers’ noticing of mathematics classroom events. School Science and Mathematics, 112(7), 420– 432. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2012.00161.x
- Jin, X., Li, T., Meirink, J., van der Want, A., & Admiraal, W. (2019). Learning from novice–expert interaction in teachers’ continuing professional development. Professional Development in Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1651752
- Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903142285
- Kisa, M. T., & Stein, M. K. (2015). Learning to see teaching in new ways: A foundation for maintaining cognitive demand. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 105–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214549452
- Kitsantas, A., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Comparing self-regulatory processes among novice, non-expert, and expert volleyball players: A microanalytic Study. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200252907761
- Knight, P. (2002). A systematic approach to professional development: Learning as practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(3), 229–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00066-X
- Knight-Bardsley, A., & McNeill, K. L. (2016). Teachers’ pedagogical design capacity for scientific argumentation. Science Education, 100(4), 645–672. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21222
- Krull, E., Oras, K., & Sisask, S. (2007). Differences in teachers’ comments on classroom events as indicators of their professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(7), 1038–1050. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.02.001
- Lee, E., Brown, M. N., Luft, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). Assessing beginning secondary science teachers’ PCK: Pilot year results. School Science and Mathematics, 107(2), 52–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2007.tb17768.x
- Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. The American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
- MacArthur, C., & Philippakos, Z. A. (2013). Self-regulated strategy instruction in developmental writing: A design research project. Community College Review, 41(2), 176–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552113484580
- Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage.
- Meyer, H. (2004). Novice and expert teachers’ conceptions of learners’ prior knowledge. Science Education, 88(6), 970–983. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20006
- Nelson, R. O., & Hayes, S. C. (1981). Theoretical explanations for reactivity in self-monitoring. Behavior Modification, 5(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/014544558151001
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035
- Osborne, J. F., Henderson, J. B., MacPherson, A., Szu, E., Wild, A., & Yao, S. Y. (2016). The development and validation of a learning progression for argumentation in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(6), 821–846. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21316
- Pape, S. J., Bell, C. V., & Yetkin, I. E. (2003). Developing mathematical thinking and self-regulated learning: A teaching experiment in a seventh-grade mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53(3), 179–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026062121857
- Paris, S. G., Cross, D. R., & Lipson, M. Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children's reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(6), 1239–1252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.6.1239
- Perry, N. E., & Winne, P. H. (2006). Learning from learning kits: gStudy traces of students' self-regulated engagements with computerized content. Educational Psychology Review, 18(3), 211–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9014-3
- Peters, E. E. & Kitsantas, A. (2010). The effect of nature of science metacognitive prompts on science students’ content and nature of science knowledge, metacognition, and self-regulatory efficacy. School Science and Mathematics, 110, 382–396.
- Peters, E.E. (2012). Developing content knowledge in students through explicit teaching of the nature of science: Influences of goal setting and self-monitoring. Science & Education, 21(6), 881–898.
- Peters-Burton E. E. (2013). Student work products as a teaching tool for nature of science pedagogical knowledge: A professional development project with in-service secondary science teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 156–166.
- Peters-Burton, E. E., Cleary, T. J., & Forman, S. (2015). Professional development contexts that promote self-regulated learning in trainees. In T. J. Cleary (Ed.) Self-regulated learning interventions with at-risk populations: Academic, mental health, and contextual considerations (pp. 205–227). New York: APA Press.
- Peters-Burton, E. E. & Botov, I. S. (2017). Self-regulated learning microanalysis as a tool to inform professional development delivery in real-time. Metacognition and Learning, 12(1), 45–78.
- Rich, Y., & Almozlino, M. (1999). Educational goal preferences among novice and veteran teachers of science and humanities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(6), 613–629. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00010-4
- Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P., & Deci, E. L. (1984). A motivational analysis of self-determination and self-regulation in education. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.) Research on motivation in education (Vol. 2, pp. 13–52). Academic Press.
- Sabers, D. S., Cushing, K. S., & Berliner, D. C. (1991). Differences among teachers in a task characterized by simultaneity, multidimensionality, and immediacy. American Educational Research Journal, 28(1), 63–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1162879
- Sampson, V., & Blanchard, M. R. (2012). Science teachers and scientific argumentation: Trends in views and practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1122–1148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21037
- Santagata, R., & Angelici, G. (2010). Studying the impact of the lesson analysis framework on preservice teachers’ abilities to reflect on videos of classroom teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(4), 339–349. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110369555
- Sato, M., Akita, K., & Iwakawa, N. (1993). Practical thinking styles of teachers: A comparative study of expert and novice thought processes and its implications for rethinking teacher education in Japan. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(4), 100–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01619569309538745
- Schunk, D. H. (1982). Effects of effort attributional feedback on children's perceived self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(4), 548–556. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.4.548
- Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
- Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.
- Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 26–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11431010
- van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Phillipp, R. A. (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 134–151). Routledge.
- van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244–276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005
- Venville, G. J., & Dawson, V. M. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10 students’ argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 952–977. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20358
- White, M. C., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2015). Self-regulation and the common core: Application to ELA standards. Routledge.
- Yin, R. K. (2003). Applications of case study research. Sage.
- Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic.
- Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Goal setting: A key proactive source of academic self-regulation. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.) Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research and applications (pp. 267–295). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 135–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.794676
- Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2002). Acquiring writing revision and self-regulatory skill through observation and emulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 660–668. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.660
- Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). The hidden dimension of personal competence: Self-regulated learning and practice. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 204–222). Guilford Press.
- Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Perceptions of efficacy and strategy use in the self-regulation of learning. In D. H. Schunk and J. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom: Causes and consequences (pp. 185–207). Erlbaum.
- Zohar, A. (2007). Science teacher education and professional development in argumentation. In S. Erduran, & M. Pilar Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 245–268). SpringerPress.