Exploring the interplay between attributions and metacognitive monitoring ability in a post-secondary classroom

References

• Bar-Tal, D., & Bar-Zohar, Y. (1977). The relationship between perception of locus of control and academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(77)90020-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bol, L., Hacker, D. J., O'Shea, P., & Allen, D. (2005). The influence of overt practice, achievement level, and explanatory style on calibration accuracy and performance. The Journal of Experimental Education, 73(4), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.73.4.269-290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bol, L., Hacker, D. J., Walck, C. C., & Nunnery, J. A. (2012). The effects of individual or group guidelines on the calibration accuracy and achievement of high school biology students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(4), 280–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borkowski, J. G., Chan, L. K. S., & Muthukrishna, N. (2000). A process-oriented model of metacognition: Links between motivation and executive functioning. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 1–43). Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, L., & Nietfeld, J. L. (2007). College students’ metacognitive awareness of difficulties in learning the class content does not automatically lead to adjustment of study strategies. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 7, 31–46.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, L. K. (1996). Motivational orientations and metacognitive abilities of intellectually gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40(4), 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629604000403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Carvalho Filho, M. K. (2009). Confidence judgments in real classroom settings: Monitoring performance in different types of tests. International Journal of Psychology: Journal International de Psychologie, 44(2), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590701436744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Carvalho Filho, M. K. (2010). Assessing changes in performance and monitoring processes in individual and collaborative tests according to students' metacognitive skills. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(7), 1107–1136. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440903336555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, N. L., Was, C. A., Dunlosky, J., & Isaacson, R. M. (2017). Even after thirteen class exams, students are still overconfident: The role of memory for past exam performance in student predictions. Metacognition and Learning, 12(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-016-9158-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., & Bahbahani, K. (2008). Explaining calibration accuracy in classroom contexts: The effects of incentives, reflection, and explanatory style. Metacognition and Learning, 3(2), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9021-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., Horgan, D. D., & Rakow, E. A. (2000). Test prediction and performance in a classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., & Keener, M. C. (2008). Metacognition in education: A focus on calibration. In J. Dunlosky & R. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of memory and metacognition (pp. 429–455). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ku, K. Y. L., & Ho, I. T. (2010). Metacognitive strategies that enhance critical thinking. Metacognition and Learning, 5(3), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9060-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2002.12086158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuley, E., Duncan, T. E., & Russell, D. W. (1992). Measuring causal attributions: The revised causal dimension scale (CDSII). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(5), 566–573. [Database] https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292185006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition. ? In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 1–27). MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom. The Journal of Experimental Educational, 74, 7–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2006). The effect of distributed monitoring exercises and feedback on performance, monitoring accuracy, and self-efficacy. Metacognition and Learning, 1(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-006-9595-6
   Google Scholar
• Nietfeld, J. L., Enders, C. K., & Schraw, G. (2006). A Monte Carlo comparison of measures of relative and absolute monitoring accuracy. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(2), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164404273945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormrod, J. E. (2002). Educational psychology: Developing learners (4th ed.). Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G. (2009). A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9031-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. (2008). Attributions as motivators of self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 245–266). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (1983). Ability versus effort attributional feedback: Differential effects on self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(6), 848–856. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.75.6.848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soric, I., & Palekčic, M. (2009). The role of students’ interests in self-regulated learning: The relationship between students’ interests, learning strategies and causal attributions. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24, 545–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, I., & Oakhill, J. (1996). Do levels of interest have an effect on children's comprehension monitoring performance? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(4), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1996.tb01213.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Staley, R., & DuBois, N. (2004). Metacognition and self-regulated learning constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(2), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1076/edre.10.2.117.27905
   Google Scholar
• Tolli, A. P., & Schmidt, A. M. (2008). The role of feedback, causal attributions, and self-efficacy in goal revision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 692. https://doi.org/10.1037/t05324-000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
   Google Scholar
• Vrugt, A., & Oort, F. J. (2008). Metacognition, achievement goals, study strategies and academic achievement: Pathways to achievement. Metacognition and Learning, 3(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9022-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (1972). Attribution theory, achievement motivation, and the educational process. Review of Educational Research, 42(2), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543042002203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice, (pp.277–304). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. A., Fan, W., & Daugherty, S. G. (2013). Examining achievement goals and causal attributions together as predictors of academic functioning. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81(3), 295–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2012.700498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulated learning (pp. 13–39). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 299–315). Routledge.
   Google Scholar