Building Readiness and Intention Towards STEM Fields of Study: Using HSLS:09 and SEM to Examine This Complex Process among High School Students

References

• Afterschool Alliance. (n.d.). Policies impacting afterschool STEM. Retrieved from http://www.afterschoolalliance.org/STEM-policy.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Alliman-Brissett, A. E., Turner, S. L., & Skovholt, T. M. (2004). Parent support and African American adolescents’ career self-efficacy. Professional School Counseling, 124–132.
   Google Scholar
• American Physical Society [APS]. (2015). Fraction of bachelor’s degrees earned by women, by major. Source: IPEDS completion survey. Retrieved from https://www.aps.org
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1994). Self‐efficacy. In R. J. Corsini (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., pp. 368–369). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology, 51(2), 269–290. doi:10.1111/apps.2002.51.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2005). The evolution of social cognitive theory. In K. G. Smith & M. A. Hit (Eds.), Great minds in management (pp. 9–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2006). Adolescent development from an agentic perspective. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 1–43). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self‐efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72(1), 187–206. doi:10.1111/cdev.2001.72.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, W. J. (2002). Goal orientation and ability: Interactive effects on self-efficacy, performance, and knowledge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkner, L., & Chavez, L. (1997). Access to postsecondary education for the 1992 high school graduates. Postsecondary education descriptive analysis reports. Statistical Analysis Report. US Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-29328.
   Google Scholar
• Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1986). Applications of self-efficacy theory to understanding career choice behavior. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 279–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2012). A primer of LISREL: Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera, A. F., & La Nasa, S. M. (Eds.). (2000). Understanding the college‐choice process. New Directions for Institutional Research, 107, 5–22. doi:10.1002/ir.10701
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera, A. F., & La Nasa, S. M. (2001). On the path to college: Three critical tasks facing America’s disadvantaged. Research in Higher Education, 42(2), 119–149. doi:10.1023/A:1026520002362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44(6), 473–490. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpi, A., Ronan, D. M., Falconer, H. M., & Lents, N. H. (2017). Cultivating minority scientists: Undergraduate research increases self‐efficacy and career ambitions for underrepresented students in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 169–194. doi:10.1002/tea.21341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellanos, M. (2018). Examining Latinas’ STEM career decision-making process: A psychosociocultural approach. The Journal of Higher Education, 89(4), 527–552. doi:10.1080/00221546.2018.1435133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X. (2013). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2014-001. National Center for Education Statistics: Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., & Weko, T. (2009). Stats in brief: Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education (NCES 2009-161). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, D., & Espinoza, A. (2008). Examining the academic success of Latino students in science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM) majors. Journal of College Student Development, 49(4), 285–300. doi:10.1353/csd.0.0018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on STEM Education National Science and Technology Council. (2013, May). Federal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: 5-year strategic plan. Executive Office of the President of the United States. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/stem_stratplan_2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Conley, D. T. (2007). Redefining college readiness. Educational policy improvementCenter (NJ1). Prepared for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. EPIC: Eugene, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, G., Nora, A., & Taggart, A. (2009). Student characteristics, pre-college, college, and environmental factors as predictors of majoring in and earning a STEM degree: An analysis of students attending a hispanic serving institution. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 924–942. doi:10.3102/0002831209349460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagle, E. (1989). Socioeconomic status, family structure, and parental involvement: The correlates of achievement. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association in San Francisco on March, 27–31, San Francisco, California.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1990). Changes in academic motivation and self-perception during early adolescence. From Childhood to Adolescence: A Transitional Period, pp. 134–155.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 1–22. doi:10.1023/A:1009048817385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, X., Miller, B. C., Park, K. E., Winward, B. W., Christensen, M., Grotevant, H. D., & Tai, R. H. (2006). An exploratory study about inaccuracy and invalidity in adolescent self-report surveys. Field Methods, 18(3), 223–244. doi:10.1177/152822X06289161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferry, T. R., Fouad, N. A., & Smith, P. L. (2000). The role of family context in a social cognitive model for career-related choice behavior: A math and science perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57(3), 348–364. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1999.1743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 269–314). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• George Mwangi, C. A. (2015). (Re)Examining the role of family and community in college access and choice: A metasynthesis. The Review of Higher Education, 39(1), 123–151. doi:10.1353/rhe.2015.0046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginzberg, E. (1972). Toward a theory of occupational choice: A restatement. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 20(3), 2–9. doi:10.1002/cdq.1972.20.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Graham, M. J., Frederick, J., Byars-Winston, A., Hunter, A. B., & Handelsman, J. (2013). Increasing persistence of college students in STEM. Science, 341(6153), 1455–1456. doi:10.1126/science.1240487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, B. A., Miller, R. B., Crowson, H. M., Duke, B. L., & Akey, K. L. (2004). Predicting high school students’ cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(4), 462–482. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackett, G. (1985). Role of mathematics self-efficacy in the choice of math-related majors of college women and men: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32(1), 47. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.32.1.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1995). Self-efficacy and career choice and development. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment (pp. 249–280). Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (Second ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C., Dickerson, J., Batts, D., Kauffmann, P., & Bosse, M. (2011). Are we missing opportunities to encourage interest in STEM fields? Journal of Technology Education, 23(1), 32–46. doi:10.21061/jte.v23i1.a.4
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In R. Cudeck, S. Du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future (pp. 195–216). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Haskell, N. (2016, July 28). Classroom strategies to improve student self-efficacy and learning outcomes. Retrieved from http://www.pearsoned.com/education-blog/improve-self-efficacy-learning-outcomes/
   Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H., & Thomas, S. L. (2015). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques: MLM and SEM approaches using Mplus. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, N. E., & Tyson, D. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 740. doi:10.1037/a0015362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingels, S. J., Pratt, D. J., Herget, D., Bryan, M., Fritch, L. B., Ottem, R., … Wilson, D. (2015). High school longitudinal study of 2009 (HSLS:09) 2013 update and high school transcript data file documentation (NCES 2015-036). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch
   Google Scholar
• Ireh, M. (1999). Career development theories and their implications for high school career guidance and counseling. The High School Journal, 83(2), 28–40.
   Google Scholar
• Jeynes, W. H. (2007). The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement a meta-analysis. Urban Education, 42(1), 82–110. doi:10.1177/0042085906293818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanny, M. A., Sax, L. J., & Riggers-Piehl, T. A. (2014). Investigating forty years of STEM research: How explanations for the gender gap have evolved over time. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 20(2), 127–148. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v20.i2
   Google Scholar
• Keller, B. K., & Whiston, S. C. (2008). The role of parental influences on young adolescents’ career development. Journal of Career Assessment, 16(2), 198–217. doi:10.1177/1069072707313206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdés, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to next generation science standards and with implications for common core state standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223–233. doi:10.3102/0013189X13480524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, V. E., & Burkam, D. T. (2002). Inequality at the starting gate: Social background differences in achievement as children begin school. 1660 L Street, NW, Suite 1200, Washington, DC 20036: Economic Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lenox, R. A., & Subich, L. M. (1994). The relationship between self‐efficacy beliefs and inventoried vocational interests. The Career Development Quarterly, 42(4), 302–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Brenner, B., Chopra, S. B., Davis, T., Talleyrand, R., & Suthakaran, V. (2001). The role of contextual supports and barriers in the choice of math/science educational options: A test of social cognitive hypotheses. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(4), 474. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.48.4.474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 36. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. D. Brown (ed.) (2002). Social cognitive career theory. In D. Brown (ed (ed), Career choice and development. 4th ed. (pp. 255–311). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Schmidt, J., Brenner, B., Lyons, H., & Treistman, D. (2003). Relation of contextual supports and barriers to choice behavior in engineering majors: Test of alternative social cognitive models. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(4), 458. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.50.4.458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lent, R. W., Lopez, A. M., Lopez, F. G., & Sheu, H. B. (2008). Social cognitive career theory and the prediction of interests and choice goals in the computing disciplines. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(1), 52–62. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lent, R. W., Lopez, F. G., & Bieschke, K. J. (1991). Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(4), 424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luzzo, D. A., Hasper, P., Albert, K. A., Bibby, M. A., & Martinelli, E. A., Jr. (1999). Effects of self-efficacy-enhancing interventions on the math/science self-efficacy and career interests, goals, and actions of career undecided college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46(2), 233–243. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.46.2.233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Y. (2009). Family socioeconomic status, parental involvement, and college major choices—Gender, race/ ethnic,and nativity patterns. Sociological Perspectives, 52(2), 211–234. doi:10.1525/sop.2009.52.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattern, K., Radunzel, J., & Westrick, P. (2015). Development of STEM readiness benchmarks to assist educational and career decision making. ACT Research Report Series ACT, Inc. Retrieved from https://www.act.org/content/dam/act/unsecured/documents/ACT_RR2015-3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moakler, M. W., & Kim, M. M. (2014). College major choice in STEM: Revisiting confidence and demographic factors. The Career Development Quarterly, 62(2), 128–142. doi:10.1002/cdq.2014.62.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, R. O., & Hancock, G. R. (2008). Best practices in structural equation modeling. In J. Osborne (Ed.), Best practices in quantitative methods (pp. 488–508). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus User’s guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board. 2015. Revisiting the STEM workforce: A companion to science and engineering indicators 2014. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, NSB-2015-10. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2015/nsb201510.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board. 2016. Science and engineering indicators 2016. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, NSB-2016-1. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2016/nsb20161/#/
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation [NSF]. (2014 February). Science and engineering indicators 2014. Arlington, VA, NSB-14-01: National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation [NSF]. (2015). Science and engineering degrees, by race/ethnicity of recipients: 2002–12. Detailed Statistical Tables NSF 15-321. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. Arlington, VA. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2015/nsf15321/
   Google Scholar
• Nauta, M. M., & Epperson, D. L. (2003). A longitudinal examination of the social-cognitive model applied to high school girls' choices of nontraditional college majors and aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(4), 448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paa, H. K., & McWhirter, E. H. (2000). Perceived influences on high school students’ current career expectations. The Career Development Quarterly, 49(1), 29–44. doi:10.1002/cdq.2000.49.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (2005). Self-efficacy during childhood and adolescence. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 339–367). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F, & Kranzler, J. (1995). Self-efficacy beliefs and general mental ability in mathematical problem-solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(4), 426-443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Urdan, T. C. (2006). Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, R. T., Maramba, D. C., & Dancy, T. E. (2011). A qualitative investigation of factors promoting the retention and persistence of students of color in STEM. The Journal of Negro Education, 80(4), 491–504.
   Google Scholar
• Perna, L. W. (2005). The key to college access: Rigorous academic preparation. In W. G. Tierney, Z. B. Corwin, & J. Colyar (Eds.), Preparing for college: Nine elements of effective outreach (pp. 113–134). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perna, L. W. (2006). Studying college access and choice: A proposed conceptual model. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education handbook of theory and research (Vol. 21, pp. 99–157).  Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology [PCAST]. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Executive Report from the Executive Office of the President of the United States. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel-final_2-25-12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Raykov, T. (2009). Evaluation of scale reliability for unidimensional measures using latent variable modeling. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 42(3), 223–232. doi:10.1177/0748175609344096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittmayer, A. D., & Beier, M. E. (2008). Self-efficacy in STEM. In B. Bogue & E. Cady (Eds.), Applying Research to Practice (ARP) resources. Retrieved from http://www.engr.psu.edu/AWE/ARPresources.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Rohde, T. E., & Thompson, L. A. (2007). Predicting academic achievement with cognitive ability. Intelligence, 35(1), 83–92. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2006.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rottinghaus, P. J., Larson, L. M., & Borgen, F. H. (2003). The relation of self-efficacy and interests: A meta-analysis of 60 samples. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62(2), 221–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education, 96(3), 411–427. doi:10.1002/sce.21007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savitz-Romer, M., & Bouffard, S. M. (2012). Ready, willing, and able: A developmental approach to college access and success. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J., Kanny, M., Riggers-Piehl, T. A., Whang, H., & Paulson, L. N. (2015). “But I’m not good at math”: The changing salience of mathematical self-concept in shaping women’s and men’s STEM aspirations. Research in Higher Education, 56(8), 813–842. doi:10.1007/s11162-015-9375-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J., Kanny, M. A., Jacobs, J. A., Whang, H., Weintraub, D. S., & Hroch, A. (2016). Understanding the changing dynamics of the gender gap in undergraduate engineering majors: 1971–2011. Research in Higher Education, 57(5), 570–600. doi:10.1007/s11162-015-9396-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J., Lehman, K. J., Jacobs, J. A., Kanny, M. A., Lim, G., Monje-Paulson, L., & Zimmerman, H. B. (2017). Anatomy of an enduring gender gap: The evolution of women’s participation in computer science. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(2), 258–293. doi:10.1080/00221546.2016.1257306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 70. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2010). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation. Interest, and Academic Engagement, (June 2012), 3741.
   Google Scholar
• Spinath, B., Spinath, F. M., Harlaar, N., & Plomin, R. (2006). Predicting school achievement from general cognitive ability, self-perceived ability, and intrinsic value. Intelligence, 34(4), 363–374. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2005.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton, L. M. (2013). Incorporating sampling weights into single-and multilevel analyses. In L. Rutowski, M. von Davier, & D. Rutowski (Eds.), A handbook of international large-scale assessment (pp. 363–387). London, UK: Chapman Hill/CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stapleton, L. M., Yang, J. S., & Hancock, G. R. (2016). Construct meaning in multilevel settings. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 41(5), 481–520. doi:10.3102/1076998616646200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, S., & Lapan, R. T. (2002). Career self‐efficacy and perceptions of parent support in adolescent career development. The Career Development Quarterly, 51(1), 44–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.). Every student succeeds act (ESSA). Retrieved from https://www.ed.gov/esea
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. (2013a). Modeling entrance into STEM fields of study among students beginning at community colleges and four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 54(6), 664–692. doi:10.1007/s11162-013-9291-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. (2013b). Why students choose STEM majors motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1081–1121. doi:10.3102/0002831213488622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, J., & Mazur, E. (2013). Retaining students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 36–41.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. R. (2005). Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing (statistical modeling and decision science) (Vol. 2). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. L., Adamuti-Trache, M., & Connolly, J. (2019). From community college attendants to baccalaureate recipients: A planned behavior model of transfer students in STEM fields of study. The Journal of Higher Education, 90(3), 373–401. doi:10.1080/00221546.2018.1536935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663–676.
   Google Scholar