Improving Learning Effects of Student-Led and Teacher-Led Discussion Contingent on Prediscussion Activity

References

• Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almasi, J. F., & Garas-York, K. (2014). Comprehension and discussion of text. In Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 494–517). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bae, C. L., & DeBusk-Lane, M. (2018). Motivation belief profiles in science: Links to classroom goal structures and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, C. L., & Lai, M. H. C. (2020). Opportunities to participate in science learning and student engagement: A mixed methods approach to examining person and context factors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(6), 1128–1153. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, C. L., Mills, D. C., Zhang, F., Sealy, M., Cabrera, L., & Sea, M. (2021). A systematic review of science discourse in K–12 urban classrooms in the United States: Accounting for individual, collective, and contextual factors. Review of Educational Research, 91(6), 831–877. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211042415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Sandora, C., Kucan, L., & Worthy, J. (1996). Questioning the author: A yearlong classroom implementation to engage students with text. The Elementary School Journal, 96(4), 385–414. https://doi.org/10.1086/461835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billings, D. M., & Halstead, J. A. (2019). Teaching in nursing e-book: A guide for faculty. Elsevier Health Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2
   Google Scholar
• Bonawitz, E., Shafto, P., Gweon, H., Goodman, N. D., Spelke, E., & Schulz, L. (2011). The double-edged sword of pedagogy: Instruction limits spontaneous exploration and discovery. Cognition, 120(3), 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. (2009). Active‐constructive‐interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., Adams, J., Bogusch, E. B., Bruchok, C., Kang, S., Lancaster, M., Levy, R., Li, N., McEldoon, K. L., Stump, G. S., Wylie, R., Xu, D., & Yaghmourian, D. L. (2018). Translating the ICAP theory of cognitive engagement into practice. Cognitive Science, 42(6), 1777–1832. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, S. D., Chi, M. T. H., & VanLehn, K. (2009). Improving classroom learning by collaboratively observing human tutoring videos while problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 779–789. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davin, K. J. (2013). Integration of dynamic assessment and instructional conversations to promote development and improve assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813482934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(39), 19251–19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S. (2016). Engagement: Where to next? Learning and Instruction, 43, 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., Zottmann, J., & Weinberger, A. (2013). Collaboration scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. In The international handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 403–419). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadgil, S., & Nokes‐Malach, T. J. (2012). Overcoming collaborative inhibition through error correction: A classroom experiment. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(3), 410–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garas-York, K., & Almasi, J. F. (2017). Constructing meaning through discussion. Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension, 2, 500–525.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., & Humenick, N. M. (2004). Motivating students to read: Evidence for classroom practices that increase reading motivation and achievement.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Davis, M. H., Scafiddi, N. T., & Tonks, S. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.) Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, M., Anderson, R. C., Wilkinson, I. A. G., & Yi, H. (1992). Properties of attention during reading lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(2), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.2.160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help? Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1158654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 379–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802212669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirch, S. A., & Siry, C. A. (2012). ‘Maybe the algae was from the filter’: Maybe and similar modifiers as mediational tools and indicators of uncertainty and possibility in children’s science talk. Research in Science Education, 42(2), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9197-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. New York, NY: Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kyndt, E., Raes, E., Lismont, B., Timmers, F., Cascallar, E., & Dochy, F. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings? Educational Research Review, 10, 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, R., & Kapur, M. (2018). Preparation for future collaboration: Cognitively preparing for learning from collaboration. The Journal of Experimental Education, 86(4), 546–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1386156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, R., & Muldner, K. (2017). Manipulating cognitive engagement in preparation-to-collaborate tasks and the effects on learning. Learning and Instruction, 52, 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Choi, H. (2019). Rethinking the flipped learning pre‐class: Its influence on the success of flipped learning and related factors. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, L. A., & Dole, J. A. (2006). Help with teaching reading comprehension: Comprehension instructional frameworks. The Reading Teacher, 59(8), 742–753. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.59.8.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, J., Ko, H., Park, J., & Ihm, J. (2022). Effect of active learning and online discussions on the academic performances of dental students. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 312. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03377-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, J., Ko, H., Yang, J. W., Kim, S., Lee, S., Chun, M. S., Ihm, J., & Park, J. (2019). Active learning through discussion: ICAP framework for education in health professions. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 477. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1901-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, J., & Park, J. (2023). Self-study enhances the learning effect of discussions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2023.2185148
   Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Rogat, T. K., & Koskey, K. L. K. (2011). Affect and engagement during small group instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loibl, K., Roll, I., & Rummel, N. (2017). Towards a theory of when and how problem solving followed by instruction supports learning. Educational Psychology Review, 29(4), 693–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9379-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi, D., Bailey, J. M., Bickel, E. S., & Burrell, S. (2018). Scaffolding scientific thinking: Students’ evaluations and judgments during earth science knowledge construction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 184–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi, D., Shipley, T. F., Bailey, J. M., Bretones, P. S., Prather, E. E., Ballen, C. J., Knight, J. K., Smith, M. K., Stowe, R. L., Cooper, M. M., Prince, M., Atit, K., Uttal, D. H., LaDue, N. D., McNeal, P. M., Ryker, K., St. John, K., van der Hoeven Kraft, K. J., & Docktor, J. L., Astronomy Team, Biology Team, Chemistry Team, Engineering Team, Geography Team, Geoscience Team, and Physics Team. (2021). The curious construct of active learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 22(1), 8–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620973974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, S. L., Guthrie, J. T., & Davis, M. H. (2006). Scaffolding for engagement in elementary school reading instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.1.3-20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manz, E., & Renga, I. P. (2017). Understanding how teachers guide evidence construction conversations. Science Education, 101(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menekse, M., & Chi, M. T. H. (2019). The role of collaborative interactions versus individual construction on students’ learning of engineering concepts. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(5), 702–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1538324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. K. (1993). What is scaffolded instruction? Definitions, distinguishing features, and misnomers. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 42, 41–53.
   Google Scholar
• Morocco, C. C., & Hindin, A. (2002). The role of conversation in a thematic understanding of literature. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17(3), 144–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00041
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., Firetto, C. M., Wei, L., Li, M., & Croninger, R. M. V. (2016). What REALLY works: Optimizing classroom discussions to promote comprehension and critical-analytic thinking. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215624215
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., Greene, J. A., Firetto, C. M., Hendrick, B. D., Li, M., Montalbano, C., & Wei, L. (2018). Quality talk: Developing students’ discourse to promote high-level comprehension. American Educational Research Journal, 55(5), 1113–1160. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218771303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., Wilkinson, I. A. G., Soter, A. O., Hennessey, M. N., & Alexander, J. F. (2009). Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 740–764. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nokes-Malach, T. J., Richey, J. E., & Gadgil, S. (2015). When is it better to learn together? Insights from research on collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 645–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9312-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patall, E. A., Pituch, K. A., Steingut, R. R., Vasquez, A. C., Yates, N., & Kennedy, A. A. U. (2019). Agency and high school science students’ motivation, engagement, and classroom support experiences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 62, 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2019.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 259–282). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Poh, M. Z., Swenson, N. C., & Picard, R. W. (2010). A wearable sensor for unobtrusive, long-term assessment of electrodermal activity. IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering, 57(5), 1243–1252. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2009.2038487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raphael, T. E., & McMahon, S. I. (1994). Book club: An alternative framework for reading instruction. The Reading Teacher, 48(2), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.48.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, E. L., & Ekman, P. (1994). Coherence between expressive and experiential systems in emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 8(3), 201–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939408408938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schalk, L., Schumacher, R., Barth, A., & Stern, E. (2018). When problem-solving followed by instruction is superior to the traditional tell-and-practice sequence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(4), 596–610. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, H. G., Cohen-Schotanus, J., Van Der Molen, H. T., Splinter, T. A. W., Bulte, J., Holdrinet, R., & Van Rossum, H. J. M. (2010). Learning more by being taught less: A “time-for-self-study” theory explaining curricular effects on graduation rate and study duration. Higher Education, 60(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9300-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, H. G., Wagener, S. L., Smeets, G. A. C. M., Keemink, L. M., & van Der Molen, H. T. (2015). On the use and misuse of lectures in higher education. Health Professions Education, 1(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2015.11.010
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 475–5223. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1604_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, A. M. (1995). Philosophy for children and the development of ethical values. Early Child Development and Care, 107(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443951070106
   Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (2013). Cooperative learning and achievement: Theory and research. In Handbook of Psychology, vol. 7, 2nd ed., edited by W. Reynolds, G. Miller, and I. Weiner, 199–212. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Stains, M., Harshman, J., Barker, M. K., Chasteen, S. V., Cole, R., DeChenne-Peters, S. E., Eagan, M. K., Esson, J. M., Knight, J. K., Laski, F. A., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Lee, C. J., Lo, S. M., McDonnell, L. M., McKay, T. A., Michelotti, N., Musgrove, A., Palmer, M. S., Plank, K. M., … Young, A. M. (2018). Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities. Science (New York, NY), 359(6383), 1468–1470. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8892
   Google Scholar
• Sun, J., Anderson, R. C., Lin, T. J., Morris, J. A., Miller, B. W., Ma, S., Thi Nguyen-Jahiel, K., & Scott, T. (2022). Children’s engagement during collaborative learning and direct instruction through the lens of participant structure. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 69, 102061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsovaltzi, D., Judele, R., Puhl, T., & Weinberger, A. (2015). Scripts, individual preparation and group awareness support in the service of learning in Facebook: How does CSCL compare to social networking sites? Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 577–592. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Pol, J., Mercer, N., & Volman, M. (2019). Scaffolding student understanding in small-group work: Students’ uptake of teacher support in subsequent small-group interaction. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(2), 206–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1522258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
   Google Scholar
• Waggoner, M., Chinn, C., Yi, H., & Anderson, R. C. (1995). Collaborative reasoning about stories. Language Arts, 72(8), 582–589.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2012). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In DH Schunk & BJ Zimmerman (eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 297-314).
   Google Scholar
• Wortham, S. (2006). Learning identity. The joint emergence of social identification and academic learning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, X., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., & Miller, B. (2013). Enhancing motivation and engagement through collaborative discussion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 622–632. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yannier, N., Hudson, S. E., Koedinger, K. R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Munakata, Y., Doebel, S. E., Schwartz, D. L., Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L., Callaghan, K., Theobald, E. J., Freeman, S., Cooper, K. M., & Brownell, S. E. (2021). Active learning: “hands-on” meets “minds-on. Science (New York, NY), 374(6563), 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj9957
   Google Scholar