References
- Abdulwahed, M., & Nagy, Z. K. (2009). Applying Kolb's experiential learning cycle for laboratory education. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 283–294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01025.x
- ABET. (2017). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs: 2016–2017. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2016-2017.
- American Association of University Women (AAUW). (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. AAUW.
- Babik, D., Gehringer, E. F., Kidd, J., Pramudianto, F., & Tinapple, D. (2016). Probing the landscape: Toward a systematic taxonomy of online peer assessment systems in education. Paper presented at the CSPRED 2016: Workshop on Computer-Supported Peer Review in Education, Raleigh, NC.
- Ballen, C. J., Salehi, S., & Cotner, S. (2017). Exams disadvantage women in introductory biology. PloS One, 12(10), e0186419. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186419
- Bean, J. C. (2011). Engaging ideas: The professor's guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. Jossey-Bass.
- Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. Basic Books.
- Bell, A. E., Spencer, S. J., Iserman, E., & Logel, C. E. (2003). Stereotype threat and women's performance in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(4), 307–312. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00774.x
- Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
- Biggs, J. (1979). Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education, 8(4), 381–394. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01680526
- Blaney, L., Kandiah, R., Ducoste, J. J., Perlinger, J. A., & Bartelt-Hunt, S. L. (2016). Trends in Population and Demographics of U.S. Environmental Engineering Students and Faculty from 2005 to 2013. Environmental Engineering Science, 33(8), 578–590. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2016.0063
- Brent, D. (2011). Transfer, transformation, and rhetorical knowledge: insights from transfer theory. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 25(4), 396–420. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651911410951
- Canen, A. G., Canen, A., Costa, R. P., (2014). Higher education and the preparation of multicultural global citizens: The case of a technological curriculum. In N. Popov, C. Wolhuter, K. S. Ermenc, G. Hilton, J. Ogunleye, & O. Chigisheva (Eds.), Education’s role in preparing globally competent citizens (Vol. 12, pp. 296–302).BCES Conference Books. Bulgarian Comparative Education Society.
- Carter, M. (2007). Ways of knowing, doing, and writing in the disciplines. College Composition and Communication, 58(3), 385–418.
- Carter, M., Ferzli, M., & Wiebe, E. (2004). Teaching Genre to English First-Language Adults: A Study of the Laboratory Report. Research in the Teaching of English, 38(4), 395–419.
- Chapman, O. L. (1999, March). Calibrated Peer Review (TM). In Abstracts of papers of the American chemical society (Vol. 217, pp. U311-U311). American Chemical Society.
- Chism, N. (2002). Valuing student differences. In W. J. McKeachie (Ed.), McKeachie's teaching tips (Vth ed., pp. 128–147).Houghton Mifflin Company.
- Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education, 48(3), 409–426. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004
- Davies, J. W., Cousin, G. (2002). Engineering students’ writing skills. Proceedings of the International Conference of Engineering Education (pp. 1–6).
- Deiner, L. J., Newsome, D., & Samaroo, D. (2012). Directed self-inquiry: A scaffold for teaching laboratory report writing. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(12), 1511–1514. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/ed300169g
- Dominguez, C., Nascimento, M. M., Payan-Carreira, R., Cruz, G., Silva, H., Lopes, J., Morais, M. d F. A., & Morais, E. (2015). Adding value to the learning process by online peer review activities: Towards the elaboration of a methodology to promote critical thinking in future engineers. European Journal of Engineering Education, 40(5), 573–591. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2014.987649
- Elbow, P. (1998). Writing without teachers (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
- ELI (Educause Learning Initiative). (2005). Calibrated peer review: A writing and critical thinking instructional tool. In Innovations and Implementations: Exemplary Practices in Teaching and Learning. http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI5002.pdf.
- Entwistle, N. (2010). Taking stock: An overview of key research findings. In Christensen Hughes, J., & Mighty, J., (Eds.), Taking stock: Research on teaching and learning in higher education (pp. 15–57). Queen's School of Policy Studies.
