34
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

State Policy and the Public Research University

A Case Study of Manifest and Latent Tensions

Pages 363-397 | Published online: 01 Nov 2016

References

  • Admissions Task Force, The. (1987). Report of the admissions task force of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
  • Allison, G. T. (1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston: Little Brown and Company.
  • Alonso, W., & Starr, P. (1987). The politics of numbers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college?: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Banta, T., Rudolph, L. B., Van Dyke, J., & Fisher, H. S. (1996, January/February). Performance funding comes of age in Tennessee. Journal of Higher Education, 67, 23–45.
  • Berdahl, R., & Gove, W. (1982, May/June). Governing higher education: Faculty roles on state boards. Academe, 68, 21–24.
  • Birnbaum, R. (1988). Consistency and diversity in the goals of campus leaders. Review of Higher Education, 12(1), 17–30.
  • Bok, D. C. (1990). Universities and the future of America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Bok, D. C. (1992, July/August). Reclaiming the public trust. Change, 24(A), 12–19.
  • Breneman, D. W. (1993). Higher education: On a collision course with new realities. Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, Occasional Paper, 22.
  • Breneman, D. W. (1995, September 8). Sweeping, painful changes. Chronicle of Higher Education, 42(3), pp. B1–B2.
  • Cambanis, T. (1995, February 28) Chancellor in changing times. The Daily Tar Heel, pp. 1, 4–5.
  • Chance, W. (1993). The press and California higher education. A Report from the California Higher Education Policy Center, May 1993: The California Higher Education Policy Center.
  • Chronicle of Higher Education. (1995, February 24). State notes, p. A31.
  • Clarke, L. (1986, December 12). UNC-CH trustees debate policy. Raleigh News and Observer.
  • Cleveland, H. (1985). The knowledge executive: Leadership in an information society. New York: E. P. Dutton.
  • Cloninger, J. (1988, October 5). Administrators weigh merits of out-of-state quotas. The Daily Tar Heel, pp. 1, 7.
  • Cohen, M., & March, J. (1986). Leadership and ambiguity. The American college president. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Cole, J. (1993). Balancing acts: Dilemmas of choice facing research universities. Daedalus, 122(4), 1–36.
  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Daily Tar Heel, The. (1992, June 11). A 'bull'ish idea in the legislature, p. 8.
  • Dean, Jr., J. W., & Sharfman, M. P. (1996). Does decision process matter?: A study of strategic decision-making effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 368–396.
  • Economic Future Study Commission, The. (1991). Fiscal realities for the 90s. Raleigh, NC: Author.
  • Effron, S. (1986, March 15). A&T hit hardest by out-of-state limit. Greensboro (North Carolina) News and Record..
  • Eliot, T. S. (1934). The rock. London: Faber and Faber, Ltd.
  • Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Feldman, M., & March, J. (1981). Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 171–186.
  • Finifter, D. H., Baldwin, R. G., & Thelin, J. R. (1991). The uneasy public policy triangle: Quality, diversity, and budgetary efficiency. New York: ACE-Macmillan.
  • Fisher, J. L. (1988). The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: Review. McLean, VA: J. L. Fisher, Ltd.
  • Geiger, R. L. (1985). Research universities: Their role in undergraduate education. In National Institute of Education, Contexts for Learning: The Major Sectors of American Higher Education. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education.
  • General Alumni Association of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. (1989). General alumni association task force report..
  • Gilley, J. W. (1991). Thinking about American higher education: The 1990s and beyond. New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan.
  • Gold, S. D. (1995). The fiscal crisis of the states. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Graham, H. D. (1989). Structure and governance in American higher education: Historical and comparative analysis in state policy. Journal of Policy History, 1(1), 80–107.
  • Gumport, P. J. (1993, May/June). The contested terrain of academic program reduction. Journal of Higher Education, 59, 611–633.
  • Hall, R. (1982). Organizations: Structure and process (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Hardin, P. (1994, October 2). Higher education at the millennium: Celebrations and concerns. Address for the University Day Conversation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
  • Harvey, J., & Immerwahr, J. (1995, Fall). Public perceptions of higher education: On main street and in the boardroom. Educational Record, 76(4), 51–55.
  • Healy, P. (1996, August 9). Activist Republican trustees change the way public universities seek presidents. Chronicle of Higher Education, 42(48), pp. A19–20.
  • Hearn, J. C., & Corcoran, M. (1988, November/December). An exploration of the factors behind the proliferation of the institutional research enterprise. Journal of Higher Education, 59, 634–651.
  • Hearn, J. C., & Griswold, C. P. (1994). State-level centralization and policy innovation in U.S. postsecondary education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(2), 161–190.
  • Hearn, J. C., Griswold, C. P., & Marine, G. M. (1996). Region, resources, and reason: A contextual analysis of state tuition and student-aid policies. Research in Higher Education, 37(3), 241–278.
  • Jaschik, S. (1987, September 16). North Carolina's highly regarded university system struggles to adapt to life after Bill Friday. Chronicle of Higher Education, 34(3), pp. A23, A30–A31.
  • Jaschik, S. (1989, April 26). Chapel Hill campus struggles with problems of governance: North Carolina's flagship versus the state. Chronicle of Higher Education, 35(33), pp. A17–A18.
  • Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Kerr, C. (1982). The uses of the university (3rd. ed.) Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little-Brown.
  • Little, C. J. (1995). A study of the early effects of the HOPE grant at public colleges and universities in Georgia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
  • Massey, W. E. (1994). Can the research university adapt to a changing future? In J. R. Cole, E. G. Barber, & S. R. Graubard (Eds.), The research university in a time of discontent (pp. 191–202). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • McGuinness, A. C. Jr. (1988). State postsecondary education structures handbook: 1988. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
  • Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure, 1968 enlarged edition. New York: The Free Press.
  • Metzger, W. P. (1955). Academic freedom in the age of the university. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • North Carolina Memorandum, The. (1986a, February/March). North Carolina college trustees: A profile of our state's higher education leaders, Volume 1, Number 1 of a publication “for the trustees of postsecondary education in North Carolina,” from the Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation: Winston-Salem, NC.
  • North Carolina Memorandum, The. (1986b, October/November). Unused (wasted?) capacity. Volume 1, Number 5 of a publication “for the trustees of postsecondary education in North Carolina,” from the Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation, Winston-Salem, NC.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Pettigrew, A. (1973). The politics of organizational decision making. London: Tavistock.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1981) Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
  • Pitts, M. B. (1990). Increase wins backing: Officials support out-of-state enrollment hike. The Daily Tar Heel, p. 1.
  • Prewitt, K. (1993). America's research universities under public scrutiny. Daedalus, 122(4), 85–99.
  • Rhoades, G. (1995). Rethinking restructuring in universities. Journal for Higher Education Management, 10(2), 17–30.
  • Rudenstine, N. L. (1996, April 19). Why a diverse student body is so important. Chronicle of Higher Education, 42(32), pp. B1–2.
  • Simsek, H., & Louis, K. S. (1994, November/December). Organizational change as paradigm shift: Analysis of the change process in a large, public university. Journal of Higher Education, 65, 670–695.
  • Slaughter, S. (1995). Criteria for restructuring postsecondary education. Journal for Higher Education Management, 10(2), 31–44.
  • Stokey, E., & Zeckhauser, R. (1978). A primer for policy analysis. New York: Norton.
  • Student Government Executive Branch. (1994, January 17). A report from the front line: A comprehensive evaluation of the university in its bicentennial year. Chapel Hill: Author.
  • Students for Educational Access. (1990). University at risk: An assessment of the state budget cuts' impact on education and services at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Chapel Hill, NC: Author.
  • Terenzini, P. T. (1995). Evolution and revolution in institutional research. Keynote address to the annual meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, Boston, May 29.
  • Third Century Project, The. (1986). How good are we? Are we good enough?: An overview of collegiate education in North Carolina. Winston-Salem, NC: Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation
  • Third Century Project, The. (1987). Continuing the conversation: Observations and conclusions about postsecondary education in North Carolina. Winston-Salem, NC: Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation
  • Trombley, W. (1993). Public policy by anecdote: The case of community college fees. San Jose, CA: The California Higher Education Policy Center.
  • Trow, M. A. (1983). Organization and leadership in universities: The case of biology at Berkeley. Conference Paper, Swedish National Board of Colleges and Universities. Rosenon, Dalaro, Sweden.
  • Tuckman, H. P., & Chang, C. F. (1988, November/December). Conflict, congruence, and generic university goals. Journal of Higher Education, 59, 611–633.
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, The. (1995). All useful learning: Initiating a third century of distinction. An institutional self-study report. Chapel Hill, NC: Author.
  • Wadsworth, D. (1995, June). The new public landscape: Where higher education stands. AAHE Bulletin, 14–17.
  • Walker, R. (1995, April 11). Regents to vote on fee changes. Atlanta Constitution, p. C1.
  • Wallsten, P. (1992). Lawmakers balk at out-of-state students. The Daily Tar Heel, 100(40), pp. 1–2.
  • Washington Post, The. (1993, February 21). Close to home: The case for out-of-state students. p. C8.
  • Weathersby, G. B. (1984, January/February). Our fading state colleges: Have they lost their vitality and mission? Change, 16, 18–23.
  • Wildavsky, A. (1979). Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
  • Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.