Do Performance-Based Funding Policies Affect Underrepresented Student Enrollment?

References

• Aldrich, H. E., & Pfeffer, J. (1976). Environments of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 79–105. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.000455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banta, T. W., Rudolph, L. B., Van Dyke, J., & Fisher, H. S. (1996). Performance funding comes of age in Tennessee. The Journal of Higher Education, 67, 23–45. doi:10.1080/00221546.1996.11780248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron’s Educational Series. (2009). Barron’s profiles of American colleges: Descriptions of the colleges. Hauppauge, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Belasco, A. S., Rosinger, K. O., & Hearn, J. C. (2015). The test-optional movement at America’s selective liberal arts colleges: A boon for equity or something else? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37, 206–223. doi:10.3102/0162373714537350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belasco, A. S., & Trivette, M. J. (2015). Aiming low: Estimating the scope and predictors of postsecondary undermatch. The Journal of Higher Education, 86, 233–263. doi:10.1080/00221546.2015.11777363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 249–275. doi:10.1162/003355304772839588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (2016, September). Postsecondary success advocacy priorities. Retrieved from http://postsecondary.gatesfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/PS-ADV-Priorities-V1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cielinski, A., & Pham, D. (2017). Equity measures in state outcomes-based funding: Incentives for public colleges to support low-income and underprepared students. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Courty, P., Kim, D. H., & Marschke, G. (2011). Curbing cream-skimming: Evidence on enrolment incentives. Labour Economics, 18, 643–655. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2011.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, S., & Krueger, A. B. (2011). Estimating the return to college selectivity over the career using administrative earning data (Industrial Relations Section Working Paper #563). Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Delaney, J. A., & Doyle, W. R. (2011). State spending on higher education: Testing the balance wheel over time. Journal of Education Finance, 36, 343–368.
   Google Scholar
• Deming, D. J., & Figlio, D. (2016). Accountability in US education: Applying lessons from K–12 experience to higher education. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 33–56. doi:10.1257/jep.30.3.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, K. J., Jones, S. M., Lahr, H., Natow, R. S., Pheatt, L., & Reddy, V. (2016). Looking inside the black box of performance funding for higher education: Policy instruments, organizational obstacles, and intended and unintended impacts. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2(1), 147–173. doi:10.1353/rus.2016.0007
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, K. J., & Natow, R. S. (2015). The politics of performance funding for higher education: Origins, discontinuations, and transformations. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, K. J., Natow, R. S., & Vega, B. E. (2012). Popular but unstable: Explaining why state performance funding systems in the United States often do not persist. Teachers College Record, 114(3), 1–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, K. J., & Reddy, V. (2011). The impacts of state performance funding systems of higher education institutions: Research literature review and policy implications (Working Paper No. 37). New York, NY: Community College Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. R. (2012). The politics of public college tuition and state financial aid. The Journal of Higher Education, 83, 617–647. doi:10.1080/00221546.2012.11777260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figlio, D. N., & Stone, J. A. (2001). Can public policy affect private school cream skimming? Journal of Urban Economics, 49, 240–266. doi:10.1006/juec.2000.2189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, S. M., & Shepherd, J. C. (2014). Pricing out the disadvantaged? The effect of tuition deregulation in Texas public four-year institutions. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 655, 99–122. doi:10.1177/0002716214539096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandara, D. (2016). Constructing winners and losers: An analysis of higher education performance funding policy designs in Colorado and Texas ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Gandara, D., Rippner, J. A., & Ness, E. C. (2017). Exploring the ‘how’ in policy diffusion: National intermediary organizations’ roles in facilitating the spread of performance-based funding policies in the states. The Journal of Higher Education, 88, 701–725. doi:10.1080/00221546.2016.1272089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrish, E. (2016). The impact of performance management on performance in public organizations: A meta-analysis. Public Administration Review, 76, 48–66. doi:10.1111/puar.12433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorbunov, A. V. (2013). Performance funding in public higher education: Determinants of policy shifts ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, N. W. (2016). Why performance-based college funding doesn’t work. New York, NY: The Century Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, N. W., Fryar, A. H., & Crespin-Trujillo, V. (2018). Evaluating the impact of performance funding in Ohio and Tennessee. American Educational Research Journal, 55(1), 144–170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, N. W., Tandberg, D. A., & Fryar, A. H. (2015). Evaluating the impacts of ‘new’ performance funding in higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37, 501–519. doi:10.3102/0162373714560224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, N. W., Tandberg, D. A., & Gross, J. P. K. (2014). Performance funding in higher education: Do financial incentives impact college completions? The Journal of Higher Education, 85, 826–857. doi:10.1080/00221546.2014.11777349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, M. (2009). The effect of attending the flagship state university on earnings: A discontinuity-based approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91, 717–724. doi:10.1162/rest.91.4.717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoxby, C. M., & Turner, S. (2013). Expanding college opportunities for high-achieving, low-income students. Stanford, CA: Stanford Institute for Economic Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Indiana Commission for Higher Education. (n.d.). Performance-based funding for public colleges and universities: Frequently asked questions. Retrieved from https://www.in.gov/che/files/Performance_Funding_FAQ_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jaquette, O., Curs, B. R., & Posselt, J. R., (2016). Tuition rich, mission poor: Nonresident enrollment growth and the socioeconomic and racial composition of public research universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(5), 635–673.
   Google Scholar
• Jaquette, O., & Parra, E. E. (2014). Using IPEDS data for panel analyses: Core concepts, data challenges, and empirical applications. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 29), pp. 467–533). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. (2013). Outcomes-based funding: The wave of implementation. Boulder, CO: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, T. (2014). Performance funding at MSIs: Considerations and possible measures for public minority-serving institutions. Atlanta, GA: Southern Education Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kantrowitz, M. (2015). Leaving money on the table. Las Vegas, NV: Edvisors.
   Google Scholar
• Kelchen, R. (2016). An analysis of student fees: The roles of states and institutions. The Review of Higher Education, 39, 597–619. doi:10.1353/rhe.2016.0027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelchen, R. (2018). Higher education accountability. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelchen, R., & Stedrak, L. J. (2016). Does performance-based funding affect colleges’ financial priorities? Journal of Education Finance, 41, 302–321. doi:10.1353/jef.2016.0006
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. M., & Ko, J. (2015). The impacts of state control policies on college tuition increase. Educational Policy, 29, 815–838. doi:10.1177/0895904813518100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klarner, C. (2015). Data sets. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20170814074518/http://klarnerpolitics.com/kp-dataset-page.html
   Google Scholar
• Knott, J. H., & Payne, A. A. (2004). The impact of state governance structures on management and performance of public organizations: A study of higher education institutions. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23, 13–30. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kofoed, M. S. (2017). To apply or not to apply: FAFSA completion and financial aid gaps. Research in Higher Education, 58, 1–39. doi:10.1007/s11162-016-9418-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koshal, R. K., & Koshal, M. (2000). State appropriation and higher education tuition: What is the relationship? Education Economics, 8, 81–89. doi:10.1080/096452900110319
   Google Scholar
• Layzell, D. T. (1999). Linking performance to funding outcomes at the state level for public institutions of higher education: Past, present, and future. Research in Higher Education, 40, 233–246. doi:10.1023/A:1018790815103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, A. Y. (2016). The renaissance of performance funding for higher education: Policy adoption, implementation, and impacts (Doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Li, A. Y. (2017). Covet thy neighbor or ‘reverse policy diffusion’? State adoption of performance funding 2.0. Research in Higher Education, 58, 746–771. doi:10.1007/s11162-016-9444-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, A. Y., & Zumeta, W. (2016). Performance funding on the ground: Campus responses and perspectives in two states. New York, NY: TIAA Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lumina Foundation. (n.d.). Frequently asked questions: Outcomes-based funding. Retrieved from https://www.luminafoundation.org/outcomes-based-funding-faq
   Google Scholar
• Ma, J., Baum, S., Pender, M., & Welch, M. (2016). Trends in college pricing. Washington, DC: The College Board.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, L., & Hagedorn, L. S. (2017). Performance-based funding for community colleges in Texas: Are colleges disadvantaged by serving the most disadvantaged students? The Journal of Higher Education, 88, 159–182. doi:10.1080/00221546.2016.1243948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. N. S., & Morphew, C. C. (2017). Merchants of optimism: Agenda-setting organizations and the framing of performance-based funding for higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 88, 754–784. doi:10.1080/00221546.2017.1313084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, T. (2016). Higher education outcomes-based funding models and academic quality. Indianapolis, IN: Lumina Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Minckler, T. V. (2016). Improving higher education results through performance-based funding: An analysis of initial outcomes and leader perceptions of the 2012 Ohio 100 percent performance-based funding policy (Doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, V. E. (2011). 10 questions state legislators should ask about higher education. Washington, DC: American Legislative Exchange Council.
   Google Scholar
• National Conference of State Legislatures. (2015, July 31). Performance-based funding for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/research/education/performance-funding.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Pope, D. G., & Pope, J. P. (2009). The impact of college sports success on the quantity and quality of student applications. Southern Economic Journal, 75, 750–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabovsky, T. M. (2012). Accountability in higher education: Exploring impacts on state budgets and institutional spending patterns. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 675–700. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo, M., & Ehrenberg, R. G. (2004). Resident and nonresident tuition and enrollment at flagship state universities. In C. M. Hoxby (Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 303–349). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, A., & Rabovsky, T. (2014). Evaluating impacts of performance funding policies on student outcomes in higher education. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 655, 185–208. doi:10.1177/0002716214541048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford, T., & Hunter, J. M. (2011). Impact of performance-funding on retention and graduation rates. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19, 33. doi:10.14507/epaa.v19n33.2011
   Google Scholar
• Shin, J. C. (2010). Impacts of performance-based accountability on institutional performance in the U.S. Higher Education, 60, 47–68. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9285-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulock, N. (2011). Concerns about performance-based funding and ways that states are addressing the concerns. Sacramento: California State University Sacramento Institute for Higher Education Leadership & Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., Pender, M., & Howell, J. (2013). The full extent of student–college academic undermatch. Economics of Education Review, 32, 247–261. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, M. (2016, April 18). Jumping to conclusions. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2016/04/18/essay-challenging-academic-studies-states-performance-funding-formulas
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, M., & Fox, B. (2016). Driving better outcomes: Fiscal year 2016 state status & typology update. Washington, DC: HCM Strategists.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, T. D., De Brey, C., & Dillow, S. A. (2016). Digest of education statistics 2015. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, M., & Zeckhauser, R. (1971). Insurance, information, and individual action. The American Economic Review, 61(2), 380–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State Higher Education Executive Officers. (2017). State higher education finance FY2016. Boulder, CO: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Tandberg, D. A. (2010). Politics, interest groups and state funding of public higher education. Research in Higher Education, 51, 416–450. doi:10.1007/s11162-010-9164-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandberg, D. A., & Hillman, N. W. (2014). State higher education performance funding: Data, outcomes, and policy implications. Journal of Education Finance, 39, 222–243.
   Google Scholar
• Tandberg, D. A., Hillman, N. W., & Barakat, M. (2014). State higher education performance funding for community colleges: Diverse effects and policy implications. Teachers College Record, 116, 12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umbricht, M. R., Fernandez, F., & Ortagus, J. C. (2017). An examination of the (un)intended consequences of performance funding in higher education. Educational Policy, 31, 643–673. doi:10.1177/0895904815614398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerts, D. J., & Ronca, J. M. (2012). Understanding differences in state support for higher education across states, sectors, and institutions: A longitudinal study. The Journal of Higher Education, 83, 155–185. doi:10.1080/00221546.2012.11777238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar