Recreation Participation and the Validity of Photo-based Preference Judgments

References

• Abelson, R. P. (1983). Whatever became of consistency theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronson, E. (1984). The social animal (4th ed.). New York: Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Boster, R. S., & Daniel, T. C. (1972). Measuring public responses to vegetative management. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Arizona Watershed Symposium (pp. 38–43). Phoenix, AZ: Arizona Water Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Brookshire, D. S., Randall, A., & Stoll, J. R. (1980). Valuing increments and decrements in natural resource service flows. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62, 478–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. C., & Daniel, T. C. (1984). Modeling forest scenic beauty: Concepts and application to ponderosa pine. (USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-256). Fort Collins, CO: Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. C., & Daniel, T. C. (1986). Predicting scenic beauty of timber stands. Forest Science, 32, 471–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhyoff, G. J., & Leuschner, W. A. (1978). Estimating psychological disutility from damaged forest stands. Forest Science, 24, 424–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhyoff, G. J., Wellman, J. D., & Daniel, T. C. (1982). Predicting scenic quality for mountain pine beetle and western spruce budworm damaged forest vistas. Forest Science, 28, 827–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, N. A. (1987). Critical factors and their threshold for camper satisfaction at two campgrounds. Journal of Leisure Research, 19, 159–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, T. C., & Boster, R. S. (1976). Measuring landscape esthetics: The scenic beauty method. (USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-167). Fort Collins, CO: Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, T. C., Brown, T. C., King, D. A., Richards, M. T., & Stewart, W. P. (in press). Perceived scenic beauty and contingent valuation of forest campgrounds. Forest Science.
   Google Scholar
• Daubert, J. T., & Young, R. A. (1981). Recreational demands for maintaining instream flows: A contingent valuation approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63, 667–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorfman, P. W. (1979). Measurement and meaning of recreation satisfaction: A case study in camping. Environment and Behavior, 11, 483–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebel, R. L. (1951). Estimation of the reliability ratings. Psychometrika, 16, 407–424.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. H., & Hudman, L. E. (1978). Assessment of the environmental impact of high voltage power transmission lines. Journal of Environmental Management, 6, 153–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellomaki, S., & Savolainen, R. (1984). The scenic value of the forest landscape as assessed in the field and the laboratory. Landscape Planning, 11, 97–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lime, D. W. (1971). Factors influencing campground use in the Superior National Forest of Minnesota. (USDA Forest Service Research Paper NC-60). St. Paul, MN: North Central Forest Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, G. L., & Newmann, E. S. (1969). Modeling and predicting human response to the visual recreation environment. Journal of Leisure Resource, 1, 219–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall, A., Ives, B., & Eastman, C. (1974). Bidding games for valuation of aesthetic environmental improvements. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1, 132–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, R. D., d'Arge, R. C., & Brookshire, D. S. (1980). An experiment on the economic value of visibility. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 7, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, H. W. (1984). Environmental perception rating scales: A case for simple methods of analysis. Environment and Behavior, 16, 573–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, H. W., & Daniel, T. C. (1981). Progress in predicting the perceived scenic beauty of forest landscapes. Forest Science, 21, 71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Shafer, E. L., Jr., & Richards, T. A. (1974). A comparison of viewer reactions to outdoor scenes and photographs of those scenes. (USDA Forest Service Research Paper NE-302). Upper Darby, PA: Northeastern Forest Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar
• Shafer, E. L., Jr., Hamilton, J. F., Jr., & Schmidt, E. A. (1969). Natural landscape preferences: A predictive model. Journal of Leisure Research, 1, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelby, B., & Harris, R. (1985). Comparing methods for determining visitor evaluations of ecological impacts: Site visits, photographs, and written descriptions. Journal of Leisure Research, 17, 57–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuttleworth, S. (1980). The use of photographs as an environmental presentation medium in landscape studies. Journal of Environmental Management, 11, 61–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, T. R., Middleton, P., Downton, M., & Ely, D. (1984). Judgments of photographs vs. field observations in studies of perception and judgment of the visual environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4, 283–302.
   Google Scholar
• Torgerson, W. S. (1958). Theory and methods of scaling, 460 p. New York: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman &: J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (Vol. 6, pp. 85–125). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlwill, J. F., & Harris, G. (1980). Response to congruity or contrast for man-made features in natural-recreation settings. Leisure Sciences, 3, 349–365.
   Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (1981). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zube, E. H., Pitt, D. G., & Anderson, T. W. (1975). Perception and prediction of scenic resource values of the northeast. In E. H. Zube, R. O. Brush, & J. G. Fabos (Eds.), Landscape, assessment: Values, preceptions, and resources (pp. 151–167). Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson, & Ross.
   Google Scholar