3,742
Views
69
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric

References

  • Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. (1997, April 9). ABET Engineering Criteria 2000. [On-line]. Available: http://www.abet.ba.md.us./EAC/eac2000.html.
  • Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Berger, J., & Zelditch, M. (Eds.) (1985). Status, rewards, and influence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Black, K. M. (1994). An industry view of engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 83, 26–28.
  • Bosworth, K., & Hamilton, J. (1994). Collaborative learning: Underlying processes and effective techniques. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 59. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Coleman, R. J. (1996). The engineering education coalitions. ASEE Prism, 6, 24–31.
  • Cross, N., & Cross, A. C. (1995). Observations of teamwork and social processes in design. Design Studies, 16, 143–170.
  • Ehrlenspiel, K., & Dylla, N. (1993). Experimental investigation of designers' thinking methods and design procedures. Journal of Engineering Design, 4, 201–212.
  • Ennis, C. W., Jr., & Gyeszly, S. W. (1991). Protocol analysis of the engineering systems design process. Research in Engineering Design, 3, 15–22.
  • Fiechtner, S. B., & Davis, E. A. (1984–85). Why some groups fail: A survey of students' experiences with learning groups. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 9, 58–71.
  • Gamson, Z. F. (1994). Collaborative learning comes of age. In S. Kadel & J. A. Keehner (Ed.), Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education (Vol. 2, pp. 5–17). University Park, PA: National Center for Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment, The Pennsylvania State University.
  • Hunkeler, D., & Sharp, J. E. (1997). Assigning functional groups: The influence of group size, academic record, practical experience, and learning style. Journal of Engineering Education, 86, 321–332.
  • Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 530–557.
  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive and individualistic learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4). Washington DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998, July-August). Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Change, 27–35.
  • Jones, E. A. (Ed). (1996). Preparing competent college graduates: Setting new and higher expectations for student learning. New Directions for Higher Education, No. 96. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585–634.
  • Light, R. (1992). Harvard assessment seminars second report: Explorations with students and faculty about teaching, learning, and student life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
  • Miller, J. E., Trimbur, J., & Wilkes, J. M., 1994). Group dynamics: Understanding groups' success and failure in collaborative learning. In K. Bosworth & S. J. Hamilton (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Underlying processes and effective techniques (pp. 33–44). New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 59. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Mills, B. J., & Cotteli, P. G., Jr. (1998). Cooperative learning for higher education faculty. Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education and Oryx Press.
  • Pascarella, E. (1985). College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development: A critical review and synthesis. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 1, pp. 1–62). New York: Agathon.
  • Pascarella, E., & Tereiizini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Rosser, S. V. (1998). Group work in science, engineering, and mathematics: Consequences of ignoring gender and race. College Teaching, 46, 82–88.
  • Schilder, J. (1992). Work teams boost productivity. Personnel Journal, 71, 67–71.
  • Slavin, R. E. (1983). Cooperative learning. New York: Longman.
  • Slavin, R. E. (1989). Cooperative learning and student achievement: Six theoretical perspectives. In Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation enhancing environments (Vol. 6, pp. 161–177). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc.
  • Smith, B. L., & MacGregor, J. T. (1992). What is collaborative learning? In A. Goodsell, M. Maher, V. Tinto, B. L. Smith, & J. T. MacGregor (Ed.), Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education. University Park, PA: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning & Assessment, The Pennsylvania State University.
  • Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. (1997). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education. Albuquerque, NM, November, 1997.
  • Sutton, R. I., & Hargadon, A. (1996). Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 685–718.
  • Terenzini, P. T., Theophilides, C., & Lorang, W. G. (1984). Influences on students' perceptions of their academic skill development during college. Journal of Higher Education, 55, 621–636.
  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Watkins, B. T. (1990, (August 1). Growing number of older students stir professors to alter teaching styles. Chronicle of Higher Education, 36, p. Al.
  • Webb, N. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 366–389.
  • Weidman, J. (1989). Undergraduate socialization: A conceptual approach. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 5, pp. 289–322). New York: Agathon.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.