Investigating a Novel Approach to Assessing Vocabulary Knowledge

References

• Akbasli, S., Sahin, M., & Yaykiran, Z. (2016). The effect of reading comprehension on the performance in science and mathematics. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(16), 108–121.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., & the Disciplined Reading and Learning Research Laboratory, (2012a). Reading into the future: Competence for the 21st century. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A, & the Disciplined Reading and Learning Research Laboratory (2012b). Test of Relational Reasoning. University of Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A, & the Disciplined Reading and Learning Research Laboratory (2014). Verbal Test of Relational Reasoning. University of Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A, & the Disciplined Reading and Learning Research Laboratory (2018). Test of Relational Reasoning-Junior (copyright pending). University of Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., Dumas, D., Grossnickle, E. M., List, A., & Firetto, C. M. (2016). Measuring relational reasoning. The Journal of Experimental Education, 84(1), 119–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2014.963216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1991). Domain knowledge and analogic reasoning ability as predictors of expository text comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 23(2), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969109547735
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., Singer, L. M., Jablansky, S., & Hattan, C. (2016). Relational reasoning in word and in figure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(8), 1140–1152. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000110
   Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (Eds.). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77–117). International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (1985). Teaching vocabulary: Making the instruction fit the goal. Educational Perspectives, 23(1), 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2013). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guildford.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, S., Urrutia, K., Buenger, A., Gonzalez, N., Hunt, M., & Eisenhart, C. (2010). A review of the current research on vocabulary instruction. National Reading Technical Assistance Center, RMC Research Corporation. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, E., Jenkins, F., Bitterman, A., & Keller, B. (2011). A longitudinal view of the receptive vocabulary and math achievement of young children with disabilities. NCSER 2011-3006. National Center for Special Education Research.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, E. (2022). Reliability and omega hierarchical in multidimensional data: A comparison of various estimators. Psychological Methods, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. T. (2012). The importance of vocabulary for science learning. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 48(2), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2012.680372
   Google Scholar
• Deane, P., Lawless, R. R., Li, C., Sabatini, J., Bejar, I. I., & O'Reilly, T. (2014). Creating vocabulary item types that measure students’ depth of semantic knowledge. ETS Research Report Series, 2014(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12001
   Google Scholar
• Dumas, D., & Alexander, P. A. (2016). Calibration of the test of relational reasoning. Psychological Assessment, 28(10), 1303–1318. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, D., Alexander, P. A., Baker, L. M., Jablansky, S., & Dunbar, K. N. (2014). Relational reasoning in medical education: Patterns in discourse and diagnosis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 1021–1035. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, D., & Schmidt, L. (2015). Relational reasoning as predictor for engineering ideation success using TRIZ. Journal of Engineering Design, 26(1-3), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2015.1020287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). PPVT-III: peabody picture vocabulary test: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Dunston, P. J., & Tyminski, A. M. (2013). What’s the Big Deal about Vocabulary? Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 19(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.19.1.0038
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., & Maravilla, F. (2018). Analogical reasoning. In L. J. Ball & V. A. Thompson (Eds.), International handbook of thinking & reasoning (pp. 186–203). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step. A simple study guide and reference. Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami, U. (1992). Essays in developmental psychology. Analogical reasoning in children. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Grossnickle, E. M., Dumas, D., Alexander, P. A., & Baggetta, P. (2016). Individual differences in the process of relational reasoning. Learning and Instruction, 42, 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattan, C. (2019). Prompting rural students’ use of background knowledge and experience to support comprehension of unfamiliar content. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(4), 451–455. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hau, K.-T., Wen, Z.-L., & Cheng, Z.-J. (2004). Structural equation modeling (SEM) and its application. Educational Science Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, M. S., Moore, T. M., Axelrud, L. K., Tottenham, N., Zuo, X. N., Rohde, L. A., Milham, M. P., Satterthwaite, T. D., & Salum, G. A. (2022). Reliability and validity of bifactor models of dimensional psychopathology in youth. Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science, 131(4), 407–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000749
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoover, H. D., Dunbar, S. B., & Frisbie, D. A. (2001). Iowa tests of basic skills (ITBS) forms A, B, and C. Riverside Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, M. (2013). The argument-based approach to validation. School Psychology Review, 42(4), 448–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2013.12087465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klix, F. (1992). Higher order learning mechanisms in knowledge domain. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie Mit Zeitschrift Für Angewandte Psychologie, 200(2), 91–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (1985). Factor analysis and related methods. Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McNeish, D. (2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 412–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meara, P. (1984). The study of lexis in interlanguage. In A. Davies, C. Criper, & A. Howatt (Eds.), Interlanguage (pp. 225–235). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meara, P. (1990). Some notes on the Eurocentres vocabulary tests. In J. Tommola (Ed.), Foreign Language Comprehension and Production (pp. 103–113). Turku: AFinLa Yearbook.
   Google Scholar
• Meara, P., & Buxton, B. (1987). An alternative to multiple choice vocabulary tests. Language Testing, 4(2), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228700400202
   Google Scholar
• Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., & Stevenson, J. (2004). Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary, and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 40(5), 665–681. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (2017). Mplus. In van der Linden (Ed.), Handbook of item response theory (pp. 548–560). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy, W., & Scott, J. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 269–284). Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH publication No. 00-4769). U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. (1983). Testing and teaching vocabulary. Guidelines, 5, 12–25.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Olinghouse, N. G., & Wilson, J. (2013). The relationship between vocabulary and writing quality in three genres. Reading and Writing, 26(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9392-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. B. (1993). Reading comprehension and second language development in a comprehension-based ESL program. TESL Canada Journal, 11(1), 09–29. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v11i1.623
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., Hiebert, E. H., & Kamil, M. L. (2007). Vocabulary assessment: What we know and what we need to learn. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 282–296. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.42.2.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proitsi, P., Hamilton, G., Tsolaki, M., Lupton, M., Daniilidou, M., Hollingworth, P., Archer, N., Foy, C., Stylios, F., McGuinness, B., Todd, S., Lawlor, B., Gill, M., Brayne, C., Rubinsztein, D. C., Owen, M., Williams, J., Craig, D., Passmore, P., Lovestone, S., & Powell, J. F. (2011). A multiple indicators multiple causes (MIMIC) model of behavioural and psychological symptoms in dementia (BPSD). Neurobiology of Aging, 32(3), 434–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, J. (1993). The development of a new measure of L2 vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing, 10(3), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229301000308
   Google Scholar
• Read, J. (1998). Validating a test to measure depth of vocabulary knowledge. In A. Kunnan (Ed.), Validation in language assessment (pp. 41–60). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Read, J. A. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, F. P., Speece, D. L., & Cooper, D. H. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of the connection between oral language and early reading. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(5), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N. (1998). Quantifying word association responses: What is native-like? System, 26(3), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(98)00019-0
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N. (1998). Tracking the incremental acquisition of second language vocabulary: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 48(2), 281–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., Tabors, P. O., Nicholson, P. A., & Kurland, B. F. (1995). SHELL: Oral language and early literacy skills in kindergarten and first-grade children. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 10(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568549509594686
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, R. (2003). A brief history of the paradox: Philosophy and the labyrinths of the mind. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sprenger, A. M., Atkins, S. M., Bolger, D. J., Harbison, J. I., Novick, J. M., Chrabaszcz, J. S., Weems, S. A., Smith, V., Bobb, S., Bunting, M. F., & Dougherty, M. R. (2013). Training working memory: Limits of transfer. Intelligence, 41(5), 638–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stæhr, L. S. (2008). Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730802389975
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Conway, B. E., Ketron, J. L., & Bernstein, M. (1981). People’s conceptions of intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.1.37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taboada, A. (2012). Relationships of general vocabulary, science vocabulary, and student questioning with science comprehension in students with varying levels of English proficiency. Instructional Science, 40(6), 901–923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9196-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Washington. (2021). Understanding item analyses. Retrieved from https://www.washington.edu/assessment/scanning-scoring__trashed/scoring/reports/item-analysis/
   Google Scholar
• Wainer, H., & Thissen, D. (2001). True score theory: The traditional method. In D. Thissen & H. Wainer (Eds.), Test scoring (pp. 23–72). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, S., & Nation, P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Oxford University Press. Indonesian JELT: Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v12i1.1458
   Google Scholar
• Wesche, M., & Paribakht, T. S. (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: Depth versus breadth. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(1), 13–40. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.53.1.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, H., Alexander, P. A., & Sun, Y. (2021). Relational reasoning’s contributions to mathematical thinking and performance in Chinese elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(2), 279–303. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, H., Li, X., & Chen, S. (2022). Development of a brief therapist presence inventory in China using multilevel factor analysis and item response theory. Psychotherapy Research: Journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, 33(4), 508–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2022.2143301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar