Faculty Hiring: Exercising Professional Jurisdiction Over Epistemic Matters

References

• Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, K., & Cidro, J. (2019). Decades of doing: Indigenous women academics reflect on the practices of community-based health research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(3), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619835707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories. McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bernal, D. D., & Villalpando, O. (2002). An apartheid of knowledge in academia: The struggle over the “legitimate” knowledge of faculty of color. Equity & Excellence in Education, 35(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/713845282
   Google Scholar
• BlackDeer, A. A. (2023). Unsettling feminism in social work: Toward an indigenous decolonial feminism. Affilia, 38(4), 615–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/08861099231193617
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, A. (1994). The massacre of the dreamers. University of New Mexico Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, A. F. (1976). What is the thing called science? Hackett Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Chemerinsky, E., & Gillman, H. (2017). Free speech on campus. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, G., McClure, K. R., & Orphan, C. M. (2022). Introduction: Broadly accessible colleges and universities. In G. Crisp, K. R. McClure, & C. M. Orphan (Eds.), Unlocking opportunity through broadly accessible institutions (pp. 3–17). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Culpepper, D. (2022). They were surprised: Professional legitimacy, social bias, and dual-career academic couples. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotson, K. (2011). Concrete flowers: Contemplating the profession of philosophy. Hypatia, 26(2), 403–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01176.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. K. (2008). “What’s too much and what’s too little?”: The process of becoming an independent researcher in doctoral education. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 326–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2008.11772101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. (1998). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Go, J. (2020). Race, empire, and epistemic exclusion: Or the structures of sociological thought. Sociological Theory, 38(2), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275120926213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales, L. D., Gong, R. H., Miao, S. & Surla, K.(2023). Women academics, identity capitalism, and the imperative of transformation. In Research handbook on the transformation of higher education (pp. 255–267).
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, K. A. (2019). Institutional barriers, strategies, and benefits to increasing the representation of women and men of color in the professoriate: Looking beyond the pipeline. In L. W. Perna (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 35, pp. 1–73). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31365-4_4
   Google Scholar
• Haack, S. (2012). Six signs of scientism. Logos & Episteme, 3(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.5840/logos-episteme20123151
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, J. (2022). Fresh banana leaves: Healing indigenous landscapes through indigenous science. North Atlantic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, J. (2022). Fresh banana leaves: Healing landscapes through indigenous science. North Atlantic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kahlke, R. M. (2014). Generic qualitative approaches: Pitfalls and benefits of methodological mixology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691401300119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 167–195. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, E. J. (2021). Allies and rivals: German-American exchange and the rise of the modern research university. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liera, R., & Hernández, T. E. (2021). Color-evasive racism in the final stage of faculty searches: Examining search committee hiring practices that jeopardize racial equity policy. The Review of Higher Education, 45(2), 181–209. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2021.0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loss, C. P. (2005). Bureaucratic tyranny: “The price of structure” in the American university. History of Education Quarterly, 45(3), 446–453.
   Google Scholar
• Masta, S. (2021). Classroom counterspaces: Centering brown and black students in doctoral education. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(3), 354–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1894119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, A. (2009). Professing to learn: Creating tenured lives and careers in the American research university. Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Meara, K., Culpepper, D., & Templeton, L. L. (2020). Nudging toward diversity: Applying behavioral design to faculty hiring. Review of Educational Research, 90(3), 311–348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320914742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Meara, K., Templeton, L. L., White-Lewis, D. K., Culpepper, D., & Anderson, J. (2023). The safest bet: Identifying and assessing risk in faculty selection. American Educational Research Journal, 60(2), 330–366. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312221150438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega, M. (2016). In-between: Latina feminist phenomenology, multiplicity, and the self. SUNY press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, P. (2018). The art of gathering: How we meet and why it matters. Riverhead Books.
   Google Scholar
• Posselt, J. R. (2015). Disciplinary logics in doctoral admissions: Understanding patterns of faculty evaluation. The Journal of Higher Education, 86(6), 807–833. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2015.0030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, K. A. (2020). Reimagining the study of higher education: Generous thinking, chaos, and order in a low consensus field. The Review of Higher Education, 43(4), 917–934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settles, I. H., Jones, M. K., Buchanan, N. T., & Brassel, S. T. (2022). Epistemic exclusion of women faculty and faculty of color: Understanding scholar(ly) devaluation as a predictor of turnover intentions. The Journal of Higher Education, 93(1), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2021.1914494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settles, I. H., Jones, M. K., Buchanan, N. T., & Dotson, K. (2021). Epistemic exclusion: Scholar(ly) devaluation that marginalizes faculty of color. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14(4), 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, T. (1918/2015). The higher learning in America: A memorandum on the conduct of universities by businessmen. Cosimo Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Veysey, L. R. (1965). The emergence of the American university. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Villarreal, C. D. (2022). Servingness in the borderlands: A study of faculty hiring at a Hispanic-serving institution on the border. AERA Open, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584221099597
   Google Scholar
• White-Lewis, D. K. (2021). Before the ad: How departments generate hiring priorities that support or avert faculty diversity. Teachers College Record, 123(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812112300109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar