Preschoolers’ Thoughts on the Concept of Time

References

• Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: Revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(1), 79–86. doi:10.1177/0748175613513808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barger, M. M., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2017). Developmental systems of students’ personal theories about education. Educational Psychologist, 52(2), 63–83. doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1252264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., & Morran, J. (2002). Addressing children’s alternative frameworks of the Moon’s phases and eclipses. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 859–879. doi:10.1080/09500690110095276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohm, D. (1998). On creativity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Ferguson, L. E., Strømsø, H. I., & Anmarkrud, Ø. (2013). Justification beliefs and multiple-documents comprehension. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(3), 879–902. doi:10.1007/s10212-012-0145-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehl, M. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2001). Beliefs about academic knowledge. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 385–418. doi:10.1023/A:1011917914756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr, J. E., & Hofer, B. K. (2002). Personal epistemology and theory of mind: Deciphering young children’s beliefs about knowledge and knowing. New Ideas in Psychology, 20(2-3), 199–224. doi:10.1016/S0732-118X(02)00010-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, S., & Smith, C. (1993). On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 28(3), 235–251. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2803_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. W., & Elliot, R. G. (2004). Epistemological beliefs across cultures: Critique and analysis of beliefs structure studies. Educational Psychology, 24(2), 123–142.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J. A., & Pajares, F. (2010). Implicit theories of ability of grade 6 science students: Relation to epistemological beliefs and academic motivation and achievement in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 75–87. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, M. K., & Siew, N. M. (2015). The development and validation of a figural scientific creativity test for preschool pupils. Creative Education, 06(12), 1391–1402. doi:10.4236/ce.2015.612139
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A., & Samarapungavan, A. L. A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 141–167. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.587722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2005). Listening to and involving young children: A review of research and practice. Early Child Development and Care, 175(6), 489–505.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, K. M. T., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Jiao, Q. G. (2006). Prevalence of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. Evaluation & Research in Education, 19(2), 83–101. doi:10.2167/eri421.0
   Google Scholar
• Cremin, T., Glauert, E., Craft, A., Compton, A., & Stylianidou, F. (2015). Creative little scientists: Exploring pedagogical synergies between inquiry-based and creative approaches in Early Years science. Education 3-13, 43(4), 404–419. doi:10.1080/03004279.2015.1020655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, S. (2005). Intention and meaning in young children’s drawing. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 24(2), 115–125. doi:10.1111/j.1476-8070.2005.00432.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2003). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Czerneda, J. E. (2006). Science fiction & scientific literacy. The Science Teacher, 73(2), 38–42.
   Google Scholar
• Dietrich, A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1011–1026. doi:10.3758/bf03196731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2005). Children’s drawings: Experiences and expectations of school. International Journal of Equity and Innovation in Early Childhood, 3(2), 77–89.
   Google Scholar
• Einarsdottir, J., Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2009). Making meaning: Children’s perspectives expressed through drawings. Early Child Development and Care, 179(2), 217–232. doi:10.1080/03004430802666999
   Google Scholar
• Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science Education, 85(5), 554–567. doi:10.1002/sce.1023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder, A. D. (2002). Characterizing fifth grade students’ epistemological beliefs in science. In P. R. Pintrich (Ed.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 347–364). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Eshach, H., & Fried, M. (2005). Should science be taught in early childhood? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(3), 315–336. doi:10.1007/s10956-005-7198-9
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, L. E., & Bråten, I. (2013). Student profiles of knowledge and epistemic beliefs: Changes and relations to multiple-text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 25, 49–61. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, T. A. S., El-Hani, C. N., & Silva-Filho, W. J. (2016). Knowledge, belief, and science education: A contribution from the epistemology of testimony. Science & Education, 25(7-8), 775–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, L. (2004). Science as the center of a coherent, integrated early childhood curriculum. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 138–149. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2004.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, R. (1990). First principles organize attention to and learning about relevant data: Number and the animate-inanimate distinction as examples. Cognitive Science, 14(1), 79–106. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1401_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, K. R, and the Committee on Communications (2007). The importance of play in promoting healthy child development and maintaining strong parent-child bonds. PEDIATRICS, 119(1), 182–191. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-2697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, H., & Opper, S. (1969). Piaget’s theory of intellectual development: An introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gopnik, A. (2012). Scientific thinking in young children: Theoretical advances, empirical research, and policy implications. Science, 337(6102), 1623–1627. doi:10.1126/science.1223416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1997). Words, thoughts, and theories. Cambridge, MA US: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., Azevedo, R., & Torney-Purta, J. (2008). Modeling epistemic and ontological cognition: Philosophical perspectives and methodological directions. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 142–160. doi:10.1080/00461520802178458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., Sandoval, W. A., & Bråten, I. (2016). Handbook of epistemic cognition. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., Piasta, S. B., & Bowles, R. P. (2015). Exploring preschool children’s science content knowledge. Early Education and Development, 26(1), 125–146. doi:10.1080/10409289.2015.968240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadzigeorgiou, Y., Fokialis, P., & Kabouropoulou, M. (2012). Thinking about creativity in science education. Creative Education, 03(05), 603–611. doi:10.4236/ce.2012.35089
   Google Scholar
• Hao, Y., & Fleer, M. (2017). Collective interpretations of early science learning about earth and space: A cultural-historical study of family settings for scientific imagination. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 12(4), 354–373. doi:10.1080/1554480X.2017.1375411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, P. L., Pasquini, E. S., Duke, S., Asscher, J. J., & Pons, F. (2006). Germs and angels: The role of testimony in young children’s ontology. Developmental Science, 9(1), 76–96. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00465.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(4), 378–405. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 353–383. doi:10.1023/A:1011965830686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K. (2016). Epistemic cognition as a psychological construct: Advancements and challenges. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 19–38). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140. doi:10.3102/00346543067001088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, E., Hartzell, S. A., & Greene, M. T. (2009). Fostering creativity in the classroom: Effects of teachers’ epistemological beliefs, motivation, and goal orientation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(3), 192–208. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01314.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389–403. doi:10.1080/09500690110098912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, P., Peng, S., Chen, H., Tseng, L., & Hsu, L. (2017). The relative influences of domain knowledge and domain-general divergent thinking on scientific creativity and mathematical creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 25, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2017.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyytinena, H., Holmab, K., Tooma, A., Shavelsonc, R. J., & Lindblom-Ylännea, S. (2014). The complex relationship between students’ critical thinking and epistemological beliefs in the context of problem solving. Frontline Learning Research, 6, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. doi:10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2003). Data collection strategies in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 297–319). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. doi:10.1177/1558689806298224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kardash, C. M., & Howell, K. L. (2000). Effect of epistemological beliefs and topic-specific beliefs on undergraduates’ cognitive and strategic processing of dual-positional text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 524–535. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, F. C. (1983). On the emergence of semantic and conceptual distinctions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112(3), 357–385. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.112.3.357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., McDonald, S., & Wickman, P.-O. (2012). Science learning and epistemology. In K. Tobin, B. J. Fraser & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 281–291). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Kibbe, M. M., Kreisky, M., & Weisberg, D. S. (2018). Young children distinguish between different unrealistic fictional genres. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(2), 228–235. doi:10.1037/aca0000115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kienhues, D., Ferguson, L. E., & Stahl, E. (2016). Diverging information and epistemic change. In J. Greene, W. Sandoval, & I. Braten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 318–330). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H. (2008). Meta‐analyses of the relationship of creative achievement to both IQ and divergent thinking test scores. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 106–130. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01290.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2018). A role for reasoning in a dialogical approach to critical thinking. Topoi, 37(1), 121–128. doi:10.1007/s11245-016-9373-4
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., & Weinstock, M. (2002). What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter? In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 121–144). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15(3), 309–328. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(00)00030-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, J., & Holling, H. (2009). Exploring the nature of divergent thinking: A multilevel analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(2), 116–123. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2009.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.1086/ahr/68.3.700
   Google Scholar
• Lane, J. D., Wellman, H. M., & Evans, E. M. (2010). Children’s understanding of ordinary and extraordinary minds. Child Development, 81(5), 1475–1489. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01486.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laupa, M., & Turiel, E. (1993). Children's concepts of authority and social contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 191–197. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.1.191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & Quantity, 43(2), 265–275. doi:10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leman, P. J., & Duveen, G. (1996). Developmental differences in children’s understanding of epistemic authority. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(5), 683–702. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199609)26:5<683::AID-EJSP779>3.0.CO;2-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillard, A. S., & Kavanaugh, R. D. (2014). The contribution of symbolic skills to the development of an explicit theory of mind. Child Development, 85(4), 1535–1551. doi:10.1111/cdev.12227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippitz, W. (1944). The child’s understanding of time. Phenomenology and Pedagogy, 1(2), 172–180. doi:10.29173/pandp14873
   Google Scholar
• Lunn Brownlee, J., Ferguson, L. E., & Ryan, M. (2017). Changing teachers’ epistemic cognition: A new conceptual framework for epistemic reflexivity. Educational Psychologist, 52(4), 242–252. doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1333430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunn Brownlee, J., Scholes, L., Walker, S., & Johansson, E. (2016). Critical values education in the early years: Alignment of teachers’ personal epistemologies and practices for active citizenship. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 261–273. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madigan, S., Ladd, M., & Goldberg, S. (2003). A picture is worth a thousand words: Children’s representations of family as indicators of early attachment. Attachment & Human Development, 5(1), 19–37. doi:10.1080/1461673031000078652
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mason, L., & Scirica, F. (2006). Prediction of students’ argumentation skills about controversial topics by epistemological understanding. Learning and Instruction, 16(5), 492–509. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Boscolo, P., Tornatora, M., & Ronconi, L. (2013). Besides knowledge: A cross-sectional study on the relations between epistemic beliefs, achievement goals, self-beliefs, and achievement in science. Instructional Science, 41(1), 49–79. doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9210-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. (2001). Einstein, Picasso: Space, time, and the beauty that causes havoc. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, E., & Almon, J. (2009). Crisis in the kindergarten: Why children need to play in school. College Park, MD: Alliance for Childhood.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. A. (2007). Developmental research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 189–208). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Neber, H., & Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted students: The role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. High Ability Studies, 13(1), 59–74. doi:10.1080/13598130220132316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, E. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Poliquin, A. (2008). Role of epistemic beliefs and scientific argumentation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 30(15), 1977–1999. doi:10.1080/09500690701545919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2004). Enhancing the interpretation of significant findings: The role of mixed methods research. The Qualitative Report, 9(4), 770–792.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. F., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692–720. doi:10.1002/tea.10105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, D. D. (2001). Securing trustworthy data from an interview situation with young children: Six integrated interview strategies. Child Study Journal, 31(3), 137–156.
   Google Scholar
• Pascual-Leone, J. (1984). Attention, dialectic, and mental affort: Toward an organismic theory of life stages. In M. L. Commons, F. A. Richards & Ch. Armon (Eds.), Beyond formal operations (pp. 182–215). New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrini, A. D., Dupuis, D., & Smith, P. K. (2007). Play in evolution and development. Developmental Review, 27(2), 261–276. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2006.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1970b). Genetic epistemology. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1970a). Structuralism. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1969). The child’s conception of time (originally published 1946). New York, NY: Ballatine.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1964). Cognitive development in children: Development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176–186. doi:10.1002/tea.3660020306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1950). Introduction à l’Épistémologie Génétique. Tome II: La Pensé Physique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Ricco, R., & Rodriguez, P. (2006). The relation of personal epistemology to parenting style and goal orientation in college mothers. Social Psychology of Education, 9(2), 159–178. doi:10.1007/s11218-006-0001-9
   Google Scholar
• Richert, R. A., Shawber, A. B., Hoffman, R. E., & Taylor, M. (2009). Learning from fantasy and real characters in preschool and kindergarten. Journal of Cognition and Development, 10(1-2), 41–66. doi:10.1080/15248370902966594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ring, K. (2006). Supporting young children drawing: Developing a role. International Journal of Education through Art, 2(3), 195–209. doi:10.1386/etar.2.3.195_1
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25–41. doi:10.1080/14780887.2013.801543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royzman, E. B., Cassidy, K. W., & Baron, J. (2003). I know, you know”: Epistemic egocentrism in children and adults. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 38–65. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph, J. L. (2005). Epistemology for the masses: The origins of the “scientific method” in American schools. History of Education Quarterly, 45(3), 341–376. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5959.2005.tb00039.x
   Google Scholar
• Salmi, H., Thuneberg, H., & Vainikainen, M. (2017). Making the invisible observable by augmented reality in informal science education context. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(3), 253–268. doi:10.1080/21548455.2016.1254358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634–656. doi:10.1002/sce.20065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498–504. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharon, T., & Woolley, J. D. (2004). Do monsters dream? Young children’s understanding of the fantasy/reality distinction. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22(2), 293–310. doi:10.1348/026151004323044627
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. (2004). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smolleck, L., & Hershberger, V. (2011). Playing with science: An investigation of young children’s science conceptions and misconceptions. Current Issues in Education, 14(1), 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Spelke, E. S., Breinlinger, K., Macomber, J., & Jacobson, K. (1992). Origins of knowledge. Psychological Review, 99(4), 605–632. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, K. S. (2005). Marginalia: Dinosaurs as a cultural phenomenon. American Scientist, 93(3), 212–214. doi:10.1511/2005.53.3454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban, K. K. (2005). Assessing creativity: The test for creative thinking-drawing production (TCT-DP). International Education Journal, 6(2), 272–280.
   Google Scholar
• Urban, K. K., & Jellen, H. G. (1986). Assessing creative potential via drawing production: The Test for Creative Thinking - Drawing Production (TCT-DP). In A. J. Cropley, K. K. Urban, H. Wagner & W. Wieczerkowski (Eds.), Giftedness: A continuing worldwide challenge (pp.163–169). New York, NY: Trillium.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1994). Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science, 18(1), 123–183. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1801_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstock, M. P., Neuman, Y., & Glassner, A. (2006). Identification of informal reasoning fallacies as a function of epistemological level, grade level, and cognitive ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 327–341. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman, H. M. (1990). The child’s theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, E. (1986). Where pelicans kiss seals?. Psychology Today, 20(8), 25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Woolley, J. D., & McInnis, M. A. (2015). The development of children’s concepts of invisibility. Cognitive Development, 34, 63–75. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolley, J. D., & Wellman, H. M. (1990). Young children’s understanding of realities, nonrealities, and appearances. Child Development, 61(4), 946–961. doi:10.2307/1130867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (2007). Young children’s meaning-making through drawing and ‘telling’: Analogies to filmic textual features. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 32(4), 37–48. doi:10.1177/183693910703200408
   Google Scholar
• Wyver, S. R., & Spence, S. H. (1999). Play and divergent problem solving: Evidence supporting a reciprocal relationship. Early Education and Development, 10(4), 419–444. doi:10.1207/s15566935eed1004_1
   Google Scholar