445
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Academic Momentum at University/College: Exploring the Roles of Prior Learning, Life Experience, and Ongoing Performance in Academic Achievement across Time

Pages 640-674 | Published online: 31 Oct 2016

References

  • Adelman, C. (1999). Answers in the toolbox: Academic intensity, attendance patterns and bachelor's degree attainment. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/pubs/Toolbox/index.html
  • Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/toolboxrevisit/toolbox.pdf
  • Archer, J., Cantwell, R., & Bourke, S. (1999). Coping at university: An examination of achievement, motivation, self-regulation, confidence, and method of entry. Higher Education Research and Development, 18, 31–54.
  • Attewell, P., Heil, S., & Reisel, L. (2012). What is academic momentum? And does it matter? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34, 27–44.
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006). Research paper: Socio-economic indexes for areas. Canberra: ABS.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  • Betts, J. R., & Morell, D. (1999). The determinants of undergraduate grade point average: The relative importance of family background. The Journal of Human Resources, 34, 268–293.
  • Birch, E. B., & Miller, P. W. (2007). The characteristics of “gap-year” students and their tertiary academic outcomes. The Economic Record, 83, 329–344.
  • Bridgeman, B., & Wendler, C. (1991). Gender differences in predictors of college mathematics performance and in mathematics course grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 275–284.
  • Brown, P., & Hesketh, A. (2004). The mismanagement of talent: Employability and jobs in the knowledge economy. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Brown, R. L. (1994). Efficiency of the indirect approach for estimating structural equation models with missing data: A comparison of five methods. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 287–316.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge.
  • Cabrera, A. F., Crissman, J. L., Bernal, E. M., Nora, M., Terenzini, P. T., & Pascarella, E. T. (2002). Collaborative learning: Its impact on college students' development and diversity. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 20–34.
  • Cantwell, R., Archer, J., & Bourke, S. (2001). A comparison of the academic experiences and achievement of university students entering by traditional and non-traditional means. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, 221–234.
  • Chee, K. H., Pino, N. W., & Smith, W. L. (2005). Gender differences in the academic ethic and academic achievement. College Student Journal, 39, 604–618.
  • Clewell, B. C., & Campbell, P. B. (2002). Taking stock: Where we've been, where we are, where we're going. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8, 255–284.
  • Corno, L., & Snow, R. E. (1986). Adapting teaching to individual differences among learners. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 605–629). New York: MacMillan Publishing Co.
  • Credé, M., & Kuncel, N. R. (2008). Study habits, skills and attitudes: The third pillar supporting collegiate academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 425–453.
  • Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods. New York: Irvington.
  • Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (2012). Summary of the 2010 higher education student statistics. Retrieved from http://www.deewr.gov.au/HigherEducation/Publications/HEStatistics/Publications/Pages/Home.aspx
  • Dobson, I. R., & Skuja, E. (2005). Secondary schooling, tertiary entry ranks and university performance. People and Place, 13, 53–62.
  • Goldstein, H. (2005). Multilevel statistical models. London: Hodder Arnold.
  • Gordon, E. W. (1991). Human diversity and pluralism. Educational Psychologist, 26, 99–108.
  • Graham, J. W., & Hoffer, S. M. (2000). Multiple imputation in multivariate research. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnable, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples (pp. 201–218). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Grayson, D. A., Mackinnon, A., Jorm, A. F., Creasey, H., & Broe, G. A. (2000). Item bias in the center for epidemiologic studies depression scales: Effects of physical disorders and disability in elderly community sample. Journal of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 5, 273–282.
  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
  • Heath, S. (2007). Widening the gap: Pre-university gap years and the “economy of experience.” British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28, 89–103.
  • Heck, R. H., & Thomas, S. L. (2008). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
  • Horn, L., & Berger, R. (2004). College persistence on the rise? Changes in 5-year degree completion and postsecondary persistence rates between 1995 and 2000 (NCES 2005–156). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education.
  • Horn, L., Cataldi, E. F., & Sikora, A. (2005). Waiting to attend college: Undergraduates who delay their postsecondary enrollment (NCES 2005–152). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education
  • Hoskins, S., Newstead, S., & Dennis, I. (1997). Degree performance as a function of age, gender, prior qualifications and discipline studied. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22, 317–328.
  • Hox, J. (1998). Multilevel modeling: When and why? In I. Balderjahn, R. Mathar, & M. Schader (Eds.), Classification, data analysis, and data highways (pp. 147–154). New York: Springer Verlag.
  • Hyde, J. S., & Kling K. C. (2001). Women, motivation, and achievement. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 364–378
  • James, R. (2002). Socioeconomic background and higher education participation: An analysis of school students' aspirations and expectations. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
  • Kaplan, D. (2000. Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Kember, D. (1999). Integrating part-time study with family, work and social obligations. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 109–124.
  • Kember, D. (2001). Beliefs about knowledge and the process of teaching and learning as a factor in adjusting to study in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 26, 205–221.
  • Kernan, W. N., Viscoli, C. M., Makuch, R. W., Brass, L. M., & Horwitz, R. I. (1998). Stratified randomization for clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 52, 19–26.
  • Krause, K., Hartley, R., James, R., & McInnis, C. (2005). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from a decade of national studies. Canberra: Australian Department of Education, Science and Training.
  • Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.
  • Lohr, S. L. (2008). Coverage and sample. In E. D. de Leeuw, J. J. Hox, & D. A. Dillman (Eds). International handbook of survey methodology (pp. 97–112). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201–226.
  • Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & Hau, K. T. (1996). An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling techniques (pp. 315–353). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 391–410.
  • Marsh, H. W., Ginns, P., Morin, A. J. S., Nagengast, B., & Martin, A. J. (2011). Use of student ratings to benchmark universities: Multilevel modeling of responses to the Australian Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ). Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 733–748.
  • Marsh, H. W., & O'Mara, A. (2008). Reciprocal effects between academic self-concept, self-esteem, achievement, and attainment over seven adolescent years. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 34, 542–552.
  • Marsh, H. W., Rowe, K., Martin, A. J. (2002). PhD students' evaluations of research supervision: Issues, complexities and challenges in a nationwide Australian experiment in benchmarking universities. Journal of Higher Education, 73, 313–348.
  • Martens, M. P., & Haase, R. F. (2006) Advanced applications of structural equation in counseling psychology research. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 878–911
  • Martin, A. J. (2010). Should students have a gap year? Motivation and performance factors relevant to time out after completing school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 561–576.
  • Martin, A. J. (2011). Prescriptive statements and educational practice: What can structural equation modeling (SEM) offer? Educational Psychology Review, 23, 235–244.
  • McDonald, R. P., & Marsh, H. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 247–255.
  • McKenzie, K., & Gow, K. (2009). Exploring the first year academic achievement of school leavers and mature-age students through structural equation modeling. Learning and Individual Differences, 14, 107–123.
  • Menard, S. (1991). Longitudinal research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
  • Muthén, B. O. (1997). Latent variable modeling of longitudinal and multilevel data. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). Mini-digest of education statistics, 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  • Nelson Laird, T. F., & Cruce, T. M. (2009). Individual and environmental effects of part-time enrollment status on student-faculty interaction and self-reported gains. Journal of Higher Education, 80, 290–314.
  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affect students, volume 2: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Porter, S. R. (2006). What can multilevel models add to institutional research? In M. A. Coughlin (Ed.), Applications of intermediate/advanced statistics in institutional research (Resources in Institutional Research, no. 16, pp. 110–131). Tallahassee, FL: Association for Institutional Research.
  • Rasbash, J., Steele, F., Browne, W., & Prosser, B. (2005). A user's guide to MLwiN version 2.0. University of Bristol, UK.
  • Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 353–387.
  • Roksa, J., & Velez, M. (2012). A late start: Delayed entry, life course transitions, and bachelor's degree completion. Social Forces, 90 (3), 769–794. doi: 10.1093/sf/sor018
  • Schmitt, N. (2012). Development of rationale and measures of non-cognitive college student potential. Educational Psychologist, 47, 18–29.
  • Schmitt, N., Keeney, J., Oswald, F. L., Pleskac, T. J., Billington, A. Q., Sinha, R., & Zorie, M. (2009). Prediction of 4-year college student performance using cognitive and non-cognitive predictors and the impact on demographic status of admitted students. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1479–1497.
  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research 1990–2000. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417–453.
  • Smith, J., & Naylor, R. (2001). Determinants of degree performance in UK universities: A statistical analysis of the 1993 student cohort. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63, 29–60.
  • Stemler, S. E. (2012). What should university admissions tests predict? Educational Psychologist, 47, 5–17.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
  • Tanaka, J. S., & Huba, G. J. (1989). A general coefficient of determination for covariance structure models under arbitrary GLS estimation. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42, 233–239.
  • Thomas, S. L., & Heck, R. H. (2001). Analysis of large-scale secondary data in higher education research: Potential perils associated with complex sampling designs. Research in Higher Education, 42, 517–540.
  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Tobias, S. (1989). Another look at research on the adaptation of instruction to student characteristics. Educational Psychologist, 24, 213–227.
  • Tobias, S. (2003). Extending Snow's conceptions of aptitudes. Contemporary Psychology, 48, 277–279.
  • Tobias, S. (2010). Generative learning theory, paradigm shifts, and constructivism in educational psychology: A tribute to Merl Wittrock. Educational Psychologist, 45, 51–54.
  • Van Etten, S., Pressley, M., McInerney, D. M., & Liem, A. D. (2008) College seniors' theory of their academic motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 812–828.
  • Vignoles, A. F., & Powdthavee, N. (2009). The socioeconomic gap in university dropouts. The B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 9, 19–39.
  • Win, R., & Miller, P. W. (2005). The effects of individual and school factors on university students' academic performance. The Australian Economic Review, 38, 1–18.
  • Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist, 11, 87–95.
  • Wittrock, M. C. (1990). Generative process of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24, 345–376.
  • Wittrock, M. C. (1992). Generative learning processes of the brain. Educational Psychologist, 27, 531–541.
  • Wittrock, M. C. (2010). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist, 45, 40–45. (Reprinted from Educational Psychologist, 11, 87–95, 1974)
  • Zell, E., & Alicke, M. D. (2009). Contextual neglect, self-evaluation, and the frog-pond effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 467–482.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.