https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7781-3526
References
- Bozhinova, S., Kisliakov, D., Müller, G., Hecht, V., & Schneider, S. (2013). Hydropower converters with head differences below 2.5 m. Proceedings of the ICE-Energy, 166(3), 107–119.
- European Small Hydropower Association (ESHA). (2014). Small and micro hydropower restoration handbook. Athens: National Technical University of Athens.
- v. Harten, M., Paudel, S., & Saenger, N. (2013). Nutzung kleiner Fallhöhen: aus Forschung und Entwicklung [Utilisation of small head differences: Research and development]. Proc. Tagung Kleinwasserkraft, Technical University of Stuttgart (in German).
- Kougias, I., Aggidis, G., Avellan, F., Deniz, S., Lundin, U., Moro, A., … Theodossiou, N. (2019). Analysis of emerging technologies in the hydropower sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 113, 109257. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109257
- Lubitz, D., Lyons, M., & Simmons, S. (2014). Performance model of Archimedes screw hydro turbines with variable fill level. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 140, 04014050. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000922
- Müller, W. (1899). Eisernen Wasserrader. Leipzig: Veit & Comp. (in German).
- Müller, G., & Kauppert, K. (2004). Performance characteristics of water wheels. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 42, 451–460. doi: 10.1080/00221686.2004.9641215
- Müller, G., & Wolter, C. (2004). The breastshot waterwheel: Design and model tests. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Engineering Sustainability, 157(4), 203–211. doi: 10.1680/ensu.2004.157.4.203
- Nuernbergk, D., & Rorres, C. (2013). Analytical model for water inflow of an Archimedes screw used in hydropower generation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 139(2), 213–220. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000661
- Quaranta, E., & Müller, G. (2018). Sagebien and Zuppinger water wheels for very low head hydropower applications. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 56(4), 526–536. doi: 10.1080/00221686.2017.1397556
- Quaranta, E., & Revelli, R. (2016). Optimization of breastshot water wheels performance using different inflow configurations. Renewable Energy, 97, 243–251. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.05.078
- Quaranta, E., & Revelli, R. (2017). CFD simulations to optimize the blade design of water wheels. Drinking water Engineering and Science, 10, 27–32. doi: 10.5194/dwes-10-27-2017
- Quaranta, E., & Revelli, R. (2018). Gravity water wheels as a micro hydropower energy source: A review based on historic data, design methods, efficiencies and modern optimizations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 97, 414–427. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.033
- Sagebien, M. (1866). La Roue Hydraulique Sagebien. Expériences sur la roue hydraulique Sagebien, précédées d'un Exposé du principe de ce nouveau moteur à aubes immergentes et à niveau maintenu dans les aubes. Paris: Ed. : Eugène Lacroix. (in French).
- Tresca, M. (1870). Roue de l’établissement hydraulique de Trilbardou, par M. Sagebien. Bulletin de la Société d’encouragement à l’industrie nationale, Avril 1870, tome XVII, 193–205.