- Feisel, L. D., & Rosa, A. J. (2005). The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 121–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00833.x
- Ferzli, M., Carter, M., & Wiebe, E. (2005). LabWrite. Journal of College Science Teaching, 35(3), 31–33.
- Flateby, T., & Fehr, R. (2008). Assessing and improving writing in the engineering curriculum. International Journal of Engineering Education, 24(5), 901.
- Ford, J. D., & Riley, L. A. (2003). Integrating communication and engineering education: A look at curricula, courses, and support systems. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(4), 325–328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00776.x
- Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410–8415. http://www.pnas.org/content/111/23/8410 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
- Furman, B., Robinson, W. (2003, November 5–8). Improving engineering report writing with Calibrated Peer Review. Paper presented at the 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. F3E-14–F3E-15). Boulder, CO.
- Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for educational research. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1167322
- Gerdeman, R. D., Russell, A. A., & Worden, K. J. (2007). Web-based student writing and reviewing in a large biology lecture course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(5), 46.
- Gielen, S., Dochy, F., & Onghena, P. (2011). An inventory of peer assessment diversity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903221444
- Guilford, W. H. (2001). Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing. Advances in Physiology Education, 25(1–4), 167–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1152/advances.2001.25.3.167
- Gunersel, A. B., & Simpson, N. (2009). Improvement in writing and reviewing skills with calibrated peer review. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2), Article 15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030215
- Halden-Sullivan, J. (1996). Reconsidering assessment: From checklist to dialectic. Assessing Writing, 3(2), 173–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1075-2935(96)90012-4
- Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2005). Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education. Prospect, 20(1), 6–30.
- Han, A. (2012, June 10–14). Using Calibrated Peer Review to Encourage Writing. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Conference of the Association of Small Computer Users in Education (p. 23).
- Hannah-Hanh, D. N., & Ryan, A. M. (2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1314–1334. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012702
- Hanson, J. H., & Williams, J. M. (2008). Using writing assignments to improve self‐assessment and communication skills in an engineering statics course. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(4), 515–529. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00997.x
- Hattum-Janssen, N. V., Lourenço, J. (2005). Peer assessment and group work in civil engineering education. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.453.9498&rep=rep1&type=pdf
- Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). Guilford.
- Heylen, C., & Vander Sloten, J. (2013). A technical writing programme implemented in a first-year engineering course at KU Leuven. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(6), 595–607. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2013.794201
- Howell, D. C. (2013). Statistical methods for psychology (8th ed.). Wadsworth.
- Inoue, A. B. (2015). Antiracist writing assessment ecologies: Teaching and assessing writing for a socially just future. The WAC Clearinghouse.
- Kim, S. H., Wise, J., Hillsley, M. (2005). Learning technical writing skills through peer review: Use of Calibrated Peer Review in unit operation lab. Paper Presented at AIChE Annual Meeting, Conference Proceedings.
- Kitano, M. K. (1997). What a course will look like after multicultural change. In A. I. Morey & M. K. Kitano (Eds.), Multicultural course transformation in higher education: A broader truth (pp. 18-34). Allyn and Bacon.
- Krashen, S. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 440–464. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05325.x
- Kroen, W. (2004). Modeling the writing process. Journal of College Science Teaching, 34, 50–53.
- Kuder, K., Gnanapragasam, N. (2011, June 26–29). Implementing peer-reviews in civil engineering laboratories. In Proceedings 118th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
- Lam, R. (2010). A Peer Review Training Workshop: Coaching Students to Give and Evaluate Peer Feedback. TESL Canada Journal, 27(2), 114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v27i2.1052
- Lappalainen, P. (2009). Communication as part of the engineering skills set. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790902752038
- Lattuca, L. R., Terenzini, P. T., & Volkwein, J. F. (2006). Engineering change: A Study of the impact of EC2000. ABET.
