A Boating Choice Model for the Valuation of Lake Access

References

• Becker, Gary S. (1974). A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy 82, 1063–1093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M. & Lerman, S. R. (1985). Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bockstael, N. E., Hanemann, W. M., & Kling, C. L. (1987). Estimating the value of water quality improvements in a recreation demand framework. Water Resources Research 23 (5), 951–960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bockstael, N. E., K. E. McConnell, & Strand, I. E. (1991). Recreation. In J. B. Braden & C. D. Kolstad (Eds.), Measuring the demand for environmental quality. B. V. North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bockstael, N. E., K. E. McConnell, & Strand, I. E. (1989). A random utility model for sportfishing: Some preliminary results for Florida. Marine Resource Economics 6, 245–260.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. N. & Downing, K. B. (1985). Why here and not there: The conditional nature of recreation choice. In G. H. Stankey & S. F. McCool (Eds.), Proceedings—Symposium on Recreation Choice Behavior (Gen. Tech. Report INT-184, pp. 31–37). Inter-mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT: Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. J., Adamowicz, W. L., & Tomasi T. (1990). The travel cost model of recreation demand: Theoretical and empirical issues. Journal of Leisure Sciences 12, 119–147.
   Google Scholar
• Graefe, A. R., Vaske, J. J., Moore, R. L., & Lenz, G. E. (1988). A boating capacity evaluation of Raystown Lake. Report, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H. (1990). LIMDEP [Computer software]. New York: Econometrics Software, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kaoru, Y. (1991). Valuing marine recreation by the nested random utility model: Functional structure, party composition and heterogeneity. Marine Policy Center, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, K. E., & Strand I. (1981). Measuring the cost of time in recreation demand analysis: An application to sportfishing. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 63, 153–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (1981). Econometric models of probabilistic choice. In C. Manski & D. McFadden (Eds.) Structural analysis of discrete data, 198–272. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morey, E. R., Shaw, W. D., & Rowe, R. D. (1991). A discrete-choice model of recreational participation, site choice, and activity valuation when complete trip data are not available. Journal of Environ. Econ. and Management 20, 181–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, G. L., Stynes, D. J., Rosenthal D. H., & Dwyer, J. F. (1985). Substitution in recreation choice behavior. In G. H. Stankey & S. F. McCool (Eds.), Proceedings—Symposium on Recreation Choice Behavior (Gen. Tech. Report INT-184, pp. 31–37). Inter-mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT: Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, V. K. (1989). Taking stock of progress with travel cost recreation demand methods: Theory and implementation. Marine Resource Economics 6, 279–310.
   Google Scholar
• Stankey, G. H. & McCool, S. F. (Eds.), Proceedings—Symposium on Recreation Choice Behavior (Gen. Tech. Report INT-184). Inter-mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT: Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Stynes, D. J. & Peterson, G. L. (1984). A review of logit models with implication for modeling recreation choices. Journal of Leisure Research 16 (4), 295–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D. R. (1985). A developmental model of recreation choice behavior. In G. H. Stankey & S. F. McCool (Eds.), Proceedings—Symposium on Recreation Choice Behavior (Gen. Tech. Report INT-184, pp. 31–37). Inter-mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT: Forest Service.
   Google Scholar