Proscriptive Norms for Academic Deans: Comparing Faculty Expectations across Institutional and Disciplinary Boundaries

References

• Adams, C. S., & Roberts, S. M. (1991). Construction of role and the shaping of organizational culture: A symbolic interactionalist study of collegiate mid-level managers in student affairs. ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED 339 294.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges. (1996). Renewing the academic presidency: Stronger leadership for tougher times. Washington, DC: AGBUC.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, A. E., & Gamson, Z. F. (1983). Academic workplace: New demands, heightened tensions. Washington, DC: ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Research Report No. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, A. (1990). Faculty cultures, faculty views. In W. Tierney, (Ed.), Assessing academic climates and cultures. New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 68. (pp. 61–74). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bensimon, E. M. (1991). The social processes through which faculty shape the image of a new president. The Journal of Higher Education, 62, 637–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., & Luckman, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell.
   Google Scholar
• Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology 57(3), 195–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, R. (1988). How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, R. (1992). How academic leadership works: Understanding success and failure in the college presidency. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, R. T., & Lawrence, J. H. (1995). Faculty at work: Motivation, expectation, satisfaction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. L. (1990). In search of community. Washington, DC: American Council on Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 319276).
   Google Scholar
• Braxton, J. M., & Bayer, A. E. (1999). Faculty misconduct in collegiate teaching. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braxton, J. M., & Hargens, L. L. (1996). Variation among academic disciplines: Analytical frameworks and research. In: J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: A handbook of theory and research, Vol. XI, pp. 1–46. New York: Agathon.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, N. J. (1999). Social control of administrative impropriety: An analysis of college and university administrators. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, November 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Bright, D. F., & Richards, M. P. (2002). The academic deanship: Individual careers and institutional roles. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, T. I. D., & Slaughter, S. (1999). Faculty and administrators' attitudes toward potential conflicts of interest, commitment, and equity in university—industry relationships. The Journal of Higher Education, 70, 309–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnegie Foundation. (1994). A classification of institutions of higher education: A technical report. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 374 754).
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, P. N., Rothgerber, H., Wood, W., & Matz, D. C. (2004). Social norms and identity relevance: A motivational approach to normative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1295–1309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. D., & March, J. G. (1974). Leadership and ambiguity: The American college president. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, F., & Townsend, B. K. (1992). Faculty perceptions of the department chair's role in facilitating tenure acquisition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Minneapolis, MN. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED 352 912).
   Google Scholar
• Dill, D. D. (1984). The nature of administrative behavior in higher education. Educational Administration Quarterly, 20(3), 69–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1995). The elementary focus of religious life. Trans., K. E. Fields. New York: Free Press. (Original manuscript written 1912).
   Google Scholar
• Eckel, P. D. (2000). The role of shared governance in institutional hard decisions: Enabler or antagonist? The Review of Higher Education 24, 15–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincher, C. (1996). Theory and research in administrative leadership. In J. C. Smart, (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, Vol. XI, 307–336. New York: Agathon.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, Jr., F. J. (1988). Survey research methods. (Revised edition). Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 1. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (1997). Applied regression analysis, linear models, and related methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goode, W. J., & Hatt, P. K. (1952). Methods of social research. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Groner, N. E. (1978). Leadership situations in academic departments: Relations among measures of situational favorableness and control. Research in Higher Education, 8, 125–143.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. C., & Anderson, M. S. (1998). Conflict in academic departments: A longitudinal analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, April, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 206–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempner, K. (2003). The search for cultural leaders. The Review of Higher Education, 26, 363–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kezar, A., & Eckel, P. D. (2004). Meeting today's governance challenges: A synthesis of the literature and examination of a future agenda for scholarship. The Journal of Higher Education, 75, 371–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Mueller, C. W. (1978). Introduction to factor analysis: What it is and how to do it. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07–013. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Krahenbuhl, G. S. (2004). Building the academic deanship. Westport, CT: ACE/Praeger (Greenwood).
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D., & Whitt, E. J. (1988). The invisible tapestry: Culture in American colleges and universities. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Macionis, J. J. (2001). Sociology (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Matczynski, T., Lasley, T. J., & Haberman, M. (1989). The deanship: How faculty evaluate performance. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(6), 10–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1976). The sociology of social problems. In R. K. Merton & R. Nisbet (Eds.), Contemporary social problems (pp. 3–43). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Montez, J. M., Wolverton, M., & Gmelch, W. H. (2003). The roles and challenges of deans. The Review of Higher Education, 26, 241–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, J. (2004). Supporting women and minority faculty. Academe, 90(1), 47–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, A. (1995). On the making of hard times and good times: The social construction of resource stress. The Journal of Higher Education, 66, 3–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruitt, D. A., & Schwartz, R. A. (1999). Student affairs work as boundary-spanning: An exploratory study. College Student Affairs Journal, 19(1), 62–87.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoades, G. (2000). Who's doing it right? Strategic activity in public research universities. The Review of Higher Education, 24, 41–66.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. The Academy of Management Review, 22, 887–910.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, D. (1980). Deans as individuals-in-organizations. In D. E. Griffths & D. J. McCarty (eds.), The dilemma of the deanship (pp. 133–176). Danville, IL: The Interstate Publishers and Printers.
   Google Scholar
• Toma, J. D. (1997). Alternative inquiry paradigms, faculty cultures, and the definition of academic lives. The Journal of Higher Education, 68, p. 679–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, A., & Bryan, R. A. (1991). The academic dean: Dove, dragon, and diplomat. (2nd ed.). New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, D. E. (1981). The president as ethical leader of the campus. In R. H. Stein & M. C. Baca, (Eds.), J. B. L. Hefferlin (Series Ed.). Professional ethics in university administration. New Directions for Higher Education, 9(1), No. 33 (pp. 15–27). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, H. F., & Bowen, B. D. (1977). An introduction to survey research and data analysis. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, J. F., & Metcalf, J. (2003). Faculty and administrative support for institutional effectiveness activities: A bridge across the chasm. The Journal of Higher Education, 74, 445–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whetten, D., A., & Cameron, K. S. (1985). Administrative effectiveness in higher education. Review of Higher Education, 9, 35–49.
   Google Scholar
• Wolverton, M., & Gmelch, G. H. (2002). College deans: Leading from within. Westport, CT: ACE/Oryx (Greenwood).
   Google Scholar
• Wolverton, M., Gmelch, W. H., Montez, J., & Nies, C. T. (2001), The changing nature of the academic deanship. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education report, 28 (1). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Wolverton, M., Wolverton, M. L., & Gmelch, W. H. (2000). The impact of role conflict and ambiguity on academic deans. The Journal of Higher Education, 70, 80–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, H. E. (1988). The sociology of science. In N. J. Smelser (Ed.), Handbook of Sociology, 511–574. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar