432
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Teacher Attitudes toward Alternative Professional Development in Geography

Pages 55-62 | Received 26 Nov 2018, Accepted 16 Dec 2019, Published online: 13 Jan 2020

References

  • Barnett, M. 2002. Issues and trends concerning electronic networking technologies for teacher professional development: A critical review of the literature. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  • Bates, M. S., L. Phalen, and C. Moran. 2016. Online professional development: A primer. Phi Delta Kappan 97 (5):70–3. doi: 10.1177/0031721716629662.
  • Bednarz, S., J. Stoltman, and J. Lee. 2004. Preparing geography teachers in the United States. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 13 (2):176–83. doi: 10.1080/09669580408668511.
  • Berger, H., B.-S. Eylon, and E. Bagno. 2008. Professional development of physics teachers in an evidence-based blended learning program. Journal of Science Education and Technology 17 (4):399–409. doi: 10.1007/s10956-008-9109-3.
  • Bisasutti, M. 2017. A comparative analysis of forums and wikis as tools for online collaborative learning. Computers & Education 111 (2017):158–71.
  • Boehm, R. G., J. Brierley, and M. Sharma. 1994. The bête noir of geographic education: Teacher training programs. In A decade of reform in geographic education: Inventory and Prospect, eds. R. S. Bednarz and J. F. Petersen, 89–98. Indiana, PA: National Council for Geographic Education.
  • Boehm, R. G., C. P. Brysch, A. Mohan, and A. Backler. 2012. A new pathway: Video- based professional development in geography. Journal of Geography 111 (2):41–53. doi: 10.1080/00221341.2011.584068.
  • Borko, H. 2004. Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher 33 (8):3–15. doi: 10.3102/0013189X033008003.
  • Borko, H., J. Whitcomb, and D. Liston. 2009. Wicked problems and other thoughts on issues of technology and teacher learning. Journal of Teacher Education 60 (1):3–7. doi: 10.1177/0022487108328488.
  • Brysch, C. P., and R. G. Boehm. 2013. The Learning Cluster Method (LCM) as a means of extending the capabilities of an online professional development system in geography. Papers in Applied Geography 36:264–70.
  • Brysch, C. P., and R. G. Boehm. 2014. Online professional development in geography: The Learning Cluster Method and teacher leadership. European Journal of Geography 5 (1):62–9.
  • Clary, R. M., J. A. Dunne, A. D. Elder, S. Saebo, D. J. Beard, C. L. Wax, J. Winter, and D. L. Tucker. 2017. Optimizing online content instruction for effective hybrid teacher professional development programs. Journal of Science Teacher Education 28 (6):507–21. doi: 10.1080/1046560X.2017.1379859.
  • Creswell, J. W. 2009. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. 2010. Teacher education and the American future. Journal of Teacher Education 61 (1–2):35–47. doi: 10.1177/0022487109348024.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., M. E. Hyler, and M. Gardner. 2017. Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
  • Davis, M. R. 2011. Teacher training takes a hybrid turn. Education Week 31 (9): S4–S7.
  • Davis, S. 2017. Drama and arts-based professional learning: Exploring face-to-face, online and transmedia models. Teaching Education 28 (4):333–48. doi: 10.1080/10476210.2017.1296830.
  • de Mesquita, P. B., R. F. Dean, and B. J. Young. 2010. Making sure what you see is what you get: Digital video technology and the preparation of teachers of elementary science. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 10 (3):275–93.
  • Dede, C., D. Jass-Ketelhut, P. Whitehouse, L. Breit, and E. M. McCloskey. 2009. A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education 60 (1):8–19. doi: 10.1177/0022487108327554.
  • Dixon, F. A., N. Yssel, J. M. McConnell, and T. Hardin. 2014. Differentiated instruction, professional development, and teacher efficacy. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 37 (2):111–27. doi: 10.1177/0162353214529042.
  • Donavant, B. W. 2009. The new, modern practice of adult education. Adult Education Quarterly 59 (3):227–45. doi: 10.1177/0741713609331546.
  • Elliott, J. 2017. The evolution from traditional to online professional development: A review. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education 33 (3):114–25. doi: 10.1080/21532974.2017.1305304.
  • Frazier, C. A., and R. G. Boehm. 2012. Using technology for geography teacher education: Web-based professional development. Review of International Geographical Education Online 2 (1):78–94.
  • Garrison, D. R., and H. Kanuka. 2004. Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 7 (2):95–105. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001.
  • George, P. S. 2005. A rationale for differentiating instruction in the regular classroom. Theory into Practice 44 (3):185–93. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4403_2.
  • Gibbs, G. R. 2007. Analyzing qualitative data. In The Sage qualitative kit, ed. U. Flick. London: Sage.
  • Gray, J., J. Corley, and B. P. Eddy. 2016. An experience report assessing a professional development MOOC for CS principles. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education. SIGCSE '16. ACM, New York, NY, 455–460.
  • Gregg, M., and G. Sr Leinhardt. 1994. Mapping out geography: An example of epistemology and education. Review of Educational Research 64 (2):311–61. doi: 10.3102/00346543064002311.
