Statistical quality control of streamflow measurements with moving-boat acoustic Doppler current profilers

References

• Airy, G.B. (1861). On the algebraical and numerical theory of error of observations and the combination of observations, Cambridge: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Czuba, J. A., & Oberg, K. A. (2008). Validation of exposure time for discharge measurements made with two bottom-tracking acoustic Doppler current profilers. Proceedings of the IEEE/OES/CMTC Ninth Working Conference on Current Measurement Technology, Charleston, SC, 2008, pp. 245–249. http://hydroacoustics.usgs.gov/publications/CMTC08-finalpaper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Environment Canada (2004). Procedures for the review and approval of ADCP discharge measurements (first edition), Ottawa, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• García, C., Tarrab, L., Oberg, K. A., Szupiany, R., & Cantero, M. (2012). Variance of discharge estimates sampled using acoustic Doppler current profilers from moving platforms. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 138, 684–694. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Castro, J. A., & Muste, M. (2007). Framework for estimating uncertainty of ADCP measurements from a moving boat by standardized uncertainty analysis. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 133, 1390–1410. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:12(1390)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H. (2006). Analysis of random error in ADCP discharge measurement, Part I: A model for predicting random uncertainty. China Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 37, 619–624 [in Chinese].
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H. (2008). Estimating precision of moving boat ADCP discharge measurement. Proceedings (DVD) of 14th Australian Hydrographers Association Conference: Water Initiatives 2008 and Beyond. Australia Hydrographers Association, Northcote.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H. (2012). Uncertainty model for in situ quality control of stationary ADCP open channel discharge measurement. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 138(1), 4–12. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H. (2014). Uncertainty-based measurement quality control. Accreditation and Quality Assurance (ACQUAL), 19(2), 65–73. doi:10.1007/s00769-013-1032-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, J. P., & Duan, Y. Y. (2008). A solution to moving bed condition in ADCP streamflow measurements. Yangtze River Downstream Hydrology and Water Resources Survey Bureau, Yangtze River Conservation Commissions, Nanjing, China [in Chinese].
   Google Scholar
• Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM) (2008). Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM 1995 with minor corrections). Geneva, Switzerland (http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM) (2012). Evaluation of measurement data – The role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment. Geneva, Switzerland (http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_106_2012_E.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Lipscomb, S.W. (1995). Quality assurance plan for discharge measurements using broadband acoustic Doppler current profilers. Open-File Report, 95-701, US Geological Survey (USGS), Reston, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z. (1979). Maximum residual method for precision evaluation, Science China, (4), 337–344 (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Michel, L. (2011). Ekoton, Turkey visit report. Teledyne RD Instruments Europe, La Gaude, France.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Water Resources (MWR), People's Republic of China (2006). Guidance for streamflow measurements using acoustic Doppler current profiler. SL337-2006. Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, D. S. (2012). Review and rating of moving-boat ADCP Q measurements. US Geological Survey, Office of Surface Water HydroAcoustic webinar, (http://hydroacoustics.usgs.gov/training/webinars/Review_and_Rating_of_Moving-Boat_ADCP_Measurements.mp4).
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, D. S., Wagner, C. R. (2007). Correcting acoustic Doppler current profiler discharge measurements biased by sediment transport. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 133, 1329–1336. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:12(1329)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, D. S., & Wagner, C. R. (2009). Measuring discharge with acoustic Doppler current profilers from a moving boat. US Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 3–A22, 72 p. (http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/3a22/pdf/tm3a22_lowres.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Oberg, K. A., Morlock, S. E., & Caldwell, W. S. (2005). Quality-assurance plan for discharge measurements using acoustic Doppler current profilers. Scientific Investigations Rep. 2005-5183, US Geological Survey (USGS), Reston, VA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Oberg, K. A., & Mueller, D. S. (2007). Validation of streamflow measurements made with acoustic Doppler current profilers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 133, 1421–1432. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:12(1421)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie, C. D., & Rainville, F. (2006). Case study of precision of GPS differential correction strategies: Influence on aDcp velocity and discharge estimates. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 132, 225–234. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2006)132:3(225)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, M. R. (2001). Discharge measurements using a broad-band acoustic Doppler current profiler. Open-File Rep. 01-1, US Geological Survey (USGS), Reston, VA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrab, L., García, C. M., Cantero, M. I., & Oberg, K. (2012). Role of turbulence fluctuations on uncertainties of acoustic Doppler current profiler discharge measurements. Water Resources Research, 48, W06507, doi:10.1029/2011WR011185.
   Google Scholar
• US Geological Survey (2002). Policy and technical guidance on discharge measurements using acoustic Doppler current profilers. US Geological Survey, Office of Surface Water Technical Memorandum 2002.02, accessed August 13, 2008 (http://hydroacoustics.usgs.gov/memos/OSW2002-02.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• US Geological Survey (USGS) (2011). Exposure time for ADCP moving-boat discharge measurements made during steady flow conditions. Office of Surface Water Technical Memorandum, 11 September 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Wadsworth, H. M., Jr. (1989). Summarization and interpretation of data. In M. Harrison & H. M. Wadsworth Jr., Handbook of statistical methods for engineers and scientists. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, C. R., & Mueller, D. S. (2011). Comparison of bottom-track to global positioning system referenced discharges measured using an acoustic Doppler current profiler. Journal of Hydrology, 401, 250–258. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.02.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Water Information Standards Business Forum (WISBF) (2013). National industry guidelines for hydrometric monitoring Part 8: Application of acoustic Doppler current profilers to measure discharge in open channels. WISBF GL 100.08–2013, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Wang, Z., & Liu, Z. (2005). On the maximum residual by Monte Carlo simulation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 13 300–303 (http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/13/1/070).
   Google Scholar