Understanding the Writing Habits of Tomorrow's Students: Technology and College Readiness

References

• Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Attewell, P., Domina, T., Lavin, D. E., & Levey, T. (2006). New evidence on college remediation. The Journal of Higher Education, 77 (5), 886–924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aud, S., Hussar, W., Kena, G., Bianco, K., Frohlich, L., Kemp, J., & Tahan, K. (2011). The condition of education 2011 (NCES 2011–033). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bahr, P. R. (2010). Revisiting the efficacy of postsecondary remediation: The moderating effects of depth/breadth of deficiency. The Review of Higher Education, 33 (2), 177–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y. A., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58 (1), 33–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellard, E. M. (2005). Information literacy needs of nontraditional graduate students in social work. Research Strategies, 20 (4), 494–505.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39 (5), 775–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 13 (1), 210–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D. (2006). Defining digital literacy. What do young people need to know about digital media. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 4 (1), 263–276.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D. (2008). Introducing identity. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 1–24). Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2010). College enrollment and work activity of 2009 high school graduates. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, N. (2008). Is Google making us stupid? Why you can't read the way you used to. Atlantic Monthly, 302 (1), 56–63.
   Google Scholar
• Carrell, P. L. (1982). Cohesion is not coherence. TESOL Quarterly, 16 (4), 479–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazden, C., Cope, B., Fairclough, N., Gee, J., Kalantzis, M., Kress, G., … Nakata, M. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66 (1), 60–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. (2008). Handbook of research on new literacies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dimaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W. R., & Robinson, J. P. (2001). Social implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology, 307–336.
   Google Scholar
• Döring, N. (2002). Personal home pages on the web: A review of research. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 7 (3). Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2002.tb00152.x/full
   Google Scholar
• Dziuban, C., Moskal, P., & Hartman, J. (2005). Higher education, blended learning and the generations: Knowledge is power—no more. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education: Engaging communities (pp. 85–100). Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education.
   Google Scholar
• Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13 (1), 93.
   Google Scholar
• Fairlie, R. W., Beltran, D. O., & Das, K. K. (2010). Home computers and educational outcomes: Evidence from the NLSY97 and CPS. Economic Inquiry, 48 (3), 771–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Luna, J. M., Huete, J. F., MacFarlane, A., & Efthimiadis, E. N. (2009). Teaching and learning in information retrieval. Information Retrieval, 12 (2), 201–226.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. (2000). Teenagers in new times: A new literacy studies perspective. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 412–420.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Goode, J. (2010). Mind the gap: The digital dimension of college access. The Journal of Higher Education, 81 (5), 583–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age. Educational Researcher, 38 (4), 246–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K., Morales, P. Z., & Martinez, D. C. (2009). Re-mediating literacy: Culture, difference, and learning for students from nondominant communities. Review of Research in Education, 33 (1), 212–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, W., De Roure, D., & Shadbolt, N. (2009). The evolution of the web and implications for eresearch. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 367 (1890), 991.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation.” Sociological Inquiry, 80 (1), 92–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocks, M. E. (2003). Understanding visual rhetoric in digital writing environments. College Composition and Communication, 54 (4), 629–656.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., Horst, H. A., … Pascoe, C. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S., Johnson-Yale, C., Millermaier, S., & Pérez, F. S. (2009). U.S. college students' Internet use: Race, gender and digital divides. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14 (2), 244–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminski, K., Switzer, J., & Gloeckner, G. (2009). Workforce readiness: A study of university students' fluency with information technology. Computers & Education, 53 (2), 228–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2004). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. The Communication Review, 7 (1), 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, P. R., & White, J. W. (2010). Minority college students and tacit “codes of power”: Developing academic discourses and identities. The Review of Higher Education, 34 (2), 283–318.
   Google Scholar
• Luckin, R., Clark, W., Graber, R., Logan, K., Mee, A., & Oliver, M. (2009). Do web 2.0 tools really open the door to learning? Practices, perceptions and profiles of 11–16-year-old students. Learning, Media and Technology, 34 (2), 87–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcilroy, D., Sadler, C., & Boojawon, N. (2007). Computer phobia and computer self-efficacy: Their association with undergraduates' use of university computer facilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 23 (3), 1285–1299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58 (1), 9–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1967). The medium is the massage: An inventory of effects. Berkeley, CA: Gingko Press.
   Google Scholar
• Messaris, P. (1998). Visual aspects of media literacy. Journal of Communication, 48 (1), 70–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, K. A. (2010). A review of the “digital turn” in the new literacy studies. Review of Educational Research, 80 (2), 246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (1998). Ethical issues raised by students' personal writing. College English, 60 (3), 318–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasah, A., DaCosta, B., Kinsell, C., & Seok, S. (2010). The digital literacy debate: An investigation of digital propensity and information and communication technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58 (5), 531–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M., Hull, G. A., & Roche-Smith, J. (2008). Challenges of multimedia self-presentation: Taking, and mistaking, the show on the road. Written Communication, 25 (4), 415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, D. G. (1998). Multiple literacies in a high-school program for “at-risk” adolescents. In D. Alvermann (Ed.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents' lives (pp. 27–49). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (2008). Self-efficacy beliefs and motivation in writing development. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 158–170). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riffaterre, M. (1994). Intertextuality vs. hypertextuality. New Literary History, 25 (4), 779–788.
   Google Scholar
• Robison, A. (2008). The design is the game: Writing games, teaching writing. Computers and Composition, 25 (3), 359–370.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2007). The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: A critical perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23 (2), 83–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slattery, P. J. (2010). The argumentative, multiple-source paper: College students reading, thinking and writing about divergent points of view. Journal of Teaching Writing, 10 (2), 181–200.
   Google Scholar
• Spiro, R. J., Feltovitch, P. L., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology, 31, 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, S. (2008). Producing sites, exploring identities: Youth online authorship. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 95–117). Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strano, M. M. (2008). User descriptions and interpretations of self-presentation through facebook profile images. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 2 (2), 5.
   Google Scholar
• Strayhorn, T. L. (2011). Bridging the pipeline: Increasing underrepresented students' preparation for college through a summer bridge program. American Behavioral Scientist, 55 (2), 142–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street, B. (1998). New literacies in theory and practice: What are the implications for language in education? Linguistics and Education, 10 (1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Trappes-Lomax, H. (2004). Discourse analysis. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 133–164). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (2008). Always-on/always-on-you: The tethered self. In J. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 121–137). Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Upton, T. A., & Cohen, M. A. (2009). An approach to corpus-based discourse analysis: The move analysis as example. Discourse Studies, 11 (5), 585–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Deursen, A. J., Van Dijk, J. A., & Peters, O. (2011). Rethinking Internet skills: The contribution of gender, age, education, Internet experience, and hours online to medium-and content-related Internet skills. Poetics, 39 (2), 125–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vie, S. (2008). Digital divide 2.0. Computers and Composition, 25 (1), 9–23.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, K. (2000). “It's difficult to hide it”: The presentation of self on Internet home pages. Qualitative Sociology, 23 (1), 99–120.
   Google Scholar
• Walpole, M. B. (2003). Socioeconomic status and college: How SES affects college experiences and outcomes. Review of Higher Education, 27 (1), 45–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34 (1), 179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar