77
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Rank Advancement in Academia: What are the Roles of Postdoctoral Training?

References

  • American Association of University Professors. (1940). 1940 statement of principles on academic freedom and tenure. Retrieved from http://www.aaup.org/file/principles-academic-freedom-tenure.pdf
  • American Association of University Professors. (2003). Contingent appointments and the academic profession. Retrieved from http://www.aaup.org/file/contingent-appointment.pdf
  • Association of American Universities. (1998). Report and recommendations. Washington, DC: Association of American Universities, Committee on Postdoctoral Education.
  • Association of American Universities. (2005). Postdoctoral education: Survey summary of results. Washington, DC: Association of American Universities, Graduate and Postdoctoral Education Committee.
  • Blossfeld, H.-P., Hamerle, A., & Mayer, K. U. (1989). Event history analysis: Statistical theory and application in the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
  • Blossfeld, H.-P., & Rohwer, G. T. (1995). Techniques of event history modeling: New approaches to causal analysis. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
  • Bowen, L. G. (1953). Subsequent careers of applicants for postdoctoral medical research fellowships. Journal of the American Medical Association, 152 (8), 693–697. doi: 10.1001/jama.1953.03690080037011
  • Bozeman, B., Dietz, J. S., & Gaughan, M. (2001). Scientific and technical human capital: An alternative model for research evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management, 22 (7–8), 716–740.
  • Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2007). Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers' interactions with industry. Research Policy, 36 (5), 694–707. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.007
  • Bozeman, B., & Mangematin, V. (2004). Editor's introduction: Building and deploying scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33 (4), 565–568.
  • Burris, V. (2004). The academic caste system: Prestige hierarchies in phd exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 69 (2), 239–264. doi: 10.1177/000312240406900205
  • Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2000). Classification of higher education. Retrieved from http://www.aaup.org/file/contingent-appointment.pdf
  • Clemente, F. (1973). Early career determinants of research productivity. The American Journal of Sociology, 79 (2), 409–419.
  • Davis, G. (2006). Improving the postdoctoral experience: An empirical approach. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/∼sewp/Davis_SurveyAnalysis20060201.pdf
  • Dietz, J., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: Industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 34 (3), 349–367.
  • Dietz, J., Chompalov, I., Bozeman, B., Lane, E., & Park, J. (2000). Using the curriculum vita to study the career paths of scientists and engineers: An exploratory assessment. Scientometrics, 49 (3), 419–442.
  • Fox, M., & Colatrella, C. (2006). Participation, performance, and advancement of women in academic science and engineering: What is at issue and why. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31 (3), 377–386.
  • Garrison, H., & Gerbi, S. (1998). Education and employment patterns of U.S. Ph.D.'s in the biomedical sciences. The FASEB Journal, 12 (2), 139–148.
  • Garrison, H., Gerbi, S., & Kincade, P. (2003). In an era of scientific opportunity, are there opportunities for biomedical scientists? FASEB J, 17 (15), 2169–2173. doi: 10.1096/fj.03–0836life
  • Gaughan, M. (2009). Using the curriculum vitae for policy research: An evaluation of National Institutes of Health center and training support on career trajectories. Research Evaluation 18 (2), 117–124.
  • Gaughan, M., & Bozeman, B. (2002). Using curriculum vitae to compare some impacts of NSF research grants with research center funding. Research Evaluation, 11 (1), 17–26.
  • Gaughan, M., & Ponomariov, B. (2008). Faculty publication productivity, collaboration, and grants velocity: Using curricula vitae to compare center-affiliated scientists and unaffiliated scientists. Research Evaluation, 17 (2), 103–110.
  • Goldberger, M. L., Maher, B. A., & Flattau, P. E. (1995). Research-doctorate programs in the United States: Continuity and change. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6), 1360–1380.
  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3), 481–510.
  • Holtom, B. C., Mitchell, T. R., & Lee, T. W. (2006). Increasing human and social capital by applying job embeddedness theory. Organizational Dynamics, 35 (4), 316–331. doi: DOI 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2006.08.007
  • Jones, L. V., Lindzey, G., & Coggeshall, P. E. (1982a). An assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States—mathematical & physical sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Jones, L. V., Lindzey, G., & Coggeshall, P. E. (1982b). An assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States—biological sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Jones, L. V., Lindzey, G., & Coggeshall, P. E. (1982c). An assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States—engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., Sablynski, C. J., Burton, J. P., & Holtom, B. C. (2004). The effects of job embeddedness on organizational citizenship, job performance, volitional absences, and voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (5), 711–722.
  • Lin, M.-W., & Bozeman, B. (2006). Researchers' industry experience and productivity in university–industry research centers: A “scientific and technical human capital” explanation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31 (2), 269–290.
  • Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., & Bozeman, B. (2007). An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16 (4), 641–655.
  • Long, J. S. (1978). Productivity and academic position in the scientific career. American Sociological Review, 43 (6), 889–908.
  • Long, J. S., Allison, P. D., & McGinnis, R. (1979). Entrance into the academic career. American Sociological Review, 44 (5), 816–830.
  • Long, J. S., Allison, P. D., & McGinnis, R. (1993). Rank advancement in academic careers: Sex differences and the effects of productivity. American Sociological Review, 58 (5), 703–722.
  • Long, J. S., & Fox, M. F. (1995). Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism. Annual Review of Sociology, 21 (1), 45.
  • Marshall, L., & Woods, S. (1980). Relationship of research postdoctoral experience and attainment of tenure by neuroscientists. Experimental Neurology, 68 (3), 403–408.
  • McGinnis, R., Allison, P. D., & Long, J. S. (1982). Postdoctoral training in bioscience: Allocation and outcomes. Social Forces, 60 (3), 701–722.
  • Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159 (3810), 56–63.
  • Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Merton, R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis, 79 (4), 606–623.
  • Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (6), 1102–1121.
  • Mitchell, T. R., & Lee, T. W. (2001). The unfolding model of voluntary turnover and job embeddedness: Foundations for a comprehensive theory of attachment. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23 (23), 189–246.
  • National Research Council. (1969). The invisible university: Postdoctoral education in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
  • National Research Council. (1974). Postdoctoral training in the biomedical sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
  • National Research Council. (1976). Research training and career patterns of bioscientists: The training programs of the National Institute of Health. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science.
  • National Research Council. (1981). Postdoctoral appointments and disappointments. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. (1998). Trends in the early careers of life scientists. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. (2001). From scarcity to visibility: Gender differences in the careers of doctoral scientists and engineers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. (2005). Bridges to independence: Fostering the independence of new investiagtors in biomedical research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • National Science Board. (2006). Science and engineering indicators. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
  • National Science Board. (2008). Science and engineering indicators. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
  • National Science Foundation. (2011). Graduate students and postdoctorates in science and engineering: Fall 2008. Arlington, VA: Author.
  • Nerad, M., & Cerny, J. (1999). Postdoctoral patterns, career advancement, and problems (cover story). Science, 285 (5433), 1533.
  • Nerad, M., & Cerny, J. (2002). Postdoctoral appointments and employment: Patterns of science and engineering doctoral recipients ten-plus years after Ph.D. completion. Communicator, 25 (7), 1–2 and 10–11.
  • Polanyi, M., & Sen, A. (2009). The tacit dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Roose, K. D., & Anderson, C. J. (1970). A rating of graduate programs. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
  • Rosser, S. V. (2004). The science glass ceiling: Academic women scientists and the struggle to succeed. New York: Routledge.
  • Siow, A. (1998). Tenure and other unusual personnel practices in academia. Journal of Law Economics & Organization, 14 (1), 152–173.
  • Smith-Doerr, L. (2004). Women's work: Gender equity vs. hierachy in the life sciences. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
  • Sonnert, G. (1995). Gender equity in science: Still an elusive goal. Issues in Science & Technology, 12 (2), 53.
  • Stephan, P., & Ma, J. (2005, May). The increased frequency and duration of the postdoctorate career stage. The American Economic Review, 95 (2), 71–75. Papers and Proceedings of the One Hundred Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Su, X. (2011). Postdoctoral training, departmental prestige and scientists' research productivity. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36 (3), 275–291. doi: 10.1007/s10961–009–9133–3
  • Toren, N. (1993). The temporal dimension of gender inequality in academia. Higher Education, 25 (4), 439–455.
  • Wenneras, C., & Wold, A. (1997). Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature, 387 (6631), 341–343.
  • Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (1998). Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review, 63 (6), 847–870.
  • Youn, T. I. K., & Price, T. M. (2009). Learning from the experience of others: The evolution of faculty tenure and promotion rules in comprehensive institutions. The Journal of Higher Education, 80 (2), 204–237.
  • Zumeta, W. (1984). Anatomy of the boom in postdoctoral appointments during the 1970s—Troubling implications for quality science? Science Technology & Human Values, 9 (2) 23–37.
  • Zumeta, W. (1985). Extending the educational ladder: The changing quality and value of postdoctoral study. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.