Higher Education Change and Social Networks: A Review of Research

References

• Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks: Structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45 (3), 425–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atteberry, A., & Bryk, A. (2010). Centrality, connection, and commitment: The role of social networks in a school based literacy initiative. In A. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory (pp. 51–76). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balconi, M., & Laboranti, A. (2006). University-industry interactions in applied research: The case of microelectronics. Research Policy, 35 (10), 1616–1630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldridge, J. V., Curtis, D. V., Ecker, G. P., & Riley, G. L. (1977). Alternative models of governance in higher education. In G. L. Riley & J. V. Baldridge (Eds.), Governing academic organizations. Berkley: McCutchan.
   Google Scholar
• Balkundi, P., & Harrison, D. (2006). Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about network structures effects on team viability and performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 49 (1), 49–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berquist, W. (2007). The six cultures of the academy. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Biddix, J. P., & Park, H. W. (2008). Online networks of student protest: The case of the living wage campaign. New Media & Society, 10 (6), 871–891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, R. (1988). How colleges work. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S., & Cross, R. (2003). A relationship view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49 (4), 432–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S., & Foster, P. (2003). The new paradigm of organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29 (6), 991–1013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002) Trust in schools: A core resource for school improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Burgan, M. (2006). What happened to faculty governance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: The structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. (2000). The network structure of social capital. In R. Sutton & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 1–83), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. R. (1983). The contradictions of change in academic systems. Higher Education, 12 (1), 101–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C., Choi, L., & Matta, W. (2010). “I would go to her because her mind is math”: Network formation in the context of a district based mathematics reform. In A. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory (pp. 33–51). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C., & Russell, J. (2008). District policy and teachers' social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30 (3), 203–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, R., & Weinbaum, E. (2010). Change in attitude: Peer influence in high school reform. In A. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory (pp. 77–96). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, R., & Parker, A. (2004). The hidden power of social networks: Understanding how work really gets done in organization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, N. (2008). Social networks and student activism: On the politicising effect of campus connections. The Sociological Review, 56 (1), 18–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, A. (2010a). Mapping the terrain: Social network theory and educational change. In A. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory (pp. 1–17). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, A. (2010b). Surveying the terrain ahead: Social network theory and educational change. In A. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory (pp. 259–274). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, A. (Ed.). (2010c). Social network theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, A., & Finnigan, K. (2008). A bridge between worlds: Understanding network structure to understand change strategy. Journal of Educational Change, 11 (2), 111–138.
   Google Scholar
• Fairweather, J. (2009). Linking evidence and promising practices in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate education. Paper for the National academies National Research Council board of Science Education.
   Google Scholar
• Finnigan K., & Daly, A. (2010). Learning at a system level: Ties between principals of low-performing schools and central office leaders. In A. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory (pp. 179–196). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freemen, C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., Schultz, M., & Corley, K. G. (2000). Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. The Academy of Management Journal, 25 (1), 63–81.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., & Thomas, J. B. (1996). Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sense-making during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 370–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granvetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, M. (2009a) Reclaiming the democratic purpose of american higher education: Tracing the trajectory of the civic engagement movement. Learning and Teaching, 2 (3), 11–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, M. (2009b). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal of Change Management, 9 (3), 323–338.
   Google Scholar
• Heck, R., Price, C., & Thomas, S. (2004). Tracks as emergent structures: A network analysis of student differentiation in a high school. American Journal of Education, 110 (4), 321–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, M. (2006). Street level bureaucracy revisited: Frontline district central office administrators as boundary spanners in education policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28 (4), 357–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, G. (1983). Shaping an academic strategy. In G. Keller (Ed.), Academic strategy: The management revolution in American higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kezar, A. (2001). Understanding and facilitating organizational change in the 21^st Century: Recent research and conceptualizations. Washington, DC: ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.
   Google Scholar
• Kezar, A. (2005). Redesigning for collaboration with higher education institutions: An exploration into the developmental process. Research in Higher Education, 46 (7), 831–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kezar, A., & Lester, J. (2009). Organizing for collaboration in higher education: A guide for campus leaders. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kezar, A., & Lester, J. (2011). Enhancing campus capacity for leadership: An examination of grassroots leaders. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kezar, A., & Sam, C. (2010). Understanding the new majority: Contingent faculty in higher education (Vol. I). ASHE Higher Education Report Series. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kilduff, M., & Krackhardt, D. (2008). Interpersonal networks in organizations: Cognition, personality, dynamics, and culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity and learning. Organization Science, 7 (5), 502–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraatz, M. (1998). Learning by association? Interorganizational networks and adaptation to environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (6), 621–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larivire, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, É. (2006). Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics, 68 (3), 519–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linton, F. (2006). The development of social network analysis. Vancouver, BC: Empirical Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lumina Foundation, (2010). Lessons: When networks build a platform students step up. Indianapolis, IN: Lumina Foundation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marion, L. S., Garfield, E., Hargens, L. L., Lievrouw, L. A., White, H. D., & Wilson, C. S. (2003). Social network analysis and citation network analysis: Complementary approaches to the study of scientific communication. Sponsored by SIG MET. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 40 (1), 486–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroulis, S., & Gomez, L. M. (2008). Does “connectedness” matter? Evidence from asocial network analysis within a small school reform. Teachers College Record, 110 (9), 1901–1929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, A., & Puller, S. L. (2008). The old boy (and girl) network: Social network formation on university campuses. Journal of Public Economics, 92 (1), 329–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, C., & Krackhardt, D. (2003). Network conditions for organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39 (3), 304–336.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, G. S. (2008). Mapping the invisible colleges of R&D management. R&D Management, 38 (1), 69–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, A. S. (2006). The corporate partners of higher education associations: A social network analysis. Industry and Innovation, 13 (4), 459–479.
   Google Scholar
• Meyerson, D. (2003). Tempered radicals: How everyday leaders inspire change at work. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mohrman, S., Tenkasi, R., & Micomonaco, J. P., & Austin, A. E. (November, 2010). Examining inter-institutional learning communities: The Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning as a collaboration for institutional learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education (ASHE). Indianapolis, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Mohrman, A. (2003). The role of networks in fundamental organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39 (3), 301–323.
   Google Scholar
• Moody, J., McFarland, D., & Bender-deMoll, S. (2005). Dynamic network visualization. American Journal of Sociology, 110 (4), 1206–1241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, J., & White, D. R. (2003). Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. American Sociological Review, 68 (1), 103–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moolenaar, N., & Sleegers, P. (2010). Social networks, trust, and innovation: The role of relationships in supporting an innovative climate in Dutch schools. In A. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory (pp. 97–114). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, C., & Kochan, F. (2000). Creating a collaborative leadership network: An organic view of change. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 3 (3), 183–200.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. (1989). The strength of strong ties: Social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations. The Academy of Management Journal, 32 (2), 377–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. (1992). Networks in organizations (2nd ed.). Boston: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Otte, E., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: A powerful strategy. Journal of Information Science, 28, 441–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perna, L. W., Rowan-Kenyon, H. T., Thomas, S. L., Bell, A., Anderson, R., & Li, C. (2008). The role of college counseling in shaping college opportunity: Variations across high schools. The Review of Higher Education, 31 (2), 131–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pusser, B., Slaughter, S., & Thomas, S. (2006). Playing the board game: An empirical analysis of university trustee and corporate board interlocks. The Journal of Higher Education, 77 (5), 747–775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of american community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48 (2), 240–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoades, G. (1996). Reorganizing the faculty workforce for flexibility: Part-time professional labor. The Journal of Higher Education, 67 (6), 626–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoades, G., & Slaughter, S. (2004). Academic capitalism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, J. D., Bozeman, B., & Chompalov, I. (2001). Obstacles and opportunities in the application of network analysis to the evaluation of R&D. Research Evaluation, 10 (3), 161–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, M., & Urs, S. R. (2008, October). Network dynamics of scholarship: A social network analysis of digital library community. In Proceedings of the 2nd PhD Workshop on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 101–104). New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Skahill, M. (2003). The role of social support network in college persistence among freshman students. Journal of College Student Retention, 4 (10), 39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Solem, M. N. (2000). Differential adoption of internet-based teaching practices in college geography. Journal of Geography, 99, 219–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J., Healey, K., & Chong, M. (2010). Leading and managing instruction: Formal and informal aspects of the elementary school organization. In A. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory (pp. 129–158). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szulanski, G. (1996). Internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practices within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenkasi, R., & Chesmore, M. (2003). Social networks and planned change: The impact of strong ties on effective change implementation and use. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39 (3), 281–300.
   Google Scholar
• Teranishi, R., & Briscoe, K. (2006). Social capital and the racial stratification of college opportunity. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 21, pp. 591–614). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S. (2000). Ties that bind: A social network approach to understanding student integration and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 71 (5), 591–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, W. (1988). Organizational culture in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 59 (1), 2–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, W. (2006). Trust and the public good. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, W. G., Corwin, Z., & Colyar, J. (2005). Preparing for college: Nine elements of effective outreach. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (2005). Identities, boundaries, and social ties. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Traud, A. L., Kelsic, E. D., Mucha, P. J., & Porter, M. A. (2011). Comparing community structure to characteristics in online collegiate social networks. SIAM Review, 53 (3), 526–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, W. (2002). Social structure of competition within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intra-organizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13 (2), 179–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente, T. (1995). Network models of the diffusion of innovations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, B., & Berkowitz, S. (Eds.). (1988). Social structures: A network approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9 (5).
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002) Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. D. (2003). Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54 (5), 423–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. D. (2001). Diffusion of an innovation: Digital reference service in Carnegie Foundation Master's (Comprehensive) Academic Institution Libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27, 173–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar