Teaching Awards: What Do They Award?

References

• Adams, C. C. (1977). Faculty awards programs: Campus-based and systemwide. Long Beach, CA: California State University and Colleges, Center for Professional Development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 136 725)
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, T. A. (1996). Relating exemplary teaching to student learning. In M. D. Svinicki & R. J. Menges (Eds.), Honoring exemplary teaching (pp. 57–64). New Directions in Teaching and Learning, No. 65. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (2001). The reflective institution: Assuring and enhancing the quality of teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41, 221–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. (2000). Retrieved August 13, 2002, from http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/Classification/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Cashin, W. E. (1990). Assessing teaching effectiveness. In P. Seldin & Associates (Eds.), How administrators can improve teaching: Moving from talk to action in higher education (pp. 89–103). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Centra, J. (1993). Reflective faculty evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Centra, J., Froh, R. C., Gray, P. J., & Lambert, L. M. (1987). A guide to evaluating teaching for promotion and tenure. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University.
   Google Scholar
• Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1989). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Chism, N. V. N. (1999). Peer review of teaching: A sourcebook. Bolton, MA: Anker.
   Google Scholar
• Chism, N. V. N., & Szabo, B. (1997). Teaching awards: The problem of assessing their impact. In D. DeZure (Ed.), To improve the academy: Yearbook of the Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education (pp. 181–199). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cranton, P. (2001). Interpretive and critical evaluation. In C. Knapper & P. Cranton (Eds.), Fresh approaches to the evaluation of teaching (pp. 11–18). New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 88. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, J. F. (1988). Exemplary instruction of adults. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 36(2), 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Eble, K. E. (1983). The aims of college teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. (1979). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Elton, L. (1998). Dimensions of excellence in university teaching. International Journal of Academic Development, 3(1), 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Elton, L., & Partington, P. (1993). Teaching standards and excellence in higher education (2nd ed.). Sheffield, UK: USDU.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, K. A. (1988). Effective college teaching from the students' and faculty's view: Matched or mismatched priorities. Research in Higher Education, 28(4), 291–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, K. A. (1996). Identifying exemplary teaching: Using data from course and teacher evaluations. In M. D. Svinicki & R. J. Menges (Eds.), Honoring exemplary teaching (pp. 41–50). New Directions in Teaching and Learning, No. 65. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T. J. (2001). Using student outcomes to evaluate teaching: A cautious exploration. In C. Knapper & P. Cranton (Eds.), Fresh approaches to the evaluation of teaching (pp. 63–74). New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 88. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Fink, D. (2004, Spring/Summer). President's column. POD Network News. Retrieved July 11, 2004, from http://www.podnetwork.org/publications&resources/newsletter/spring04.htm
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. B. (1976). An evaluation of programs to recognize and reward teaching excellence. Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo, Department of Higher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 156 723)
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (1995, May/June). Promoting excellent teaching is harder than you'd think. Change, 27(3), 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmid, C. A., Gruber, J. E., & Wilson, E. K. (1977). Perceived attributes of superior teachers (PAST): An inquiry into the giving of teacher awards. American Educational Research Journal, 14(4), 423–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., &. Gillmore, G. G. (1997, November). Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist, 52, 1209–1217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hounsell, D. (1996). Documenting and assessing teaching excellence. In R. Aylett & K. Gregory (Eds.), Evaluating teacher quality in higher education (pp. 72–76). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knapper, C. (2001). Broadening our approach to teaching evaluation. In C. Knapper & P. Cranton (Eds.), Fresh approaches to the evaluation of teaching (pp. 3–9). New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 88. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowman, J. (1994). Professors as performers and motivators. College Teaching, 42, 137–141.
   Google Scholar
• Lowman, J. (1996). Characteristics of exemplary teachers. In M. D. Svinicki & R. J. Menges (Eds.), Honoring exemplary teaching (pp. 33–40). New Directions in Teaching and Learning, No. 65. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (2000). Effects of grading leniency and low workload on students' evaluations of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 202–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauksch, H. O. (1987). The context of preparing teaching assistants. In N. V. N. Chism (Ed.), Institutional roles and responsibilities in the employment and education of teaching assistants (pp. 14–18). Columbus: The Ohio State University Center for Teaching Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., & Harris, R. (2002). Evaluating teaching effectiveness and teaching improvement: A language for institutional policies and academic development practices. International Journal of Academic Development, 7(1), 7–17.
   Google Scholar
• McKeachie, W. J. (1997, November). Student ratings: The validity of use. American Psychologist, 52, 1218–1225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaught, C., & Anwyl, J. (1993). Awards for teaching at Australian universities (Centre for the Study of Higher Education Research Working Papers, 93.1). Victoria, Australia: University of Melbourne. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 368 291)
   Google Scholar
• Menges, R. J. (1996). Awards to individuals. In M. D. Svinicki & R. J. Menges (Eds.), Honoring exemplary teaching (pp. 3–9). New Directions in Teaching and Learning, No. 65. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, A. (1987, October). Teaching awards and tokenism. Teaching Professor, 1(8), 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, R. D., Watson, M. D., Kelly, K., & Paquin, A. R. (1998). Helping teachers teach well: A new system for measuring and improving teaching effectiveness in higher education. San Francisco: New Lexington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P., Margetson, D., Martin, E., & Clarke, S. (1995). Recognising and rewarding good teaching. Cranberra, Australia: AGPS. Retrieved August 13, 2001, from http://www.autc.gov.au/caut/rrgt/titlepag.html
   Google Scholar
• Schonwetter, D. T., Sokal, L., Friesen, M., & Taylor, K. L. (2002). Teaching philosophies reconsidered: A conceptual model for the development and evaluation of teaching philosophy statements. International Journal of Academic Development, 7(1), 83–97.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. (2001). Formative evaluation and the scholarship of teaching and learning. In C. Knapper & P. Cranton (Eds.), Fresh approaches to the evaluation of teaching (pp. 51–62). New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 88. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Svinicki, M. D. (1995). The seven deadly comments that get in the way of learning about teaching. In T. A. Heenan & K. F. Jerich (Eds.), Conference proceedings: The fourth national conference on the education and employment of graduate teaching assistants (pp. 13–18). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Svinicki, M. D., & Menges, R. J. (1996). Consistency within diversity: Guidelines for programs to honor exemplary teaching. In M. D. Svinicki & R. J. Menges (Eds.), Honoring exemplary teaching (pp. 109–113). New Directions in Teaching and Learning, No. 65. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K. (2001). Judging university teaching. International Journal of Academic Development, 6(1), 65–73.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, R., & Plumb, E. (1999). Survey of distinguished teacher award schemes in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 23(2), 245–255.
   Google Scholar
• Weimer, M. (1997). Assumptions that devalue university teaching. International Journal of Academic Development, 2(1), 52–58.
   Google Scholar