Does the Timing of Visual Support Affect Sentence Comprehension? An Eye-Tracking Study

References

• Aacheson, D. J., Wellu, J. B., & MacDonald, M. C. (2008). New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 278–289. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.1.278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alemdag, E., & Cagiltay, K. (2018). A systematic review of eye tracking research on multimedia learning. Computers & Education, 125, 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.023
   Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashby, J., Rayner, K., & Clifton, C. (2005). Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: Differential effects of frequency and predictability. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 58(6), 1065–1086. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2021). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-27.1. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Bischl, B., Lang, M., Bossek, J., Horn, D., Richter, J., & Surmann, D. (2017). BBmisc: Miscellaneous helper functions for B. Bischl. R package version 1.11. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BBmisc/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Brookshire, J., Scharff, L. F. V., & Moses, L. E. (2002). The influence of illustrations on children’s book preferences and comprehension. Reading Psychology, 23(4), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/713775287
   Google Scholar
• Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students’ learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013176309260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dowdall, N., Melendez-Torres, G. J., Murray, L., Gardner, F., Hartford, L., & Cooper, P. J. (2020). Shared picture book reading interventions for child language development: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Development, 91(2), e383–e399. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Eitel, A., & Scheiter, K. (2015). Picture or text first? Explaining sequence effects when learning with pictures and text. Educational Psychology Review, 27(1), 153–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9264-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eitel, A., Scheiter, K., & Schüler, A. (2013). How inspecting a picture affects processing of text in multimedia learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(4), 451–461. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., Foucart, A., & Engelhardt, P. E. (2013). Language processing in the visual world: Effects of preview, visual complexity, and prediction. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(3), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, K., & Reese, E. (2005). Picture book reading with young children: A conceptual framework. Developmental Review, 25(1), 64–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2004.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, D., Zhang, S., Wright, K. L., & McTigue, E. M. (2020). Do you get the picture? A meta-analysis of the effect of graphics on reading comprehension. AERA Open, 6(1), 233285842090169. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420901696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M. (2017). Gaze control as prediction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbing, A. N., & Rankin-Erickson, J. L. (2003). A picture is worth a thousand words: Using visual images to improve comprehension for middle school struggling readers. The Reading Teacher, 56(8), 758–770. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20205292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., Rommers, J., & Meyer, A. S. (2011). Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Hyönä, J., & Olson, R. K. (1995). Eye fixation patterns among dyslexic and normal readers: Effects of word length and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(6), 1430–1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.6.1430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyönä, J., Lorch, R. F., & Rinck, M. (2003). Eye movement measures to study global text processing. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. B. T. Deubel (Eds.), The mind’s eye (pp. 313–334). North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044451020-4/50018-9
   Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(6), 431–439. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40(10–12), 1489–1506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00163-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumle, L., Võ, M. L. H., & Draschkow, D. (2021). Estimating power in (generalized) linear mixed models: An open introduction and tutorial in R. Behavior Research Methods, 53(6), 2528–2543. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01546-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumle, L., Võ, M. L.-H., & Draschkow, D. (2018). Mixedpower: A library for estimating simulation-based power for mixed models in R. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1341047
   Google Scholar
• Leech, G., Rayson, P., & Wilson, A. (2001). Word frequencies in written and spoken English: Based on the British National Corpus. Longman. Retrieved from http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/bncfreq/
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRae, K., Brown, K. S., & Elman, J. L. (2021). Prediction-based learning and processing of event knowledge. Topics in Cognitive Science, 13(1), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montag, J. L., Jones, M. N., & Smith, L. B. (2015). The words children hear: Picture books and the statistics for language learning. Psychological Science, 26(9), 1489–1496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615594361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M., & Gordon, P. C. (2015). Reading ability and print exposure: Item response theory analysis of the author recognition test. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1095–1109. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0534-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, J. (1969). Categories of interference: Verbal mediation and conflict in card sorting. British Journal of Psychology, 60(3), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1969.tb01204.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qu, Q., Zhang, Q., & Damian, M. F. (2016). Tracking the time course of lexical access in orthographic production: An event-related potential study of word frequency effects in written picture naming. Brain and Language, 159, 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14(3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Fischer, M. H. (1996). Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(5), 734–747. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., & Raney, G. E. (1996). Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 22(5), 1188–1200. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.22.5.1188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(4), 445–476. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x03000104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivero-Contreras, M., Engelhardt, P. E., & Saldaña, D. (2021). An experimental eye-tracking study of text adaptation for readers with dyslexia: Effects of visual support and word frequency. Annals of Dyslexia, 71(1), 170–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-021-00217-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivero-Contreras, M., Engelhardt, P. E., & Saldaña, D. (2023). Do easy-to-read adaptations really facilitate sentence processing for adults with a lower level of education? An experimental eye-tracking study. Learning and Instruction, 84, 101731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheepers, C., Sturt, P., Martin, C. J., Myachykov, A., Teevan, K., & Viskupova, I. (2011). Structural priming across cognitive domains: From simple arithmetic to relative-clause attachment. Psychological Science, 22(10), 1319–1326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611416997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A., White, S. J., Drieghe, D., Hollway, E. C., & Rayner, K. (2010). Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 36(5), 1280–1293. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strouse, G. A., Nyhout, A., & Ganea, P. A. (2018). The role of book features in young children’s transfer of information from picture books to real-world contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(50), 50. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00050
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takacs, Z. K., & Bus, A. G. (2018). How pictures in picture storybooks support young children’s story comprehension: An eye-tracking experiment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 174, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.04.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasik, B. A., Hindman, A. H., & Snell, E. K. (2016). Book reading and vocabulary development: A systematic review. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 37, 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wassenburg, S. I., de Koning, B. B., Bos, L. T., & van der Schoot, M. (2020). Inspecting a picture before reading affects attentional processing but not comprehension. Educational Psychology, 40(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1645306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whaley, C. P. (1978). Word—Nonword classification time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90110-X
   Google Scholar