The Relation between Research Productivity and Teaching Effectiveness

References

• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in College? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, P. J. (1986). The helter-skelter relationship between teaching and research: A cluster of problems and small wins. Teaching Sociology, 14, 50–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise in control. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, B. (1992, June 3). Teaching and research are inescapably incompatible. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A40.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. (1997). Higher education: A critical business. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bausell, R. B., & Magoon, J. (1972). The validation of student ratings of instruction: An institutional research model. Newark, DE: College of Education, University of Delaware.
   Google Scholar
• Black, S. (1972). Interactions between teaching and research. Universities Quarterly, 26, 348–352.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, R. T. (1974) The meaning of work in academia. In J. I. Doi (Ed.), Assessing faculty effort. New Directions for Institutional Research (Vol. 2, pp. 75–99). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship revisited: Priorities in the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Braxton, J. M. (1996). Contrasting perspectives on the relationship between teaching and research. New Directions for Institutional Research (Vol. 90, pp. 5–14). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Braxton, J. M., & Hargens, L. L. (1996). Variation among academic disciplines: Analytic frameworks and research. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: A handbook of theory and research (Vol. 11, pp. 1–46). New York: Agathon.
   Google Scholar
• Brew, A. (1999). Research and teaching: Changing relationships in a changing context. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 291–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brew, A., & Boud, D. (1995). Teaching and research: Establishing the vital link with learning. Higher Education, 29, 261–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, M. J. (1974). Organizational stress and professional performance among faculty members at a small college. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1973). Dissertation Abstracts International, 35, A209.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Colbeck, C. C. (1998). Merging in a seamless blend: How faculty integrate teaching and research. Journal of Higher Education, 69, 647–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crittenden, B. (1997). Minding their business: The proper role of universities and some suggested reforms. Academy of the Social Sciences: Canberra, ACT, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Delaney, E. L. (1976). The relationships of student ratings of instruction to student, instructor and course characteristics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 126 140).
   Google Scholar
• Ethington, C. A. (1997). A hierarchical linear modeling approach to studying college effects. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 12). New York: Agathon.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, K. (1987). Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: A review and exploration. Research in Higher Education, 26, 227–298.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M. F. (1992). Research, teaching, and publication productivity: Mutuality versus competition in academia. Sociology of Education, 65, 293–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H., Rasbash, J., Plewis, I., Draper, D., Browne, W., Yang, M., Woodhouse, G., & Healy, M. (1998). A user's guide to MLwiN. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, P. J., Diamond, R. M., & Adam, B. E. (1996). A national study on the relative importance of research and undergraduate teaching at colleges and universities. Center for Instructional Development, Syracuse University.
   Google Scholar
• Halsey, A. H. (1992). Decline of donnish dominion: The British academic profession in the twentieth century. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Harry, J., & Goldner, N. S. (1972). The null relationship between teaching and research. Sociology of Education, 45, 47–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J, & Marsh, H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching–a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 507–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A., Print, M., & Krakowski, K. (1994). Productivity of academics. Australian Journal of Education, 38, 201–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A., Tognolini, J., Adams, K., & Curtis, P. (1990). An evaluation of a model for allocating research funds across departments within a university using selected indicators of performance. Canberra, Australia: Department of Employment, Education, and Training.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, R. A. (1984). An assessment of the teaching, research, and service function of a college faculty. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 17, 51–54.
   Google Scholar
• Jauch, L. R. (1976). Relationships of research and teaching: Implications for faculty evaluation. Research in Higher Education, 5, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Jencks, C., & Riesman D. (1968). The academic revolution. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, A., Blackman, T., Lindsay, R., & Paton-Saltzberg, R. (1998). Teaching and research: Student perspectives and policy implications. Studies in Higher Education, 23, 127–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. (1988). Research and teaching in the universities of Denmark: Does such an interplay really exist? Higher Education, 17, 17–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A. (1996). The design and analysis of social-interaction research Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 59–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinster-Mackay, D. P. (1978). The idea of a university: A historical perspective on some precepts and practices. Vestes, 20(4), 28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Light, D. (1974). Introduction: The structure of the academic professions. Sociology of Education, 47, 2–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, R. (1999). Teaching and research-the missing link? Oxford Brookes University website: www.brookes.ac.uk/services/ocsd/linkl/research/rtlindsay.html
   Google Scholar
• Linsky, A. S., & Straus, M. A. (1975). Student evaluations, research productivity, and eminence of college faculty. Journal of Higher Education, 46, 89–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1984). Students' evaluations of teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 707–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for further research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 253–388.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & Overall, J. W. (1979). Validity of students' evaluations of teaching: A comparison with instructor self-evaluations by teaching assistants, undergraduate faculty, and graduate faculty. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED 177 205).
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. (1993). The use of students' evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 217–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (1997). Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective. American Psychologist, 52, 1187–1197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & Rowe, K. J., & Martin, A. (2002). PhD students' evaluations of research supervision: Issues, complexities and challenges in a nationwide Australian experiment in benchmarking universities. Journal of Higher Education, 73, 313–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullagh, R. D., & Roy, M. R. (1975). The contribution of noninstructional activities to college classroom teacher effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Education, 44, 61–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, E. D., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1970). Relationships between faculty ratings and indices of service and scholarship. Proceedings of the 78th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 5, 619–620.
   Google Scholar
• McInnis, C. (1992). Changes in the nature of academic work. Australian Universities' Review, 35, 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, M. M. (1996, April). Role conflict among university faculty. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York City.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, C. J. (1991, May 8). Professors feel conflict between roles in teaching and research. Say students are badly prepared. Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. 15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Moore W. E. (1963). Man, time, and society. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, B. (1992) Perceptions of the teaching-research nexus: A framework for analysis, Higher Education, 23, 159–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, R. (1994). The teaching-research nexus: Applying a framework to university students' learning experiences. European Journal of Education, 29, 323–339.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, D., & Simmons, A. J. M. (1996). The research versus teaching debate: Untangling the relationships. New Directions for institutional Research, 90, 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (1998). Managing the effective university. Higher Education Research and Development, 17, 347–370.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P., & Moses, I. (1992). Association between research and teaching in Australian higher education. Higher Education, 23, 273–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, S. (1996). Relationships between teaching and research. Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sample, S. B. (1972). Inherent conflict between research and education. Educational Record, 53, 17–22.
   Google Scholar
• Scriven, M. (1980). The Evaluation of College Teaching. Professional Development. Occasional Paper Number 3. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED203729).
   Google Scholar
• Scriven, M. (1981). Summative teacher evaluation. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 244–271). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scriven, M. (1988, March 13). Evaluating teachers as professionals. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED300882).
   Google Scholar
• Scriven, M. (1994) Using student ratings in teacher evaluation: Evaluation perspectives. Newsletter of The Center for Research on Educational Accountability and Teacher Evaluation, 4, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, B., Pinker, S., & Bates, M. (1990). Research as a model for university teaching. Higher Education, 19, 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smelby, J. C. (1998). Knowledge production and knowledge transmission: The interaction between research and teaching at universities. Teaching in Higher Education, 3, 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, A. V. S. (1996). Teaching norms and publication productivity. New Directions for Institutional Research, 90, 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Trice, A. J. (1992, June 17) The tensions between teaching and scholarship. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. B4.
   Google Scholar
• Volkwein, J. F., & Carbone, D. (1991, November). A study of research and teaching orientations in twenty-seven academic departments: The impact on undergraduates. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Boston, MA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 339 332).
   Google Scholar
• Volkwein, J. F., & Carbone, D. A. (1994). The impact of departmental research and teaching climates on undergraduate growth and satisfaction. Journal of Higher Education. 65, 147–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, D. (1985). Does research productivity enhance teaching? Educational Record, 66, 60–62.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, D. (1986). Research productivity and classroom teaching effectiveness. Instructional Evaluation, 9, 14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, P. (1978, March). Student and peer ratings of college teaching and peer ratings of research and service: Four years of departmental evaluation. Paper presented at the annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, Canada. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED007 347).
   Google Scholar
• Woodhouse, D. (1998). Auditing research and the research/teaching nexus. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 33, 39–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar