The Impacts of Postdoctoral Training on Scientists' Academic Employment

References

• Allison, P., & Long, J. (1990). Departmental effects on scientific productivity. American Sociological Review, 55 (4), 469–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ãkerlind, G. (2005). Postdoctoral researchers: Roles, functions and career prospects. Higher Education Research & Development, 24 (1), 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Association of American Universities (AAU). (1998). Committee on postdoctoral education: Report and recommendations. Retrieved from http://www.aau.edu/reports/Postdocrpt.html
   Google Scholar
• Association of American Universities (AAU). (2005). Postdoc education survey: Summary of results. Graduate and Postdoc Committee. Retrieved from http://www.aau.edu/WorkArea/showcontent.aspx?id=1944&LangType=1033
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, D., Gates, S., & Goldman, C. (2002). In pursuit of prestige: Strategy and competition in U.S. higher education. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Burris, V. (2004). The academic caste system: Prestige hierarchies in PhD exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 69, 239–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemente, F. (1973). Early career determinants of research productivity. American Journal of Sociology, 79 (2), 409–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coggeshall, P., Norvell, J., Bogorad, L., & Bock, R. M. (1978). Changing postdoctoral career patterns for biomedical scientists. Science, 202 (4367), 487–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, R. (1979). The credential society. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP). (2000). Enhancing the postdoctoral experience for scientists and engineers: A guide for postdoctoral scholars, advisers, institutions, funding organizations, and disciplinary societies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corley, E., Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2003). Evaluating the impacts of grants on women scientists' careers: The curriculum vita as a tool for research assessment, In P. Shapira & S. Kuhlmann (Eds.), Learning from science and technology policy evaluation: Experiences from the United States and Europe (pp. 293–315). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Corley, E., & Sabharwal, M. (2007). Foreign-born academic scientists and engineers: Producing more and getting less than their U.S.-born peers? Research in Higher Education, 48 (8), 909–940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, J., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: Industrial experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 34, 349–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, J., Chompalov, I., Bozeman, B., Lane, E., & Park, J. (2000). Using the curriculum vita to study the career paths of scientists and engineers: An exploratory assessment. Scientometrics, 49 (3), 419–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48 (2), 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galor, O., & Moav, O. (2004). From physical to human capital accumulation: Inequality and the process of development. The Review of Economic Studies, 71 (4), 1001–1026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, H., & Gerbi, S. (1998). Education and employment patterns of US PhDs in the biomedical sciences. Faseb Journal, 12 (2), 139–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, H., Gerbi, S., & Kincade, P. (2003). In an era of scientific opportunity, are there opportunities for biomedical scientists? Faseb Journal, 17 (15), 2169–2173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaughan, M., & Bozeman, B. (2002). Using curriculum vitae to compare some impacts of NSF research grants with research center funding. Research Evaluation, 11 (1), 17–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberger, M., Maher, B., & Flattau, P. (Eds.). (1995). Research-doctorate programs in the United States: Continuity and change. Committee for the Study of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6), 1360–1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, L., Lindzey, G., & Coggeshall, P. (Eds.). (1982a). An assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States: Biological sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L., Lindzey, G., & Coggeshall, P. (Eds.). (1982b). An assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States: Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L., Lindzey, G., & Coggeshall, P. (Eds.). (1982c). An assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States: Mathematical and physical sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. (2004) Foreign-born scientists in the United States: Do they perform differently than native-born scientists? Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35 (5), 673–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, S., & Stephen, P. (1991). Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. American Economic Review, 81 (1), 114–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libaers, D. (2007). Roles and contribution of foreign-born scientists and engineers to the public US nano science and technology research enterprise. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54 (3), 423–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, M., & Bozeman, B. (2006). Researchers' industry experience and productivity in university-industry research centers: “A scientific and technical human capital” explanation. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31 (2), 269–290.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J. (1978). Productivity and academic position in the scientific career. American Sociological Review, 43 (6), 889–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J., Allison, P., & McGinnis, R. (1979). Entrance into the academic career. American Sociological Review, 44 (5), 816–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J., & Fox, M. (1995). Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism. Annual Review of Sociology, 21 (1), 45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, S., & McGinnis, R. (1981). Organizational context and scientific productivity. American Sociological Review, 46 (4), 422–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadyen, M., & Cannella, A., Jr. (2004). Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (5), 735–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinnis, R., Allison, P., & Long, J. (1982). Postdoctoral training in bioscience: Allocation and outcomes. Social Forces, 60 (3), 701–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. (1973). The Sociology of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. (1992). Asian-Americans bump against glass ceilings. Science, 258 (5085), 1224–1228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (1969). The invisible university: Postdoctoral education in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (1974). Postdoctoral training in the biomedical sciences. Washington DC: National Academy of Science.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (1976). Research training and career patterns of bioscientists: The training programs of the National Institutes of Health. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (1981). Postdoc appointments and disappointments. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (1998). Trends in the early careers of life scientists. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2005). Bridges to independence: Fostering the independence of new investigators in biomedical research. Board on Life Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board (NSB). (2006). Science and engineering indicators. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2008). Science and engineering indicators. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Nerad, M., & Cerny, J. (1999). Postdoctoral patterns, career advancement, and problems. Science, 285 (5433), 1533–1535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerad, M., & Cerny, J. (2002). Postdoctoral appointments and employment patterns of science and engineering doctoral receipts ten-plus years after PhD completion. Communicator, XXXV (7).
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York: Anchor Day Books.
   Google Scholar
• Reskin, B. (1977). Scientific productivity and the reward structure of science. American Sociological Review, 42 (3), 491–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reskin, B. F. (1976). Sex differences in status attainment in science: The case of the postdoctoral fellowship. American Sociological Review, 41, 597–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roose, K., & Anderson, C. (1970). A rating of graduate programs. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
   Google Scholar
• Seufert, A., Vonkrogh, G., & Bach, A. (1999). Towards knowledge networking. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3 (3), 180–190.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnert, G. (1995). Gender equity in science: Still an elusive goal. Issues in Science & Technology, 12 (2), 53–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, A. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87 (3), 355–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan P., & Levin, S. (2007). Foreign scholars in US science: Contributions and costs. In P. Stephan & R. Ehrenberg (Eds.), Science and the university (pp. 150–173). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, P., & Ma, J. (2005, January). The increased frequency and duration of the postdoctorate career stage. Paper presented at the American Economic Association Conference, Philadelphia, PA. Available at http://www.aeaweb.org/annual_mtg_papers/2005/0108_1430_1204.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, J. (1997). The glass ceiling in science and engineering. Journal of Socio-Economics, 26 (4), 383–406.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, P., & Nagasawa, R. (1991). Asian American scientists and engineers: Is there a glass ceiling for career advancement? Chinese American Forum, 6 (3), 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Zumeta, W. (1984). Anatomy of the boom in postdoctoral appointments during the 1970s: Troubling implications for quality science. Science Technology & Human Values, 9 (2), 23–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zumeta, W. (1985). Extending the educational ladder: The changing roles of postdoctoral education in the United States. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.
   Google Scholar