References
- Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital learning compass: Distance education enrollment report. Babson College.
- Burak, L. (2012). Multitasking in the university classroom. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2012.060208
- Canadian Digital Learning Research Association. (2019). Tracking online education in Canadian universities and colleges. [Data set]. https://onlinelearningsurveycanada.ca/publications
- Eitel, A., & Kühl, T. (2018). Editorial: Harmful or helpful to learning? The impact of seductive details on learning and instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3513
- Farley, J., Risko, E. F., & Kingstone, A. (2013). Everyday attention and lecture retention: The effects of time, fidgeting, and mind wandering. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00619
- Garner, R., Gillingham, M. G., & White, C. S. (1989). Effects of “seductive details” on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition and Instruction, 6(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0601_2
- Gorissen, P., van Bruggen, J., & Jochems, W. (2012). Students and recorded lectures: Survey on current use and demands for higher education. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 297–311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.17299
- Harp, S. F., & Maslich, A. A. (2005). The consequences of including seductive details during lecture. Teaching of Psychology, 32(2), 100–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3202_4
- Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1997). The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations. On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.92
- Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 414–434. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.414
- Ketxer-Noltge, A., Schweppe, J., & Rummer, R. (2018). Is the seductive details effect moderated by mood? An eye tracking study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33, 62–70.
- Killingsworth, M. A., & Gilbert, D. T. (2010). A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science (New York, N.Y.), 330(6006), 932–932. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1192439
- Kim, J., Guo, P. J., Seaton, D. T., Mitros, P., Gajos, K. Z., Miller, R. C. (2014). Understanding in-video dropouts and interaction peaks in online lecture videos. Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale Conference, 31–40.
- Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2006). Illusions of competence during study can be remedied by manipulations that enhance learners' sensitivity to retrieval conditions at test. Memory & Cognition, 34(5), 959–972. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193244
- Kühl, T., Moersdorf, F., Römer, M., & Münzer, S. (2018). Adding emotionality to seductive details—Consequences for learning? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3477
- Magner, U. I. E., Schwonke, R., Aleven, V., Popescu, O., & Renkl, A. (2014). Triggering situational interest by decorative illustrations both fosters and hinders learning in computer-based learning environments. Learning and Instruction, 29, 141–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.07.002
- Martin, L., Mills, C., D’Mello, S. K., & Risko, E. F. (2018). Re-watching lectures as a study strategy and its effect on mind wandering. Experimental Psychology, 65(5), 297–305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000412
- Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions?. Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3201_1
- Mayer, R. E. (1999). Multimedia aids to problem-solving transfer. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(7), 611–623. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00027-0
- Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 226–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4
- Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning (1st ed.). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–48). Cambridge University Press.
- Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 484–490. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.4.484
- Mayer, R. E., Griffith, E., Jurkowitz, I. T. N., & Rothman, D. (2008). Increased interestingness of extraneous details in a multimedia science presentation leads to decreased learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 329–339.
- Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 187–198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.187
- Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
- McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2012). Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(2), 302–320. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025250
- Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method‐ affects‐learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 149–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00170.x
- Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments: Special issue on interactive learning environments, contemporary issues and trends. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309–326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2
- Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358–368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.358
- Najjar, L. J. (1996). Multimedia information and learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5, 129–150.
- Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1
- Park, B., Moreno, R., Seufert, T., & Brünken, R. (2011). Does cognitive load moderate the seductive details effect? A multimedia study. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.006
- Park, B., Plass, F., & Brunken, R. (2014). Cognitive and affective processes in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 125–127.
- Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
- Pekrun, R. (2011). Emotions as drivers of learning and cognitive development. In Calvo R., D’Mello S. (eds.), New perspectives on affect and learning technologies. Explorations in the learning sciences. Instructional systems and performance technologies, vol. 3. Springer.
- Phillips, N. E., Mills, C., D’Mello, S., & Risko, E. F. (2016). On the influence of re-reading on mind wandering. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(12), 2338–2357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1107109
- Ralph, B. C. W., Thomson, D. R., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2014). Media multitasking and failures of attention in everyday life. Psychological Research, 78(5), 661–668. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0523-7
- Risko, E. F., Anderson, N., Sarwal, A., Engelhardt, M., & Kingstone, A. (2012). Everyday attention: Variation in mind wandering and memory in a lecture. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(2), 234–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1814
- Risko, E. F., Buchanan, D., Medimorec, S., & Kingstone, A. (2013). Everyday attention: Mind wandering and computer use during lectures. Computers & Education, 68, 275–283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.001
- Sanchez, C. A., & Wiley, J. (2006). An examination of the seductive details effect in terms of working memory capacity. Memory & Cognition, 34(2), 344–355. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193412
- Seli, P., Risko, E. F., & Smilek, D. (2016). On the Necessity of Distinguishing Between Unintentional and Intentional Mind Wandering. Psychological Science, 27(5), 685–691. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616634068 26993740
- Seli, P., Carriere, J. S. A., & Smilek, D. (2015). Not all mind wandering is created equal: dissociating deliberate from spontaneous mind wandering. Psychological Research, 79(5), 750–758. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0617-x 25284016
- Seli, P., Risko, E. F., Smilek, D., & Schacter, D. L. (2016a). Mind-wandering with and without intention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 605–617. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.010
- Seli, P., Wammes, J. D., Risko, E. F., & Smilek, D. (2016b). On the relation between motivation and retention in educational contexts: The role of intentional and unintentional mind wandering. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1280–1287. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0979-0
- Smallwood, J., Fitzgerald, A., Miles, L. K., & Phillips, L. H. (2009). Shifting moods, wandering minds: Negative moods lead the mind to wander. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 9(2), 271–276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014855
- Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 946–958. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.946
- Stawarczyk, D., Majerus, S., & D’Argembeau, A. (2013). Concern-induced negative affect is associated with the occurrence and content of mind-wandering. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(2), 442–448. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.01.012
- Strobel, B., Grund, S., & Lindner, M. A. (2019). Do seductive details do their damage in the context of graph comprehension? Insights from eye movements. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3491
- Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). When graphics improve liking but not learning from online lessons. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1618–1625. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.026
- Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295–312. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
- Szpunar, K. K., Moulton, S. T., & Schacter, D. L. (2013). Mind wandering and education: From the classroom to online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00495
- Unsworth, N., & McMillan, B. D. (2013). Mind wandering and reading comprehension: Examining the roles of working memory capacity, interest, motivation, and topic interest. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 39, 832–842.
- Wammes, J. D., Seli, P., Cheyne, A. J., Boucher, P. O., & Smilek, D. (2016). Mind wandering during lectures II: Relation to academic performance. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 2(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000055
- Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063
- Wilson, K. E., Martinez, M., Mills, C., D’Mello, S., Smilek, D., & Risko, E. F. (2018). Instructor presence effect: Liking does not always lead to learning. Computers & Education, 122, 205–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.011