Criteria for Identifying a Refereed Journal

References

• Adair, R. K. “Anonymous Refereeing.” Physics Today, 34 (June 1981), 13, 15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Chemical Society. Handbook for Authors. Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. 2d ed. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, P. J., and R. K. Goldstein. “Criteria of Journal Quality.” Journal of Research Communication Studies, 3 (1981), 99–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S. “Research in Scientific Journals: Implications for Editors and Authors.” Journal of Forecasting, 1 (1982), 83–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, D. B., and K. O'Doyle, Jr.. Education/Psychology Journals: A Scholar's Guide. Metuchen: Scarecrow Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Balachandran, S. Directory of Publishing Sources: The Researcher's Guide to Journals in Engineering and Technology. New York: Wiley, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Benedek, E. P. “Editorial Practices of Psychiatric and Related Journals: Implications for Women.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 133 (January 1976), 89–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, H. R. “Report from the Editor.” Human Organization, 39 (Winter 1980), 366–69.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, J. M. “Editorial Policies and Practices among Leading Journals in Four Scientific Fields.” Sociological Quarterly, 19 (Winter 1978), 68–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohrnstedt, G. W. “Comment.” The American Sociologist, 14 (November 1979), 243–44.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, D. D., R. Perloff, and J. Jacoby. “Improving Manuscript Evaluation Procedures.” American Psychologist, 27 (March 1972), 221–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brackbill, Y., and F. Korten. “Journal Reviewing Practices: Authors' and APA Members' Suggestions for Revision.” American Psychologist, 25 (October 1970), 937–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabell, D. W. E. (ed.). Cabell's Directory of Publishing Opportunities in Business, Administration, and Economics. Beaumont: Cabell Publishing Co., 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Camp, W. L., and B. L. Schwark. Guide to Periodicals in Education and its Academic Disciplines. 2d ed. Metuchen: Scarecrow Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, J. M. “Normative Criteria for Scientific Publication.” The American Sociologist, 5 (August 1970), 262–65.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, M. J., R. J. Hartnett, and L. L. Baird. Assessing Dimensions of Quality in Doctoral Education. Princeton: Educational Testing Service, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, R. K., and I. Weinstock. “Publication Policies of Major Business Journals.” Southern Journal of Business, 3 (January 1968), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Commission on Academic Tenure in Higher Education. Faculty Tenure. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Commoner, B. “Peering at Peer Review.” Hospital Practice, 13 (November 1978), 25, 29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBakey, L. The Scientific Journal: Editorial Policies and Practices. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby Co., 1976.
   Google Scholar
• DeBakey, L., and S. DeBakey. “Impartial, Signed Reviews.” The New England Journal of Medicine, 294 (1976), 564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Körösy, F. “Discussion.” In Scientific Information Transfer: The Editor's Role, edited by M. Balaban, pp. 239–40. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Directory of Publishing Opportunities in Journals and Periodicals. 4th ed. Chicago: Marquis Academic Media, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Fashing, J. “Replies to Scimecca.” The American Sociologist, 11 (November 1976), 205–7.
   Google Scholar
• Frantz, T. T. “Criteria for Publishable Manuscripts.” Personnel and Guidance Journal, 47 (December 1968), 384–86.
   Google Scholar
• Freese, L. “On Changing Some Role Relationships in the Editorial Review Process” and “Rejoinder.” The American Sociologist, 14 (November 1979), 231–38, 244–45.
   Google Scholar
• Garvey, W. D., N. Lin, and C. E. Nelson. “Communication in the Physical and Social Sciences.” Science, 170 (December 1970), 1166–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazda, G. M. et al. “Continuation with a New Phase.” Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama, and Sociometry, 34 (1981), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, M. W., and G. C. Wright. “Political Scientists' Evaluations of Sixty-Three Journals.” PS, 8 (Summer 1975), 254–56.
   Google Scholar
• Glen, J. W. “Report of Discussion Group: Refereeing Policies.” Journal of Research Communication Studies, 3 (1981–82), 395–99.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, N. D. “American Sociologists' Evaluations of Sixty-Three Journals. The American Sociologist, 6 (November 1971), 298–303.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, N. D. “The Journal Article Review Process: Some Proposals for Change.” The American Sociologist, 11 (August 1976), 179–85.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, M. D. “The Role of Referees in Scientific Communication.” In The Psychology of Written Communication, edited by J. Hartley, pp. 263–75. London: Kogan Page, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Goudsmit, S. A. “Reviewer and Author Anonymity.” Physics Today, 20 (January 1967), 12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gove, W. R. “The Review Process and Its Consequences in the Major Sociology Journals.” Contemporary Sociology, 8 (November 1979), 799–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G. “An Editorial.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33 (January 1976), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hamm, W., and T. Vocino. “Evaluation of 41 Journals by ASPA Members.” The Bureaucrat, 5 (January 1977), 439–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R. G., L. S. Ritter, and I. Walter. “What Economists Think of Their Journals.” Journal of Political Economy, 81 (July/August 1973), 1017–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert, W. “Blind Reviewing, Hotly Debated, Taking Hold in Humanities Journals.” Humanities Report, 2 (April 1980), 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, E. L. “Effects of the Review Process.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 18 (September 1975), 196–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, H. M. “Comment.” The American Sociologist, 14 (November 1979), 242–43.
   Google Scholar
• Huth, E. J. “Does Peer Review of Journal Manuscripts Improve the Quality of Scholarly Journals?” In 1979 SSP Proceedings, pp. 59–60. Washington, D.C.: Society for Scholarly Publishing, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Ingelfinger, F. J. “Peer Review in Biomedical Publication.” The American Journal of Medicine, 56 (May 1974), 686–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingelfinger, F. J. “Charity and Peer Review in Publication.” The New England Journal of Medicine, 293 (December 1975), 1371–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauch, L. R., and W. F. Glueck. “Evaluation of University Professors' Research Performance.” Management Science, 22 (September 1975), 66–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R. “Rights, Wrongs and Referees.” New Scientist, 61 (March 1974), 758–59.
   Google Scholar
• Juhasz, S. et al. “Acceptance and Rejection of Manuscripts.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 18 (September 1975), 177–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, B., and B. G. Richards. Magazines for Libraries. 3d ed. New York: Bowker, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Kertes, S. “Discussion.” In Scientific Information Transfer: The Editor's Role, edited by M. Balaban, pp. 238–39. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, W. H. “The Future of Scholarly Journals.” In 1979 SSP Proceedings, pp. 82–84. Washington, D.C.: Society for Scholarly Publishing, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Kochen, M. “Discussion.” In Scientific Information Transfer: The Editor's Role, edited by M. Balaban, pp. 241–42. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Kochen, M., and B. Perkel. “Improving Referee Selection and Manuscript Evaluation.” In Scientific Information Transfer: The Editor's Role, edited by M. Balaban, pp. 203–29. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Konkle, W. W. “Authors, Editors, and Referees.” Science, 148 (April 1965), 443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krepel, W. J., and C. R. DuVall. Education and Education-Related Serials: A Directory. Littleton: Libraries Unlimited, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2d ed., enl. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, D. “Authors, Editors, and Referees.” Physical Review Letters, 45 (November 1980), 1527–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, L. “Academic Tenure: Its Recipients and Its Effects.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 448 (March 1980), 86–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsey, D. The Scientific Publication System in Social Science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey, D. “Editorial Vision and Journal Product.” The American Sociologist, 14 (November 1979), 241–42.
   Google Scholar
• Livingston, W. S. “Editorial Note.” The Journal of Politics, 33 (February 1971), v–viii.
   Google Scholar
• Lodahl, J., and G. Gordon. “The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Functioning of University Graduate Departments.” American Sociological Review, 37 (February 1972), 57–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodahl, J., and G. Gordon “Funding the Sciences in University Departments.” Educational Record, 54 (Winter 1973), 74–82.
   Google Scholar
• Lyle, S. P. “Authors' Guides to Scholarly Periodicals.” Scholarly Publishing, 10 (April 1979), 255–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manheim, F. T. “Referees and the Publications Crisis.” EOS, 54 (May 1973), 532–37.
   Google Scholar
• Martindale, D., and R. P. Mohan. “Some Problem Areas of Professional Social Science.” International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 16 (January & April 1979), 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• McCartney, J. L. “The Editors' Page: Manuscript Reviewing.” Sociological Quarterly, 14 (Summer 1973), 290, 440–44.
   Google Scholar
• McCartney, J. L. “The Editors' Page: Publish or Perish.” Sociological Quarterly, 14 (Autumn 1973), 450, 600–601.
   Google Scholar
• McCartney, J. L., and M. D. Leavy. “The Editors' Page: Selecting Reviewers.” Sociological Quarterly, 14 (Spring 1973), 146, 287–88.
   Google Scholar
• McReynolds, P. “Reliability of Ratings of Research Papers.” American Psychologist, 26 (April 1971), 400–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modern Language Association of America. MLA Directory of Periodicals: A Guide to Journals and Series in Languages and Literatures, 1980–81. New York: Modern Language Association, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, R. P., and G. S. Kowalski. “Refereed Journals and Professional Respectability.” International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 16 (January & April 1979), 154–67.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, W. J. “The Relative Quality of Economic Journals: A Suggested Rating System.” Western Economic Journal, 10 (June 1972), 156–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullins, C. J. A Guide to Writing and Publishing in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. New York: Wiley, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• National Enquiry into Scholarly Communication. Scholarly Communication: The Report of the National Enquiry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, S. H. “Improving the Evaluation of Submitted Manuscripts.” American Psychologist, 21 (October 1966), 980–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor, D., and P. Van Orden. “Getting into Print.” College and Research Libraries, 39 (September 1978), 389–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor, M. The Scientist as Editor: Guidelines for Editors of Books and Journals. New York: Wiley, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Page, I. H. “Needless Pains Caused by Heedless Editors.” Science, 147 (March 1965), 1241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasternack, S. “Is Journal Publication Obsolescent?” Physics Today, 19 (May 1966), 38–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petruzzi, J. M. “Peer Review in Analytical Chemistry.” Analytical Chemistry, 48 (September 1976), 875A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., G. R. Salancik, and H. Leblebici. “The Effect of Uncertainty on the Use of Social Influence in Organizational Decision Making.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 21 (June 1976), 227–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., A. Leong, and K. Strehl. “Paradigm Development and Particularism: Journal Publication in Three Scientific Disciplines.” Social Forces, 55 (June 1977), 939–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psathas, G. “Replies to Calvin Peters.” The American Sociologist, 11 (August 1976), 173–74.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoades, L. J. The Author's Guide to Selected Journals. ASA Professional Information Series. Washington, D.C.: American Sociological Association, [1975].
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, P. “Towards Open Refereeing.” New Scientist, 71 (August 1976), 410.
   Google Scholar
• Rodman, H. “Notes to an Incoming Journal Editor.” American Psychologist, 25 (March 1970), 269–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodman, H., and J. A. Mancini. “Editors, Manuscripts, and Equal Treatment.” Research in Higher Education, 7 (1977), 369–74.
   Google Scholar
• Rundell, W., Jr. “Author and Editor: Symbiotic Need.” AAUP Bulletin, 57 (September 1971), 368–72.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. A. “Interreferee Agreement on Some Characteristics of Manuscripts Submitted to the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.” American Psychologist, 29 (September 1974), 698–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, S. R. “The Publish or Perish Syndrome.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 16 (September 1973), 136–39, 180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, C. “Refereeing Justice.” Physics Today, 34 (January 1981), 15, 69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, R. M. “Editorial.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6 (July 1980), 439–40.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, S. “Ethical Questions in the Peer Review System.” In 1979 SSP Proceedings, pp. 67–69. Washington, D.C.: Society for Scholarly Publishing, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, R. J. “Diffusion of Educational Knowledge through Journals: Gatekeepers' Selection Criteria.” Viewpoints in Teaching and Learning, 54 (April 1978), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, R. J., and E. L. Collins. The “Gatekeeper” Role in Educational Journal Publishing. Final Report. ERIC Document, ED 111 427. Columbus: The Ohio State University Research Foundation, May 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, R. J., and E. L. Collins “Publishing Relationships in Higher Education.” Research in Higher Education, 3 (1975), 365–82.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, R. J. “Comment.” The American Sociologist, 14 (November 1979), 240–41.
   Google Scholar
• Smigel, E. D., and H. L. Ross. “Factors in the Editorial Decision.” The American Sociologist, 5 (February 1970), 19–21.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R., and F. E. Fiedler. “The Measurement of Scholarly Work: A Critical Review of the Literature.” Educational Record, 52 (Summer 1971), 225–32.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, D. C. “What's in a Name? —The Case for Author-Anonymous Reviewing Policies.” Change, 13 (March 1981), 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, A. G. “Authors, Editors, and Referees.” Science, 148 (April 1965), 444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stettenheim, P. “Peer Review I.” CBE Views, 2 (Fall 1979), 10.
   Google Scholar
• Stryker, S. “On the Editorial Review Process.” The American Sociologist, 14 (November 1979), 238–40.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. W. N. “A Systems Approach to the Management of a Scientific Journal.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 16 (September 1973), 148–55, 182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, W. D. “Reviewer and Author Anonymity.” Physics Today, 20 (January 1967), 12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, W. M. “A Study of Criteria for Journal Manuscripts.” American Psychologist, 25 (July 1970), 636–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, W. M. “Publication Problems in Psychology and an Explicit Evaluation Schema for Manuscripts.” American Psychologist, 28 (March 1973), 257–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoels, W. C. “The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Allocation of Editorships on Scientific Journals: Some Observations on the Politics of Knowledge.” Sociological Quarterly, 15 (Spring 1974), 264–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, H., and R. K. Merton. “Patterns of Evaluation in Science: Institutionalisation, Structure and Functions of the Referee System.” Minerva, 9 (January 1971), 66–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar