“Incentives for Managed Growth”: A Case Study of Incentives-Based Planning and Budgeting in a Large Public Research University

References

• Adams, E. M. (1997, September/October). Rationality in the academy: Why responsibility center budgeting is a wrong step down the wrong road. Change, 29, 58–61.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, D. J., & Hoenack, S. A. (1987). The concept of cost-related tuition and its implementation at the University of Minnesota. Journal of Higher Education, 58, 276–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, R. (2000). The life cycle of academic management fads. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulding, K. (1978, January/February). In praise of inefficiency. AGB Reports, 44–48.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, H. R. (1982, September). Sharing the effects: The art of retrenchment. AAHE Bulletin, 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Bruininks, R. H., & Kvavik, R. B. (1999, February 1). Incentives for managed growth: A paper for discussion with the university community. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota. Retrieved from http://www.evpp.umn.edu/rcm/imgupd.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, K. S., & Whetten, D. A. (1983). Organizational effectiveness: A comparison of multiple models. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cantor, N. E., & Courant, P. N. (1997, November 26). Budgets and budgeting at the University of Michigan—A work in progress. Ann Arbor, MI: The University Record. Retrieved from http://www.umich.edu/%7Eurecord/9798/Nov26__97/budget.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Cantor, N. E., & Courant, P. N. (2003). Scrounging for resources: Reflections on the whys and wherefores of higher education finance. In F. K. Alexander & R. G. Ehrenberg (Ed.), Maximizing revenue in higher education (pp. 3–12). New Directions for Institutional Research, Vol. 119. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cogan, R. (1980). The design of budgeting processes for state-funded higher education organizations. The Journal of Higher Education, 51, 556–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, R. L. (2002). The American university at the beginning of the twenty-first century: Signposts on the path to privatization. In R. M. Adams (Ed.), Trends in American and German higher education (pp. 33–84). Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Louis, Gros K. R. R., & Thompson, M. (2002). Responsibility center budgeting and management at Indiana University. In D. M. Priest, W. E. Becker, D. Hossler, & E. P. St. John (Ed.), Incentive-based budgeting systems in public universities (pp. 93–107). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gumport, P. J. (1993). The contested terrain of academic program reduction. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 283–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. C., & Gorbunov, A. V. (in press). Funding the core: Understanding the financial contexts of academic departments in the humanities (Occasional paper of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences). Cambridge, MA: American Academy of the Arts and Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. C., & Heydinger, R. B. (1985). Scanning the external environment of a university: Objectives, constraints, and possibilities. Journal of Higher Education, 56(4), 419–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. C., & Holdsworth, J. M. (2002). The societally responsive university: Public ideals, organizational realities, and the possibility of engagement. Tertiary Education and Management, 80(2), 127–144.
   Google Scholar
• Heydinger, R. B. (1982). Using program priorities to make retrenchment decisions: The case of the University of Minnesota. Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board.
   Google Scholar
• Hoenack, S. A. (1977). Direct and incentive planning within a university. Socio-economic Planning Sciences, 11, 191–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovey, H. A. (1999). State spending for higher education in the next decade: The battle to sustain current support (National Center Report 99–3). Washington, DC: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J., & St. John, E. P. (2002, June). The impact of incentives-based budgeting on planning: Understanding the structural and political aspects of budget reform. Paper presented at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Toronto, ON.
   Google Scholar
• Kallsen, L. A., Oju, E. C., Baylor, L. M., & Bruininks, R. H. (2001, June). An RCM Success Story? Empirical Results of Responsibility Centered Management Principles. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, Long Beach, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, G. (1983). Academic strategy: The management revolution in American higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirp, D. L., & Roberts, P. S. (2002, Summer). Mr. Jefferson's university breaks up. The Public Interest, 70–84.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, D. W. (2001). A primer on responsibility centre budgeting and responsibility center management. In J. L. Yeager, G. M. Nelson, E. A. Potter, J. C. Weidman, & T. G. Zullo (Ed.), ASHE reader on finance in higher education (2nd ed., pp. 568–590). Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing. (Reprinted from the CSSHE Professional File #117, Winter 1999, No. 17.)
   Google Scholar
• Lang, D. W. (2002). Responsibility center budgeting at the University of Toronto. In D. M. Priest, W. E. Becker, D. Hossler, & E. P. St. John (Ed.), Incentive-based budgeting systems in public universities (pp. 111–135). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Lasher, W. F., & Greene, D. L. (1993). College and university budgeting: What do we know? What do we need to know? In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 428–469). New York: Agathon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, L. L. (1984). Responding to new realities in funding. New Directions in Institutional Research, 43, 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, L. L., Oaxaca, R. L., & Rhoades, G. (2002). Revenue flux and university behavior. In D. M. Priest, W. E. Becker, D. Hossler, & E. P. St. John (Ed.), Incentive-based budgeting systems in public universities (pp. 111–135). Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, L. L., & Slaughter, S. A. (1997). The development and current status of market mechanisms in United States postsecondary education. Higher Education Policy, 10, 239–252.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, H. M. (1991). Raising productivity in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 62, 241–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. R., & Dundar, H. (1999). Costs and productivity in higher education: Theory, evidence and policy implications. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education Handbook of theory and research (pp. 39–102). New York: Agathon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massy, W. F. (1989–90). Budget decentralization at Stanford University. Planning for Higher Education, 18, 39–55.
   Google Scholar
• Massy, W. F. (1996a). Reengineering resource allocation systems. In W. F. Massy (Ed.), Resource allocation in higher education (pp. 15–48). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massy, W. F. (1996b). Value responsibility budgeting. In W. F. Massy (Ed.), Resource allocation in higher education (pp. 293–323). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meisinger, R. J. (1994). College and university budgeting: An introduction for faculty and academic administrators. Washington, DC: National Association of College and University Business Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Mingle, J. R. (2000). Higher education's future in “corporatized” economy (Occasional Paper No. 44). Washington, DC: Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges.
   Google Scholar
• Moloney, D. P., & Grotevant, S. M. (1997, May). Collegiate and departmental performance indicators: The measures that matter! Paper presented at the 37th Annual Association for Institutional Research Forum, Lake Buena Vista, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Priest, D. M., Becker, W. E., Hossler, D., & St. John, E. P. (Eds.). (2002). Incentive-based budgeting systems in public universities. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Priest, D. M., St. John, E. P., & Tobin, W. (2002). Incentive-based budgeting: An evolving approach. In D. M. Priest, W. E. Becker, D. Hossler, & E. P. St. John, (Ed.), Incentive-based budgeting systems in public universities (pp. 227–235). Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Rodas, D. (2001). Resource allocation in private research universities. New York: Routledge-Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Simsek, H., & Louis, K. S. (1994). Organizational change as paradigm shift: Analysis of the change process in a large, public university. Journal of Higher Education, 65(6), 670–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S. (1993). Retrenchment in the 1980's: The politics of prestige and gender. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 250–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stocum, D. L., & Rooney, P. M. (1997, September/October). Responding to resource constraints: A departmentally based system of responsibility center management. Change, 29(5), 51–57.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, J., Curry, J., & Whalen, E. (1996). Revenue responsibility budgeting. In W. F. Massy (Ed.), Resource allocation in higher education (pp. 163–190). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundquist, J. E. (1997). Uncertainty in a time of constrained resources. In P. M. Callan & J. E. Finney (Ed.), Public and private financing of higher education (pp. 169–197). Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education and The Oryx Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toutkoushian, R. K., & Danielsen, C. (2002). Using performance indicators to evaluate decentralized budgeting systems and institutional performance. In D. M. Priest, W. E. Becker, D. Hossler, & E. P. St. John (Ed.), Incentive-based budgeting systems in public universities (pp. 205–226). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• University of Minnesota. (1997, December 11). Institutional Performance Report. Minneapolis, MN: Author.
   Google Scholar
• University of Minnesota. (1999). Responsibility center management: Report of the Responsibility Center Management Working Committee. Minneapolis, MN: Author. Retrieved from www.evpp.umn/rcm/rptl.html.
   Google Scholar
• University of Minnesota. (2000, January 21). Report of the University of Minnesota Budget Management Task Force. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Volk, C. S., Slaughter, S., & Thomas, S. L. (2001). Models of institutional resource allocation: Mission, market, and gender. Journal of Higher Education, 72, 387–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, J. A., Seidita, V., DiMattia, J., & Whalen, E. L. (1997). RCM as catalyst: Study examines use of responsibility center management on campus. NACUBO Business Officer, August, 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Whalen, E. L. (1991). Responsibility center budgeting: An approach to decentralized management for institutions of higher education. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whalen, E. L. (2002). The case, if any, for responsibility center budgeting. In D. M. Priest, W. E. Becker, D. Hossler, & E. P. St. John (Ed.), Incentive-based Budgeting systems in public universities (pp. 111–135). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Wilms, W. W., Teruya, C., & Walpole, M. (1997, September/October). Fiscal reform at UCLA: The clash of accountability and academic freedom. Change, 29, 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Yudof, M. G. (2002, January 11). Point of view: Is the public research university dead? The Chronicle of Higher Education, 48, p. B24.
   Google Scholar
• Zemsky, R., Porter, R., & Oedel, L. P. (1978). Decentralized planning: To share responsibility. Educational Record, 59, 229–253.
   Google Scholar