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
- Lerner, N. (2007). Laboratory lessons for writing and science. Written Communication, 24(3), 191–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088307302765
- Linley, J. L., & George-Jackson, C. E. (2013). Addressing underrepresentation in STEM fields through undergraduate interventions. New Directions for Student Services, 2013(144), 97–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.20073
- Lord, S. M. (2009). Integrating effective 'writing to communicate' experiences in engineering courses: Guidelines and examples. International Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 196.
- Lu, R., & Bol, L. (2007). A comparison of anonymous versus identifiable e-peer review on college student writing performance and the extent of critical feedback. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(2), 100–115.
- Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I—Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
- Mastascusa, E. J., Snyder, W. J., & Hoyt, B. S. (2011). Effective instruction for STEM disciplines: From learning theory to college teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
- Mayhew, M. J., Rockenbach, A. N., Bowman, N. A., Seifert, T. A., Wolniak, G. C., With Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. Y. (2016). How college affects students (Vol. 3): 21st century evidence that higher education works (Chapter 1). Jossey-Bass.
- McLoughlin, L. (2005). Spotlighting: Emergent gender bias in undergraduate engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(4), 373–381. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00865.x
- Mejia, J., Revelo, R., Villanueva, I., & Mejia, J. (2018). Critical theoretical frameworks in engineering education: An anti-deficit and liberative approach. Education Sciences, 8(4), 158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040158
- Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2006). Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. Routledge.
- Moje, E. B., & Lewis, C. (2007). Examining opportunities to learn literacy: The role of critical sociocultural literacy research. In C. Lewis, P. Enciso, & E.B. Moje (Eds.), Reframing sociocultural research on literacy: Identity, agency, and power (pp. 15–48). Erlbaum.
- Moriarty, M. A. (2007). Inclusive pedagogy: Teaching methodologies to reach diverse learners in science instruction. Equity & Excellence in Education, 40(3), 252–265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680701434353
- Mory, E. H. (2004). Feedback research revisited. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (Vol. 2, pp. 745–783). Erlbaum.
- National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. National Academy Press.
- National Science Foundation. (2014). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/2013/race.cfm.
- Nikolic, S., Suesse, T. F., McCarthy, T. J., & Goldfinch, T. L. (2017). Formative assessment to develop oral communication competency using YouTube: Self-and peer assessment in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(6), 1277–1295. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1298569
- Ohland, M. W., Brawner, C. E., Camacho, M. M., Layton, R. A., Long, R. A., Lord, S. M., & Wasburn, M. H. (2011). Race, gender, and measures of success in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 225–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00012.x
- Panadero, E., Romero, M., & Strijbos, J. W. (2013). The impact of a rubric and friendship on peer assessment: Effects on construct validity, performance, and perceptions of fairness and comfort. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(4), 195–203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.005
- Paretti, M., McNair, L., & Leydens, J. (2014). Engineering communication. In A. Johri & B. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (pp. 601–632). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013451.038
- Pelaez, N. J. (2002). Problem-based writing with peer review improves academic performance in physiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 26(1–4), 174–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00041.2001
- Perkins, D. N. (2007). Theories of difficulty. In N. J. Entwistle & P. D. Tomlinson (Eds.), BJEP Monograph Series II, Number 4 – Student learning and university teaching (pp. 31–48).British Psychological Society.
- Perl, S. (1994). Landmark essays on writing process. Hermagoras Press.
- Perna, L. W., Gasman, M., Gary, S., Lundy, ‐Wagner, V., & Drezner, N. D. (2010). Identifying strategies for increasing degree attainment in STEM: Lessons from minority‐serving institutions. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2010(148), 41–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.360
- Perry, R. P., Hladkyj, S., Pekrun, R. H., & Pelletier, S. T. (2001). Academic control and action control in the achievement of college students: A longitudinal field study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(4), 776–789. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.4.776
- Prain, V. (2006). Learning from writing in secondary science: Some theoretical and practical implications. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 179–201. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500336643
- Price, E., Goldberg, F., Robinson, S., & McKean, M. (2016). Validity of peer grading using Calibrated Peer Review in a guided-inquiry, conceptual physics course. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020145–020141.
- Prichard, J. R. (2005). Writing to learn: An evaluation of the Calibrated Peer Review program in two neuroscience courses. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education : JUNE : A Publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, 4(1), A34–A39.
- Prior, P. (2006). A sociocultural theory of writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 54–66). Guilford.
- Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. The. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273–304. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_2
- Ridgway, D., Young, V. L., Sampson, K. J. (2005). Applying a writing-to-learn strategy in a traditional material science and engineering course. In Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR.
- Robertson, L., & Taczak, K. (Yancey, K.B. 2012). Prior knowledge and its role in transfer. Composition Forum, 26
- Robinson, C. M., & Blair, G. M. (1995). Writing skills training for engineering students in large classes. Higher Education, 30(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384055
- Rudd, J. A., Wang, V. Z., Cervato, C., & Ridky, R. W. (2009). Calibrated Peer Review assignments for the earth sciences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 57(5), 328–334. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5408/1.3559673
- Ruggiero, D., & Harbor, J. (2013). Using writing assignments with Calibrated Peer Review to increase engagement and improve learning in an undergraduate environmental science course. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(2), n2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2013.070221
- Russell, D. R. (2002). Writing in the Academic Disciplines: A Curricular History. SIU Press.
- Russell, A., Chapman, O., & Wegner, P. (1998). Molecular science: Network-deliverable curricula. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(5), 578. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/ed075p578
- Russell, J., Van Horne, S., Ward, A. S., Bettis, E. A., & Gikonyo, J. (2017). Variability in students' evaluating processes in peer assessment with calibrated peer review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12176
- Shaw, D. (2008). Enhancing the laboratory experience using peer evaluation of group laboratory reports in a fluid mechanics course [Paper presentation]. Paper Presented at the 2008 Annual American Society for Engineering Education Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA. https://peer.asee.org/4322
- Shepard, L. A., Penuel, W. R., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2018). Classroom assessment principles to support learning and avoid the harms of testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 52–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12195
- Shuman, L. J., Besterfield-Sacre, M., & McGourty, J. (2005). The ABET “professional skills”—Can they be taught? Can they be assessed? Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00828.x
- Smelser, R. E. (2001). How to build better engineers: A practical approach to the mechanics of text. The Quarterly, 23(4), 32–40.
- Stage, F. K. (2007). Answering critical questions using quantitative data. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2007(133), 5–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.200
- Stage, F. K., & Wells, R. S. (2014). Critical quantitative inquiry in context. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2013(158), 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.20041
- Stern, L. A., & Solomon, A. (2006). Effective faculty feedback: The road less traveled. Assessing Writing, 11(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2005.12.001
- Tonso, K. (2006). Teams that work: Campus culture, engineer identity, and social interactions. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00875.x
- Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Thought and language. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
- Wackerly, J. W. (2018). Stepwise approach to writing journal-style lab reports in the organic chemistry course sequence. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(1), 76–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00630
- Wiebe, E. N., Hare, T. M., Carter, M., Fahmy, Y., Russell, R., Ferzli, M. (2001). Supporting lab report writing in an introductory materials engineering lab. In Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. American Society for Engineering Education.
- Wilson, K., & Devereux, L. (2014). Scaffolding theory: High challenge, high support in Academic Language and Learning (ALL) contexts. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 8(3), A91–A100.
- Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
- Yalvac, B., Smith, H. D., Troy, J. B., & Hirsch, P. (2007). Promoting advanced writing skills in an upper-level engineering class. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00922.x
- Zhao, Y. (1998). The effects of anonymity oncomputer-mediated peer review. International Journal of Educational Telecommunication, 4(4), 311