525
Views
43
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Greener Pastures: Faculty Turnover Intent in Urban Public Universities

Pages 776-803 | Published online: 01 Nov 2016

References

  • Adams, J. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social exchange (pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.
  • Argyris, C. (1964). Integrating the individual and the organization. New York: Wiley.
  • Austin, A. (1990). Faculty cultures, faculty values. In W. Tierney (Ed.), Assessing academic climates and cultures (pp. 61–74). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Austin, A. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94–122.
  • Baker, P., & Zey-Farrell, M. (1984). Local and cosmopolitan orientations of faculty: Implications for teaching. Teaching Sociology, 12(1), 82–106.
  • Baldridge, J., Curtis, D., Ecker, G., & Riley, G. (1973). The impact of institutional size and complexity on faculty autonomy. Journal of Higher Education, 44, 532–548.
  • Barnes, L., Agago, M., & Coombs, W. (1998). Effects of job-related stress on faculty intention to leave academia. Research in Higher Education, 39(4), 457–469.
  • Berdahl R. (1990). Public universities and state governments: Is the tension benign? Educational Record, 71(1), 38–42.
  • Bess, J. (1988). Collegiality and bureaucracy in the modern university. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
  • Biddle, B. (1979). Role theory: Expectations, identities, and behaviors. New York: Academic Press.
  • Biegen, M., Mueller, C., & Price, J. (1988). Measurement of kinship responsibility for organizational research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 402–409.
  • Bluedorn, A. (1982). The theories of turnover: Causes, effects, and meaning. In S. Bacharach (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organizations (pp. 75–128). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Bowen, H., & Schuster, J. (1986). American professors: A national resource imperiled. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
  • Breaugh, J. (1985). The measurement of work autonomy. Human Relations, 38, 551–570.
  • Coalition of Urban and Metropolitan Universities. (2004). Declaration of metropolitan universities. Retrieved July 21, 2004 from http://cumu.uc.iupui.edu/declaration.asp
  • Currivan, D. (1999). The causal order of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in models of employee turnover. Human Resources Management Review, 9(4), 495–524.
  • Dailey, R., & Kirk, D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as antecedents of job dissatisfaction and intent to turnover. Human Relations, 45(3), 305–317.
  • Elliott, P. (1994). The urban campus: Educating the new majority for the new century. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
  • Etzioni, A. (1969). The semi-professions and their organization. New York: Free Press.
  • Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 115–130.
  • Fuhrmann, B. (1994). Leadership issues for faculty: A round-table discussion. Metropolitan Universities, 5(3), 71–77.
  • Goodwall, L. (1970). The urban university: Is there such a thing? Journal of Higher Education, 41, 44–54.
  • Griffeth, R., & Horn, P. (1988). A comparison of different conceptualizations of perceived alternatives in turnover research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9(2), 103–111.
  • Hackman, J., & Oldham, G. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hagedorn, L. (1996). Wage equity and female faculty job satisfaction: The role of wage differentials in a job satisfaction causal model. Research in Higher Education, 37(5), 569–598.
  • Halaby, C., & Weakliem, D. (1989). Worker control and attachment to the firm. American Journal of Sociology, 95(3), 549–591.
  • Humphrey, W. (1987). Managing for innovation: Leading technical people. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Iverson, R. D., & Roy, P. (1994). A causal model of behavioral commitment: Evidence from a study of Australian blue-collar employees. Journal of Management, 20(1), 15–42.
  • Johnson, D. (1994). Leadership challenges for metropolitan universities: Issues and approaches. Metropolitan Universities, 5(3), 19–31.
  • Johnson, D. (1999). Metropolitan universities: An emerging model in higher education. International Journal of Innovative Higher Education, 13, 36–41.
  • Johnson, R., & Wamser, C. (1997). Respecting diverse scholarly work: The key to advancing the multiple missions of the urban university. Metropolitan Universities, 7(4), 43–59.
  • Johnsrud, L., & Rosser, V. (2002). Faculty members' morale and their intention to leave: A multilevel explanation. Journal of Higher Education, 73(4), 518–542.
  • Kahn, R., Wolfe, D., Quinn, R., & Snoek, D. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York: John Wiley.
  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
  • Kim, S., Price, J., Mueller, C., & Watson, T. (1996). The determinants of career intent among physicians at a US Air Force hospital. Human Relations, 49(1), 947–976.
  • Kingston-Mann, E., & Sieber, T. (Eds.). (2001). Achieving against the odds: How academics become teachers of diverse students. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Lawler, E. (1994). Motivation in work organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Lee, T., & Mowday, R. (1987). Voluntarily leaving an organization: An empirical investigation of Steers and Mowday's model of turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 30(4), 721–743.
  • Lincoln, J., & Kalleberg, A. (1990). Culture, control, and commitment: A study of work organization and work attitudes in the United States and Japan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lindholm, J. (2003). Perceived organizational fit: Nurturing the minds, hearts, and personal ambitions of university faculty. Review of Higher Education, 27(1), 125–149.
  • Lindholm, J., Astin, A., Sax, L., & Korn, W. (2002). The American college teacher: National norms for the 2001–02 HERI faculty survey. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, University of California Los Angeles.
  • Lynton, E. (1991). The mission of metropolitan universities in the utilization of knowledge: A policy analysis (Working paper #8). Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts at Boston, New England Resource Center for Higher Education.
  • Lynton, E. (1995). Making the case for professional service. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
  • Lynton, E. (1996). Reversing the telescope: Viewing individual activities within a collective context. Metropolitan Universities, 7(3), 41–55.
  • Manger, T., & Eikeland, O. (1990). Factors predicting staff's intentions to leave the university. Higher Education, 19(3), 281–291.
  • Martin, C., & Bennett, N. (1996). The role of justice judgments in explaining the relationship between job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Group and Organizational Management, 21(1), 84–104.
  • Martin, T. (1979). A contextual model of employee turnover intentions. Academy of Management Journal, 22(2), 313–324.
  • Matier, M. (1990). Retaining faculty: A tale of two campuses. Research in Higher Education, 31(1), 39–60.
  • Mazzoli, A. (2000). Faculty perceptions of influences on the curriculum in higher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 459635)
  • McCallum, C. (1994). The bottom line: Broadening the faculty reward system. Teachers College Record, 95(3), 332–336.
  • McMahon, J., & Caret, R. (1997). Redesigning the faculty roles and rewards structure. Metropolitan Universities, 7(4), 11–22.
  • Millett, J. (1962). The academic community: An essay on organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Mobley, W. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 237–240.
  • Mobley, W. (1982). Employee turnover: Causes, consequences, and control. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Mobley, W., Griffeth, R., Hand, H., & Meglino, B. (1979). Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychology Bulletin, 86(3), 493–522.
  • Mowday, R., Porter, L., & Steers, R. (1982). Employee-organization linkages. New York: Academic Press.
  • Mueller, C., Boyer, E., Price, J., & Iverson, R. (1994). Employee attachment and noncoercive conditions of work: The case of dental hygienists. Work and Occupations, 20, 179–212.
  • Mueller, C., & Price, J. (1990). Economic, psychological, and sociological determinants of voluntary turnover. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19(3), 321–336.
  • Mundt, M. (1998). The urban university: An opportunity for renewal in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 22(3), 251–264.
  • Murray, J. (Ed.). (2001). American universities and colleges (16th ed., vol. 2). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
  • National Center for Education Statistics (2001). Institutional policies and practices: Results from the 1999 National Study of Postsecondary Faculty, Institution Survey (NCES 2001–201). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
  • Neumann, Y., & Finaly-Neumann, E. (1990). The reward-support framework and faculty commitment to their university. Research in Higher Education, 31(1), 75–97.
  • O'Meara, K. (2002). Uncovering the values in faculty evaluation of service as scholarship. Review of Higher Education, 26(1), 57–80.
  • O'Reilly, C., & Roberts, K. (1976). Relationships among components of credibility and communication behaviors in work units. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 99–102.
  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Pollicino, E. (1996, April). Faculty satisfaction with institutional support as a complex concept: Collegiality, workload, and autonomy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
  • Porter, L., & Lawler, E. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
  • Porter, L., Steers, R., Mowday, R., & Boulian, P. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603–609.
  • Price, J. (1977). The study of turnover. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
  • Price, J. (1997). Handbook of organizational measurement. International Journal of Manpower, 18(4/5/6), 303–558.
  • Price, J., & Mueller, C. (1981). Professional turnover: The case of nurses. New York: Spectrum.
  • Price, J., & Mueller, C. (1986). Handbook of organizational measurement. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
  • Ramaley, J. (1996). Large-scale institutional change to implement an urban university mission: Portland State University. Journal of Urban Affairs, 18(2), 139–152.
  • Rice, R. E., Sorcinelli, M. D., & Austin, A. (2000). Heeding new voices: Academic careers for a new generation (Working Paper Series, Inquiry #7). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education, New Pathways Project, Forum on Faculty Roles & Rewards.
  • Rizzo, J., House, R., & Lirtzman, S. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 150–163.
  • Rogers, E., & Kincaid, D. (1981). Communication networks: Toward a new paradigm for research. New York: Free Press.
  • Rosser, V. (2004). Faculty members' intentions to leave: A national study on their work-life and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 45(3), 285–309.
  • Sabloff, P. (1997). Another reason why state legislatures will continue to restrict public university autonomy. Review of Higher Education, 20(2), 141–162.
  • Sanderson, A., Phua, V., & Herda, D. (2000). The American faculty poll. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
  • Sax, L., Hagedorn, L., Arredondo, M., & DiCrisi, F. (2002). Faculty research productivity: Exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in Higher Education, 43(4), 423–446.
  • Scott, C., Connaughton, S., Diaz-Saenz, H., Maguire, K., Ramirez, R., Richardson, B., Pride-Shaw, S., & Morgan, D. (1999). The impact of communication and multiple identification on intent to leave. Management Communication Quarterly, 12(3), 400–436.
  • Severino, C. (1996). The idea of an urban university: A history and rhetoric of ambivalence and ambiguity. Urban Education, 31, 291–313.
  • Smart, J. (1990). A causal model of faculty turnover intentions. Research in Higher Education, 31(5), 405–424.
  • Spaights, E. (1980). Toward a definition of an urban university. Urban Education, 15(3), 369–374.
  • Spaights, E., & Farrell, W. (1986). The enigma of the urban university. Education, 106(4), 356–361.
  • Spector, P. (1986). Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations, 39, 1005–1016.
  • Steel, R., & Ovalle, N. (1984). A review and meta-analysis of research on the relationship between behavioral intentions and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 673–686.
  • Steers, R., & Mowday, R. (1981). Employee turnover and post-decision accommodation processes. In L. Cummings & B. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior: Vol. 3 (pp. 235–281). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Sweeney, P., & McFarlin, D. (1993). Workers' evaluations of the “end” and the means”: An examination of four models of distributive justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 23–40.
  • Tett, R., & Meyer, J. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 259–294.
  • Tierney, W., & Bensimon, E. (1996). Promotion and tenure: Community and socialization in academe. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Turner, A., & Lawrence, P. (1965). Industrial jobs and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Vroom, V. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
  • Weimer, W. (1985). Why do faculty members leave a university? Research in Higher Education, 23, 270–278.
  • Wilke, P., & Gmelch, W. (1988, April). Toward a comprehensive view of faculty stress in higher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
  • Witt, S., & Lovrich, N. (1988). Sources of stress among faculty: Gender differences. Review of Higher Education, 77(3), 269–284.
  • Wolf-Wendel, L., Twombly, S., & Rice, S. (2000). Dual-career couples: Keeping them together. Journal of Higher Education, 71(3), 291–321.
  • Zhou, Y., & Volkwein, J. (2004). Examining the influences on faculty departure intentions: A comparison of tenured versus nontenured faculty at research universities using NSOPF-99. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 139–176.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.