  • Guldberg, K. 2008. Adult learners and professional development: Peer-to-peer learning in a networked community. International Journal of Lifelong Education 27 (1):35–49. doi: 10.1080/02601370701803591.
  • Heffron, S. G., and R. M. Downs. (Eds.). 2012. Geography for life: National geography standards, Second edition. Washington, DC: National Council for Geographic Education.
  • Kenreich, T. W. 2004. Beliefs, classroom practices, and professional development activities of teacher consultants. Journal of Geography 103 (4):153–60. doi: 10.1080/00221340408978593.
  • Kirkpatrick, D. 2006. Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Ko, S., and S. Rossen. 2001. Teaching online: A practical guide. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Kurz, T. L., I. Batarelo, and J. A. Middleton. 2009. Examining elementary preservice teachers’ perspectives concerning curriculum themes for video case construction. Educational Technology Research and Development 57 (4):461–85. doi: 10.1007/s11423-009-9110-4.
  • Lawless, K. A., and J. W. Pellegrino. 2007. Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research 77 (4):575–614. doi: 10.3102/0034654307309921.
  • Lieberman, A., and D. P. Mace. 2010. Making practice public: Teacher learning in the 21st century. Journal of Teacher Education 61 (1–2):77–88. doi: 10.1177/0022487109347319.
  • Lutrick, E., and S. Szabo. 2012. Instructional leaders’ beliefs about effective professional development. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin 78 (3):6–12.
  • Macia, M., and I. Garcia. 2016. Informal online communities as a source of teacher professional development: A review. Teaching and Teacher Education 55:291–307.
  • Magiera, J. 2012. Blended PD: The best of both worlds. Education Week 32 (1):6.
  • Major, L., and S. Watson. 2018. Using video to support in-service teacher professional development: The state of the field, limitations and possibilities. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 27 (1):49–68. doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2017.1361469.
  • Means, B., Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, M. Bakia, and K. Jones. 2010. Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development Policy and Program Studies Service. Last accessed 20 November 2018. http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf.
  • Mentzer, G. A., J. R. Cryan, and B. Teclehaimanot. 2007. Two peas in a pod? A comparison of face-to-face and web-based classrooms. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 15 (2):233–46.
  • Merriam, S. B. 2009. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Mitchell, J. T. 2018. Pre-service teachers learn to teach geography: A suggested course model. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 42 (2):238–60. doi: 10.1080/03098265.2017.1398719.
  • Moe, C. E., and S. A. Rye. 2011. Blended learning: Communication, locations and real work-life practices. Educational Media International 48 (3):165–78. doi: 10.1080/09523987.2011.607320.
  • National Geographic Society (NGS). 2018. Educator certification (beta). Accessed June 26, 2018. https://www.nationalgeographic.org/education/programs/educator-certification/beta.
  • Owston, R. D., M. Sinclair, and H. Wideman. 2008. Blended learning for professional development: An evaluation of a program for middle school mathematics and science teachers. Teachers College Record 110 (5):1033–64.
  • Parsons, S. A., A. C. Hutchison, L. A. Hall, A. W. Parsons, S. T. Ives, and A. B. Leggett. 2019. U.S. teachers’ perceptions of online professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education 82:33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.006.
  • Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Reitano, P., and N. Green. 2012. Mapping expertise in social science teaching: The professional development of a beginning teacher. Critical and Reflective Practice in Education 3:4–13.
  • Rutherford, D., and C. Lovorn. 2018. Research-based program development: Refining the service model for a geographic alliance. Journal of Geography 117 (2):88–98. doi: 10.1080/00221341.2017.1301984.
  • Sawchuk, S. 2009. Teacher training goes in virtual directions. Technology Counts 28 (26):22–4.
  • Seago, N., K. Koellner, and J. Jacobs. 2018. Video in the middle: Purposeful design of video-based mathematics professional development. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 18 (1):29–49.
  • Sherin, M., and E. van Es. 2005. Using video to support teachers’ ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 13 (3):475–91.
  • Tondeur, J., A. Forkosh-Baruch, S. Prestridge, P. Albion, and S. Edirisinghe. 2016. Responding to challenges in teacher professional development for ICT integration in education. Educational Technology & Society 19 (3):110–20.
  • Webb, D. C., H. Nickerson, and J. B. Bush. 2017. A comparative analysis of online and face-to-face professional development models for CS education. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Seattle, WA, 621–626. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. doi: 10.1145/3017680.3017784.
  • Zhao, Y. 2010. Preparing globally competent teachers: A new imperative for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education 61 (5):422–31. doi: 10.1177/0022487110375802.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.