A Research Agenda for Geospatial Technologies and Learning

References

• Albert, W. S., and R. G. Golledge. 1999. The use of spatial cognitive abilities in geographic information systems: The map overlay operation. Transactions in GIS 3 (1): 7–21.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T. R., and S. W. Bednarz. 2003. Lessons learned from reviewing research in GIS education. Journal of Geography 102 (6): 231–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, T. R., J. J. Kerski, N. T. Huynh, K. Viehrig, and S. W. Bednarz. 2012. A call for an agenda and center for GIS education research. Research in Geographic Education Online 2 (3): 254–288.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T. R., A. M. Palmer, and J. J. Kerski. 2009. A national survey to examine teacher professional development and implementation of desktop GIS. Journal of Geography 108 (4): 174–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, T. R., and S. H. White. 2003. The effects of G.I.S. on students’ attitudes, self-efficacy, and achievement in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Geography 102 (6): 243–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., M. Houle, S. Mark, E. Strauss, and E. Hoffman. 2010. Learning about urban ecology through the use of visualization and geospatial technologies. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 18 (2): 285–313.
   Google Scholar
• Bednarz, S. W., and R. S. Bednarz. 2008. Spatial thinking: The key to success in using geospatial technology in the social studies classroom. In Digital Geography: Geospatial Technologies in the Social Studies Classroom, ed. A. J. Milson and M. Alibrandi. pp. 249–270. Charlotte, North Carolina: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bednarz, S. W., S. Heffron, and N. T. Huynh, eds. 2013. A Road Map for 21st Century Geography Education: Geography Education Research (A report from the Geography Education Research Committee of the Road Map for 21st Century Geography Education Project). Washington, D.C.: Association of American Geographers.
   Google Scholar
• Bodzin, A. 2011. The implementation of a geospatial information technology (GIT)-supported land use change curriculum with urban middle school learners to promote spatial thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48 (3): 281–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodzin, A., T. Peffer, and V. Kulo. 2012. The efficacy of educative curriculum materials to support geospatial science pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 20 (4): 361–386.
   Google Scholar
• Bodzin, A., F. Qiong, V. Kulo, and T. Peffer. Forthcoming. Examining the effect of enactment of a geospatial curriculum on students’ geospatial thinking and reasoning. Journal of Science Education and Technology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conover, S., R. Kermish-Allen, and R. Snyder. 2014. Communities for Rural Education, Stewardship and Technology Program (CREST): A rural model of teacher professional development. In Teaching Science and Investigating Environmental Issues with Geospatial Technology: Designing Effective Professional Development for Teachers, ed. J. G. MaKinster, N. M. Trautmann, and M. Barnett, pp. 139–152. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Coulter, B. 2014. Moving out of flatland: Toward effective practice in geospatial inquiry. In Teaching Science and Investigating Environmental Issues with Geospatial Technology: Designing Effective Professional Development for Teachers. ed. J. G. MaKinster, N. M. Trautmann, and M. Barnett, pp. 398–423. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., and J. S. Krajcik. 2005. Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher 34 (3): 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., and K. Varma. 2008. Supporting teachers in productive adaptation. In Designing Coherent Science Education: Implications for Curriculum, Instruction, and Policy, ed. Y. Kali, M. Linn, and J. E. Roseman, pp. 94–122. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demirci, A. 2008. Evaluating the implementation and effectiveness of GIS-based application in secondary school geography lessons. American Journal of Applied Sciences 5 (3): 169–178.
   Google Scholar
• DiBiase, D., M. DeMers, A. B. Johnson, K. Kemp, B. P. Plewe, and E. A. Wentz. 2006. The Geographic Information Science and Technology Body of Knowledge. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Geographers.
   Google Scholar
• Doering, A., S. Koseoglug, C. Scharberg, J. Henrickson, and D. Lanegran. Forthcoming. Technology integration in K–12 geography education using TPACK as a conceptual model. Journal of Geography.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doering, A., and G. Veletsianos. 2007. An investigation of the use of real-time, authentic geospatial data in the K–12 classroom. Journal of Geography 106 (6): 217–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DOLETA. 2010. Geospatial technology competency model. http://www.careeronestop.org/competencymodel/pyramid.aspx?GEO=Y (accessed May 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Ebenezer, J., N. K. Osman, and D. L. Ebenezer. 2011. Engaging students in environmental research projects: Perceptions of fluency with innovative technologies and levels of scientific inquiry abilities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48 (1): 94–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogleman, J., K. L. McNeill, and J. Krajcik. 2011. Examining the effect of teachers’ adaptations of a middle school science inquiry-oriented curriculum unit on student learning. Journal for Research in Science Teaching 48 (2): 149–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, D., and M. Alibrandi. 2013. Integrating GIS in the middle school curriculum: Impacts on diverse students’ standardized test scores. Journal of Geography 112 (2): 68–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golledge R. G., M. Marsh, and S. E. Battersby. 2008. A conceptual framework for facilitating spatial thinking. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 98 (2): 285–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F., and D. G. Janelle. 2010. Toward critical spatial thinking in the social sciences and humanities. GeoJournal 75 (1): 3–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hagevik, R. 2011. Five steps to success: Implementing geospatial technologies in the science classroom. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction 5 (1): 34–53.
   Google Scholar
• Hall-Wallace, M. K., and C. M. McAuliffe. 2002. Design, implementation, and evaluation of GIS-based learning materials in an introductory geoscience course. Journal of Geoscience Education 50 (1): 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, J., and D. Sinton. 2011. Sequencing spatial concepts in problem-based GIS instruction. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 21 (): 253–259.
   Google Scholar
• Huynh, N. 2009. The role of geospatial thinking and geographic skills in effective problem solving with GIS: K–16 education. Ph.D. diss., Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Huynh, N., and B. Sharpe. 2013. An assessment instrument to measure geospatial thinking expertise. Journal of Geography 112 (1): 3–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huynh, N., M. Solem, and S. Bednarz. Forthcoming. A roadmap for learning progressions research in geography. Journal of Geography.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Education Sciences and National Science Foundation. 2013. Common guidelines for education research and development. http://ies.ed.gov/pdf/CommonGuidelines.pdf (accessed May 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Keenan, K., and D. Fontaine. 2012. Listening to our students: Understanding how they learn research methods in geography. Journal of Geography 111 (6): 224–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerski, J. J. 2003. The implementation and effectiveness of geographic information systems technology and methods in secondary education. Journal of Geography 10 (3): 128–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., and R. S. Bednarz. 2013. Effects of a GIS course on self-assessment of spatial habits of mind (SHOM). Journal of Geography 122 (4): 165–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler, M., and P. Mishra. 2009. What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 9 (1): 60–70.
   Google Scholar
• Kubitskey, B., H. Johnson, K. Mawyer, B. Fishman, and D. Edelson. 2014. Curriculum aligned professional development for geospatial education. In Teaching Science and Investigating Environmental Issues with Geospatial Technology: Designing Effective Professional Development for Teachers, ed. J. G. MaKinster, N. M. Trautmann, and M. Barnett, pp. 153–172. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kulo, V., and A. Bodzin 2013. The impact of a geospatial technology-supported energy curriculum on middle school students’ science achievement. Journal of Science Education and Technology 22 (1):25–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. S., M. C. Linn, K. Varma, and O. L. Liu. 2010. How do technology-enhanced inquiry science units impact classroom learning? Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (1): 71–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., and R. S. Bednarz. 2009. Effect of GIS learning on spatial thinking. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 33 (2): 183–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., and R. S. Bednarz. 2012. Components of spatial thinking: Evidence from a spatial thinking ability test. Journal of Geography 111 (1): 5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liben, L. S., L. J. Myers, and K. A. Kastens. 2008. Locating oneself on a map in relation to personal qualities and map characteristics. In Spatial Cognition VI: Learning, Reasoning and Talking about Space, ed. C. Freksa, N. S. Newcombe, P. Gärdenfors, and S. Wölfl, pp. 171–187. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, S. J., C. Pyke, and B. H. Grafton. 2012. A retrospective view of a study of middle school science curriculum materials: Implementation, scale-up, and sustainability in a changing policy environment. Journal for Research in Science Teaching 49 (3): 305–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MaKinster, J. G., N. M. Trautmann, and M. Barnett. 2014. Teaching Science and Investigating Environmental Issues with Geospatial Technology: Designing Effective Professional Development for Teachers. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, M. J., R. G. Golledge, and S. E. Battersby. 2009. Geospatial concept understanding and recognition in G6–College Students: A preliminary argument for minimal GIS. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 97 (4): 696–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClurg, P. A., and A. Buss. 2007. Professional development: Teachers use of GIS to enhance student learning. Journal of Geography 106 (2): 79–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milson, A. J., and B. D. Earle. 2007. Internet-based GIS in an inductive learning environment: A case study of ninth-grade geography students. Journal of Geography 106 (6): 227–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., and M. J. Koehler. 2006. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record 108 (6): 1017–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, S., D. Haviland, A. Whitmer, and J. Brady. 2014. Coastlines: Commitment, comfort, competence, empowerment, and relevance in professional development. In Teaching Science and Investigating Environmental Issues with Geospatial Technology: Designing Effective Professional Development for Teachers, ed. J. G. MaKinster, N. M. Trautmann, and G. M. Barnett, pp. 131–158. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mowbray, C. T., M. C. Holter, G. B. Teague, and D. Bybee. 2003. Fidelity criteria: Development, measurement, and validation. American Journal of Evaluation 24 (3): 315–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers. 2010. Common Core State Standards. Washington, D.C.:
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2002. Scientific Research in Education. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2006. Learning to Think Spatially. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2007. Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K–8. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielson, C. P., A. Oberle, and R. Sugumaran. 2011. Implementing a high school level geospatial technologies and spatial thinking course. Journal of Geography 110 (2): 60–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, M. W., K. Reeve, and D. Page. 2003. Integrating geographic information systems into the secondary curricula. Journal of Geography 102 (6): 275–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R.. and B. J. Fishman. 2012. Large-scale science education intervention research we can use. Journal for Research in Science Teaching 49 (3): 281–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., B. J. Fishman, B. H. Cheng, and N. Sabelli. 2011. Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher 40 (7): 331–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., B. J. Fishman, R. Yamaguchi, and L. P. Gallagher. 2007. What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal 44 (4): 921–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R.. and B. Means. 2004. Implementation variation and fidelity in an inquiry science program: An analysis of GLOBE data reporting patterns. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (3): 294–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, N., E. Hazelton, J. Erickson, and W. Allan. 2010. Place-based education and geographic information systems: Enhancing the spatial awareness of middle school students in Maine. Journal of Geography 109 (5): 213–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A., R. J. Shavelson, L. Hamilton, and S. Klein. 2002. On the evaluation of systemic science education reform: Searching for instructional sensitivity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (5): 369–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, E. 2006. Using geographic information system (GIS) to improve fourth graders’ geographic content knowledge and map skills. Journal of Geography 105 (3): 109–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinton, D. S. 2011. Spatial thinking. In 21st Century Geography: A Reference Handbook. ed. J. Stoltman. pp. 733–744. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sinton, D. S., B. Kolvoord, P. Gersmehl, S. Bednarz, and D. Uttal. 2013. The People's Guide to Spatial Thinking. Washington, D.C.: National Council for Geographic Education.
   Google Scholar
• Songer, L. 2010. Using web-based GIS in human geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 34 (3): 401–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stylinski, C. D., and C. Doty. 2014. The inquiring with GIS (iGIS) project: Helping teachers create and lead local GIS-based investigations. In Teaching Science and Investigating Environmental Issues with Geospatial Technology: Designing Effective Professional Development for Teachers, ed. J. G. MaKinster, N. M. Trautmann, and M. Barnett, pp. 119–138. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sui, D. 1995. A pedagogic framework to link GIS to the intellectual core of geography. Journal of Geography 94 (6): 578–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarr, J. E., R. Reys, B. Reys, O. Chavez, J. Shih, and S. Osterlind. 2008. The impact of middle grades mathematics curricula and the classroom learning environment on student achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 39 (3): 247–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trautmann, N. M., and J. G. MaKinster. 2010. Flexibly adaptive professional development in support of teaching science with geospatial technology. Journal of Science Teacher Education 21 (3):351–370.
   Google Scholar
• Trautmann, N. M., and J. G. MaKinster. 2014. Meeting teachers where they are and helping them achieve their geospatial goals. In Teaching Science and Investigating Environmental Issues with Geospatial Technology: Designing Effective Professional Development for Teachers, ed. J. G. MaKinster, N. M. Trautmann, and M. Barnett, pp. 66–85. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Uttal, D. H. 2000. Seeing the big picture: Map use and the development of spatial cognition. Geospatial technology competency model Geospatial technology competency model. Developmental Science 3 (3): 247–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uttal, D. H. 2005. Spatial symbols and spatial thought: Cross-cultural, developmental, and historical perspectives on the relation between map use and spatial cognition. In Symbol Use and Symbolic Representation: Developmental and Comparative Perspectives, ed. L. Namy, pp. 3–23. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wiegand, P. 2003. School students’ understanding of choropleth maps: Evidence from collaborative mapmaking using GIS. Journal of Geography 102 (6): 234–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilder, A., J. D. Brinkerhoff, and T. M. Higgins. 2003. Geographic information technologies +project-based science: A contextualized professional development approach. Journal of Geography 102 (6): 255–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar