701
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Potential Contribution of Geography Curriculum to Scientific Literacy

, , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 185-196 | Received 02 Feb 2017, Accepted 15 Apr 2019, Published online: 23 May 2019

References

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS 1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press. Accessed October 7, 2014. http://www.project2061.org/publications/bsl/online/index.php.
  • Atkinson, R., and J. Flint. 2004. Snowball sampling. In The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods, ed. M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, and T. F. Liao. Thousand Oaks, PA: Sage Publications, Inc. http://methods.sagepub.com/Reference/the-sage-encyclopedia-of-social-science-research-methods.
  • Bednarz, S. W., G. Acheson, and R. S. Bednarz. 2006. Maps and map learning in social studies. Social Education 70 (7):398–404.
  • Bednarz, S. W., S. G. Heffron, and M. Solem. 2014. Geography standards in the United States: Past influences and future prospects. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 23 (1):79–89. doi: 10.1080/10382046.2013.858455.
  • Boujaoude, S. 2002. Balance of scientific literacy themes in science curricula: The case of Lebanon. International Journal of Science Education 24 (2):139–156. doi: 10.1080/09500690110066494.
  • Brysch, C. P. 2014. Status of geography education in the United States: A report for the National Geographic Society Education Foundation. Accessed October 17, 2017. http://gato-docs.its.txstate.edu/jcr:42d98ff7-42d2-418c-b14a-55f288f9d99c/State_of_Geography_Report.pdf.
  • Butt, G., and D. Lambert. 2014. International perspectives on the future of geography education: An analysis of national curriculum and standards. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 23 (1):1–12. doi: 10.1080/10382046.2013.858402.
  • Bybee, R., and B. McCrae. 2011. Scientific literacy and student attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education 33 (1):7–26. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.518644.
  • Catling, S. 2011. Children’s geographies in the primary school. In Geography, education, and the future, ed. G. Butt, 15–29. London: Continuum International.
  • Cavanagh, S. 1997. Content analysis: Concepts, methods and applications. Nurse Researcher 4 (3):5–16. doi: 10.7748/nr.4.3.5.s2.
  • Chen, B. 2014. Technological ethics issues: Multiple perspectives. Beijing, China: China Social Sciences Press.
  • Chen, C., and P. Lin. 2012. Comprehensive reading of the national middle school geography curriculum standards. Beijing, China: Higher Education Press.
  • Chiappetta, E., D. Fillman, and G. Sethna. 1991. A method to quantify major themes of scientific literacy in science textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28 (8):713–725. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660280808.
  • Chiappetta, E., G. Sethna, and D. Fillman. 1993. Do middle school life science textbooks provide a balance of scientific literacy themes? Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30 (7):787–797. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660300714.
  • Claval, P. 2015. A history of geographical thoughts. Translated by S. Zheng. Beijing, China: Peking University Press.
  • DeBoer, G. E. 2000. Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (6):582–601. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L.
  • Dillon, J. 2009. On scientific literacy and curriculum reform. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 4 (3):201–213.
  • Duschl, R. A., and J. Osborne. 2002. Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education 38 (1):39–72. doi: 10.1080/03057260208560187.
  • Eidietis, L., and S. Rutherford. 2009. Sailing toward understanding surface currents: A science and geography integration activity for upper-elementary students. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas 46 (3):5–14. doi: 10.3200/SATS.46.3.5-14.
  • Ellis, J. 2006. Researching children’s experience hermeneutically and holistically. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research 52 (3):111–126.
  • Florentina, M., and M. Barbu. 2015. An inter-disciplinary approach in teaching geography, chemistry, and environmental education. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences 180:660–665. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.175.
  • Gillette, B. 2015. The nature and process of science and applications to geography education: A US perspective. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 24 (1):6–12. doi: 10.1080/10382046.2014.967112.
  • Grubbs, M. E., and S. Grubbs. 2015. Beyond science and math: Integrating geography education. Technology and Engineering Teacher 74 (4):17–21.
  • Heffron, S. G. 2012. GFL2! The updated geography for life: National geography standards, second edition. The Geography Teacher 9 (2):43–48. doi: 10.1080/19338341.2012.679889.
  • Holbrook, J., and M. Rannikmae. 2009. The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 4 (3):275–288.
  • Hsieh, H.-F., and S. E. Shannon. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15 (9):1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
  • International Geographical Union Commission on Geographical Education (IGU-CGE). 2015. International declaration on research in geography education. Accessed March 17, 2017. http://www.igu-cge.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/International-Declaration-on-Research-in-Geography-Education-FULL-DOCUMENT-JUNE-2015.pdf.
  • Kvale, S. 1996. Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Lambert, D., and J. Hopkin. 2014. A possibilist analysis of the geography national curriculum in England. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 23 (1):64–78. doi: 10.1080/10382046.2013.858446.
  • Laugksch, R. C. 2000. Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education 84 (1):71–94. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1<71::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-C.
  • Lee, Y. J., M. Kim, Q. Jin, H. G. Yoon, and K. Matsubara. 2016. East-Asian primary science curricula: An overview using revised Bloom’s taxonomy. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  • Ma, G. 2007. Environment education. Beijing, China: Science Press.
  • McEneaney, E. H. 2003. The worldwide cachet of scientific literacy. Comparative Education Review 47 (2):217–237.
  • Merriam, S. B. 1998. Designing the study and selecting a sample. In Qualitative research and case study application in education, ed. S. B. Merriam, 44–67. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Ministry of Education of People’s Republic of China. 2011. The national geography curriculum standard for middle school. Beijing, China: Beijing Normal University Press.
  • Morse, J. M. 2004. Purposive sampling. In The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods, ed. M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, and T. F. Liao. Thousand Oaks, PA: Sage Publications, Inc. http://methods.sagepub.com/Reference/the-sage-encyclopedia-of-social-science-research-methods.
  • National Research Council (NRC). 1996. National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Accessed October 9, 2014. https://www.csun.edu/science/ref/curriculum/reforms/nses/nsescomplete.pdf.
  • National Research Council (NRC). 2011. Successful K–12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Oldakowski, R., and A. Johnson. 2018. Combining geography, math and science to teach climate change and sea level rise. Journal of Geography 117 (1):17–28. doi: 10.1080/00221341.2017.1336249.
  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2017. PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematic, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving. Paris: OECD. Accessed November 13, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-3-en.
  • Oyana, T. J., S. J. Garcia, J. A. Haegele, T. L. Hawthorne, J. Morgan, and N. J. Young. 2015. Nurturing diversity in STEM fields through geography: The past, the present, and the future. Journal of STEM Education 16 (2):20–29.
  • Sandoval, W. A., and B. J. Reiser. 2004. Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education 88 (3):345–372. doi: 10.1002/sce.10130.
  • Solem, M., and S. Tani. 2017. Geography education, primary and secondary: International perspectives. In International encyclopedia of geography: People, the earth, environment, and technology, ed. D. Richardson, N. Castree, M. F. Goodchild, A. Kobayashi, W. Liu, and R. A. Marston. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg1014.
  • Stuckelberger, C. 2009. Why and for whom should we care? Environmental ethics, responsibility, and climate. Fudan Journal (Social Sciences) (1):68–79.
  • Yang, G. 2013. Introduction of environmental ethics. Beijing, China: Tsinghua University Press.
  • Yager, R. 2000. A vision for what science education should be like for the first 25 years of a new millennium. School Science and Mathematics 100 (6):327–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17327.x.
  • Zembal-Saul, C. 2009. Learning to teach elementary school science as argument. Science Education 93 (4):687–719. doi: 10.1002/sce.20325.
  • Zeng, J. 2004. Environmental ethics education. Beijing, China: People’s Press.
  • Zimmerman, C. 2005. The development of scientific reasoning skills: What psychologists contribute to an understanding of elementary science learning. Accessed June 11, 2017. https://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_080105.pdf.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.