Myopic loss aversion or equate-to-differentiate heuristic? A heuristic decision making model for both single and aggregated plays

References

• Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Myopic loss aversion and the equity risk premium. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(1), 73–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1999). Risk aversion or myopia? Choices in repeated gambles and retirement investments. Management Science, 45(3), 364–381. doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.3.364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blavatskyy, P. R., & Pogrebna, G. (2010). Reevaluating evidence on myopic loss aversion: aggregate patterns versus individual choices. Theory and Decision, 68(1-2), 159–171. doi:10.1007/s11238-009-9143-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blavatskyy, P., & Pogrebna, G. (2009). Myopic loss aversion revisited. Economics Letters, 104(1), 43–45. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2009.03.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandstätter, E., Gigerenzer, G., & Hertwig, R. (2006). The priority heuristic: Making choices without trade-offs. Psychological Review, 113(2), 409–432. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeKay, M. L., Schley, D. R., Miller, S. A., Erford, B. M., Sun, J., Karim, M. N., & Lanyon, M. B. (2016). The persistence of common-ratio effects in multiple-play decisions. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(4), 361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand, R. B., Lloyd, P., & Wee Tee, H. (2004). Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle reconsidered. Finance Research Letters, 1(3), 171–177. doi:10.1016/j.frl.2004.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, D., & Stracca, L. (2007). Myopic loss aversion, disappointment aversion, and the equity premium puzzle. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 64(2), 250–268. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2005.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1999). Betting on one good reason: The take the best heuristic Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 75–95). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gneezy, U., & Potters, J. (1997). An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 631–645. doi:10.1162/003355397555217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gneezy, U., Kapteyn, A., & Potters, J. (2003). Evaluation periods and asset prices in a market experiment. The Journal of Finance, 58(2), 821–838. doi:10.1111/1540-6261.00547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haigh, M. S., & List, J. A. (2005). Do professional traders exhibit myopic loss aversion? An experimental analysis. The Journal of Finance, 60(1), 523–534. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00737.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haisley, E., Mostafa, R., & Loewenstein, G. (2008). Myopic risk-seeking: The impact of narrow decision bracketing on lottery play. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 37(1), 57–75. doi:10.1007/s11166-008-9041-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. J., Häubl, G., & Keinan, A. (2007). Aspects of endowment: A query theory of value construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 461–474. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klos, A. (2013). Myopic loss aversion: Potential causes of replication failures. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(5), 617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, T., & Weber, M. (2005). Myopic prospect theory vs. myopic loss aversion: How general is the phenomenon? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 56(1), 25–38. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2003.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, T., & Weber, M. (2008). Does commitment or feedback influence myopic loss aversion?: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 67(3-4), 810–819. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2006.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. (1994). Equate-to-differentiate theory: A coherent bi-choice model across certainty, uncertainty and risk. Kensington: University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S. (2003). The role of expected value illustrated in decision-making under risk: Single-play vs multiple-play. Journal of Risk Research, 6(2), 113–124. doi:10.1080/1366987032000078893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. (2004a). A behavioral choice model when computational ability matters. Applied Intelligence, 20(2), 147–163. doi:10.1023/B:APIN.0000013337.01711.c7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. (2004b). Equate-to-differentiate approach: An application in binary choice under uncertainty. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 12(3), 269.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S. (2005). Choice reversals across certainty, uncertainty and risk: The equate-to-differentiate interpretation. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 37(04), 427–433.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S., & Xie, X. (2006). A new look at the “Asian disease” problem: A choice between the best possible outcomes or between the worst possible outcomes? Thinking & Reasoning, 12(2), 129–143. doi:10.1080/13546780500145652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes, L. L. (1996). When time is of the essence: Averaging, aspiration, and the short run. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3), 179–189. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, E., & Koehler, D. J. (2010). Bracketing effects on risk tolerance: Generalizability and underlying mechanisms. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5), 339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortmann, A., Gigerenzer, G., Borges, B., & Goldstein, D. G. (2008). The recognition heuristic: A fast and frugal way to investment choice? In C. R. Plott & V. L. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics results. Oxford: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Pachur, T., Todd, P. M., Gigerenzer, G., Schooler, L. J., & Goldstein, D. G. (2011). The recognition heuristic: A review of theory and tests. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(6), 147. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, J. W. (2005). It is whether you win or lose: The importance of the overall probabilities of winning or losing in risky choice. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 30(1), 5–19. doi:10.1007/s11166-005-5831-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1991). Decision making over time and under uncertainty: A common approach. Management Science, 37(7), 770–786. doi:10.1287/mnsc.37.7.770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, L.-L., Dunn, J. C., Zhou, Y., & Li, S. (2015). The neural correlates of risky decision making across short and long runs. Scientific Reports, 5(1), 15831. doi:10.1038/srep15831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, D., Frederick, S., & Scholten, M. (2013). DRIFT: An analysis of outcome framing in intertemporal choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(2), 573–588. doi:10.1037/a0029177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. (1963). Risk and uncertainty-A fallacy of large numbers. Scientia, 98(612), 108–113.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Scholten, M., & Read, D. (2010). The psychology of intertemporal tradeoffs. Psychological Review, 117(3), 925–944. doi:10.1037/a0019619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutter, M. (2007). Are teams prone to myopic loss aversion? An experimental study on individual versus team investment behavior. Economics Letters, 97(2), 128–132. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2007.02.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323. doi:10.1007/BF00122574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. & Langer, T. (2003). Does binding of feedback influence myopic loss aversion? An experimental analysis. Retrieved from https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/mnhspaper/2766.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Wedell, D. H., & Bockenholt, U. (1994). Contemplating single versus multiple encounters of a risky prospect. The American Journal of Psychology, 107(4), 499–518. doi:10.2307/1422997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeisberger, S., Langer, T., & Weber, M. (2012). Why does myopia decrease the willingness to invest? Is It Myopic Loss Aversion or Myopic Loss Probability Aversion? Theory and Decision, 72(1), 35–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, L., Li, A. M., Zhang, L., Li, S., & Liang, Z. Y. (2019). Similarity in processes of risky choice and intertemporal choice: The case of certainty effect and immediacy effect. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 51(3), 337–352.
   Google Scholar