Economic Valuation of Deer Hunting on Louisiana Public Land: A Travel Cost Analysis

References

• Becker, G. (1965). A theory of allocation of time. Economic Journal, 75, 493–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, R., & Heberlein, T. (1979). Measuring values of extramarket goods: are indirect measures biased? American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 61, 926–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, W., & Nawas, F. (1973). Impact of aggregation on the estimation of outdoor recreation demand functions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 55, 246–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, W., Sorhus, C., Chou-yang, B., & Richards, J. (1983). Using individual observations to estimate recreation demand functions: caution. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 65, 154–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, O., & Brewer, D. (1971). Estimation of net social benefits from outdoor recreation. Econometrica. 39, 813–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caulkins, P., Bishop, R., & Bouwes, Sr., N. (1986). The travel cost model for lake recreation: a comparison of two methods for incorporating site quality and substitution effects. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 68, 291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesario, F. (1976). Value of time in recreational studies. Land Economics. 52, 32–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesario, F., & Knetsch, J. (1970). The time bias in recreation benefit estimates. Water Resource Research. 6, 700–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, C., Fisher, A., & Smith, V. (1975). An econometric evaluation of a generalized consumer surplus measure: the mineral king controversy. Econometrica. 44, 1259–76.
   Google Scholar
• Collings, J. (1974). The valuation of leisure travel time. Regional Urban Economics. 4, 65–7.
   Google Scholar
• Commons, M. (1973). A note on the use of clawson method for the evaluation of recreation benefits. Regional Studies. 7, 401–06.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, D., & Nelson L. (1986). Net economic value of deer hunting in Idaho. USDA Forest Service, Rockey Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Resources Bulletin RM-13. Fort Collins, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Farber, S. (1988). The value of coastal wetlands for recreation: an application of travel cost and contingent valuation methodologies. Journal of Environmental Management. 26, 299–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotvedt, J., & Luzar, E. (1989). The economic value of white-tailed deer hunting on the Sherburne Wildlife Management Area and the Atchafalaya National Wildlife Refuge. Louisana Agricultural Experiment Station Research Bulletin No. 820, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R., Bowes, K., & Wilman, E. (1981). A methodology for estimating the consequences of forest management on recreation benefits. Multiple Use Forestry Project, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. (1983). Measuring the cost of time in recreation: comment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 65, 169–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kealy, M., & Bishop, R. (1986). Theoretical and empirical specifications issues in travel cost demand studies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 68, 660–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knetsch, J. (1983). Outdoor recreation demands and benefits. Land Economics. 39, 387–96.
   Google Scholar
• Knetsch, J., & Cesario, F. (1976). Some problems in estimating the demand for outdoor recreation: comment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 11, 596–7.
   Google Scholar
• Knetsch, J., Brown, R., & Hansen, W. (1976). Estimating expected use and value of recreation sites. In C. Gearing, W. Swert, and T. Var, eds. Planning for Tourism Development, (pp. 4671). New York, New York: Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Loomis, J., Donnelly, D., Sorg, C., & Oldenburg, L. (1985). The net economic value of hunting unique species in Idaho: bighorn sheep, mountain goat, moose and antelope. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Service Resource Bulletin RM-10. Fort Collins, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, K., & Strand, I. (1981). Measuring the cost of time in recreation demand analysis: an application to sport fishing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 63, 153–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, K., & Strand, I. (1983). Measuring the cost of time in recreation demand analysis: a reply. Agricultural Journal of Economics. 65, 172–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, L, Bowes, M., & Dwyer, J. (1978). Reflecting travel time in travel-cost-based estimates of recreation use and value. Forestry Research Report No. 78–12 Agricultural Experimentation Station. University of Illinois, Champaign, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, D., Donnelley, D., Schiffhauer, M., & Brink, G. (1986). User's guide to RMTCM: software for travel cost analysis. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station General Technical Report RM-132. Boulder, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, V., Desvousges, W., & McGivney, M. (1983). The opportunity cost of travel time in recreation demand models. Land Economics. 59, 259–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, V. & Kopp, R. (1980). The spatial limits of the travel cost demand model. Land Economics, 63, 64–72.
   Google Scholar
• Sorg, C., & Nelson, L. (1986). Net economic value of elk hunting in Idaho. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Resource Bulletin RM- 12. Fort Collins, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Strong, E. (1983). A note on the functional form of travel cost models with unequal populations. Land Economics 59, 342–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, F. (1983). Measuring the cost of time in recreation demand analysis: comment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 65, 167–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilman, E. (1980). The value of time in recreation benefit studies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 7, 272–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar